No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder.

Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with impaired decision making, yet few studies have adopted paradigms from behavioral economics to decompose which, if any, aspects of decision making may be impacted. This may be particularly relevant for decision-making processes relevant to known difficulties w...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Zachary Anderson, Kim Fairley, Cynthia M Villanueva, R McKell Carter, June Gruber
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/8670ef6da509467fa374330f69db514b
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:8670ef6da509467fa374330f69db514b
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:8670ef6da509467fa374330f69db514b2021-12-02T20:07:43ZNo group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0258360https://doaj.org/article/8670ef6da509467fa374330f69db514b2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258360https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with impaired decision making, yet few studies have adopted paradigms from behavioral economics to decompose which, if any, aspects of decision making may be impacted. This may be particularly relevant for decision-making processes relevant to known difficulties with emotive dysfunction and corresponding reward dysregulation in BD. Participants with bipolar I disorder (BD; n = 44) and non-psychiatric healthy controls (CTL; n = 28) completed three well-validated behavioral economics decision making tasks via a remote-based survey, including loss aversion and framing effects, that examined sensitivity to probabilities and potential gains and losses in monetary and non-monetary domains. Consistent with past work, we found evidence of moderate loss aversion and framing effects across all participants. No group differences were found in any of the measures of loss aversion or framing effects. We report no group differences between bipolar and non-psychiatric groups with respect to loss aversion and framing effects using a remote-based survey approach. These results provide a framework future studies to explore similar tasks in clinical populations and suggest the context and degree to which decision making is altered in BD may be rooted in a more complex cognitive mechanism that warrants future research.Zachary AndersonKim FairleyCynthia M VillanuevaR McKell CarterJune GruberPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 11, p e0258360 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Zachary Anderson Kim Fairley Cynthia M Villanueva R McKell Carter June Gruber No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder.
description	Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with impaired decision making, yet few studies have adopted paradigms from behavioral economics to decompose which, if any, aspects of decision making may be impacted. This may be particularly relevant for decision-making processes relevant to known difficulties with emotive dysfunction and corresponding reward dysregulation in BD. Participants with bipolar I disorder (BD; n = 44) and non-psychiatric healthy controls (CTL; n = 28) completed three well-validated behavioral economics decision making tasks via a remote-based survey, including loss aversion and framing effects, that examined sensitivity to probabilities and potential gains and losses in monetary and non-monetary domains. Consistent with past work, we found evidence of moderate loss aversion and framing effects across all participants. No group differences were found in any of the measures of loss aversion or framing effects. We report no group differences between bipolar and non-psychiatric groups with respect to loss aversion and framing effects using a remote-based survey approach. These results provide a framework future studies to explore similar tasks in clinical populations and suggest the context and degree to which decision making is altered in BD may be rooted in a more complex cognitive mechanism that warrants future research.
format	article
author	Zachary Anderson Kim Fairley Cynthia M Villanueva R McKell Carter June Gruber
author_facet	Zachary Anderson Kim Fairley Cynthia M Villanueva R McKell Carter June Gruber
author_sort	Zachary Anderson
title	No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder.
title_short	No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder.
title_full	No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder.
title_fullStr	No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder.
title_full_unstemmed	No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder.
title_sort	no group differences in traditional economics measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar i disorder.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/8670ef6da509467fa374330f69db514b
work_keys_str_mv	AT zacharyanderson nogroupdifferencesintraditionaleconomicsmeasuresoflossaversionandframingeffectsinbipolaridisorder AT kimfairley nogroupdifferencesintraditionaleconomicsmeasuresoflossaversionandframingeffectsinbipolaridisorder AT cynthiamvillanueva nogroupdifferencesintraditionaleconomicsmeasuresoflossaversionandframingeffectsinbipolaridisorder AT rmckellcarter nogroupdifferencesintraditionaleconomicsmeasuresoflossaversionandframingeffectsinbipolaridisorder AT junegruber nogroupdifferencesintraditionaleconomicsmeasuresoflossaversionandframingeffectsinbipolaridisorder
_version_	1718375253745336320

No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder.

Ejemplares similares