Pest control practices, information sources, and correct pesticide use: Evidence from rice production in China

Substantial pesticide use results in severe negative externalities. The relationship of technology information with pest control practices and pesticide use among farmers is a crucial issue. However, it remains unclear how various information sources impact on farmers’ correct pesticide use. Using c...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shengyang Sun, Ruifa Hu, Chao Zhang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/86af90f3f55240f09b29a92b8d666d40
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:86af90f3f55240f09b29a92b8d666d40
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:86af90f3f55240f09b29a92b8d666d402021-12-01T04:55:17ZPest control practices, information sources, and correct pesticide use: Evidence from rice production in China1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107895https://doaj.org/article/86af90f3f55240f09b29a92b8d666d402021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21005604https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XSubstantial pesticide use results in severe negative externalities. The relationship of technology information with pest control practices and pesticide use among farmers is a crucial issue. However, it remains unclear how various information sources impact on farmers’ correct pesticide use. Using cross-sectional survey data covering 1135 rice-producing farmers in China, this study analyzes farmers’ pest control practices and information sources, and further investigates the impact of information sources on correct pesticide use. Results show that on average each farmer had 3.9 observations in which the applied pesticides well matched the target pests, accounting for 60.8% of a total of 7317 pest-control observations. At the household level, the average percentage of correct-use observations was even smaller than 62%. There were 35.6%, 30.1% and 25.4% of farmers obtaining information regarding pesticide use from personal experience, pesticide retailers and governmental agricultural extension agents, respectively. The Probit and Tobit estimation illustrate that farmers obtaining information regarding pesticide use from personal experience, governmental agricultural extension agents as well as Internet and media had a significantly higher probability and larger percentage of correct pesticide use in rice production, relative to those obtaining information from pesticide retailers. Several policy implications for improving farmers’ pest control practices are discussed.Shengyang SunRuifa HuChao ZhangElsevierarticleInformation sourcePesticide useAgricultural extensionRetailersEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 129, Iss , Pp 107895- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Information source
Pesticide use
Agricultural extension
Retailers
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Information source
Pesticide use
Agricultural extension
Retailers
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Shengyang Sun
Ruifa Hu
Chao Zhang
Pest control practices, information sources, and correct pesticide use: Evidence from rice production in China
description Substantial pesticide use results in severe negative externalities. The relationship of technology information with pest control practices and pesticide use among farmers is a crucial issue. However, it remains unclear how various information sources impact on farmers’ correct pesticide use. Using cross-sectional survey data covering 1135 rice-producing farmers in China, this study analyzes farmers’ pest control practices and information sources, and further investigates the impact of information sources on correct pesticide use. Results show that on average each farmer had 3.9 observations in which the applied pesticides well matched the target pests, accounting for 60.8% of a total of 7317 pest-control observations. At the household level, the average percentage of correct-use observations was even smaller than 62%. There were 35.6%, 30.1% and 25.4% of farmers obtaining information regarding pesticide use from personal experience, pesticide retailers and governmental agricultural extension agents, respectively. The Probit and Tobit estimation illustrate that farmers obtaining information regarding pesticide use from personal experience, governmental agricultural extension agents as well as Internet and media had a significantly higher probability and larger percentage of correct pesticide use in rice production, relative to those obtaining information from pesticide retailers. Several policy implications for improving farmers’ pest control practices are discussed.
format article
author Shengyang Sun
Ruifa Hu
Chao Zhang
author_facet Shengyang Sun
Ruifa Hu
Chao Zhang
author_sort Shengyang Sun
title Pest control practices, information sources, and correct pesticide use: Evidence from rice production in China
title_short Pest control practices, information sources, and correct pesticide use: Evidence from rice production in China
title_full Pest control practices, information sources, and correct pesticide use: Evidence from rice production in China
title_fullStr Pest control practices, information sources, and correct pesticide use: Evidence from rice production in China
title_full_unstemmed Pest control practices, information sources, and correct pesticide use: Evidence from rice production in China
title_sort pest control practices, information sources, and correct pesticide use: evidence from rice production in china
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/86af90f3f55240f09b29a92b8d666d40
work_keys_str_mv AT shengyangsun pestcontrolpracticesinformationsourcesandcorrectpesticideuseevidencefromriceproductioninchina
AT ruifahu pestcontrolpracticesinformationsourcesandcorrectpesticideuseevidencefromriceproductioninchina
AT chaozhang pestcontrolpracticesinformationsourcesandcorrectpesticideuseevidencefromriceproductioninchina
_version_ 1718405671903297536