The state of trial registrations in the field of Orthopaedics in years 2015–2020. A meta-epidemiological study

Objective: To assess the extent and trends in registration of Orthopaedic randomized clinical trials (RCTs) between 2015 and 2020. Design: Epidemiological study. Primary publications of RCTs published in top Orthopaedic journals (ISI Journal Citation Reports 2019 rankings) between 2015 and 2020 were...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Goris Nazari, Dion Diep, Joy C. MacDermid
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Elsevier 2021
Materias:	Randomised clinical trials Transparency State of evidence Orthopaedics Diseases of the musculoskeletal system RC925-935
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/86b822e2269746bc866419249371c763
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:86b822e2269746bc866419249371c763
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:86b822e2269746bc866419249371c7632021-11-24T04:34:21ZThe state of trial registrations in the field of Orthopaedics in years 2015–2020. A meta-epidemiological study2665-913110.1016/j.ocarto.2021.100215https://doaj.org/article/86b822e2269746bc866419249371c7632021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913121000789https://doaj.org/toc/2665-9131Objective: To assess the extent and trends in registration of Orthopaedic randomized clinical trials (RCTs) between 2015 and 2020. Design: Epidemiological study. Primary publications of RCTs published in top Orthopaedic journals (ISI Journal Citation Reports 2019 rankings) between 2015 and 2020 were included in this meta-epidemiological study with no restrictions on patient population, intervention/control groups or outcome type. Independent reviewers in pairs were involved in RCT selection and data extraction. The proportion of RCTs published that were registered (prospectively or retrospectively) or not registered were reported using counts and percentages stratified by years for each journal. Results: A total of 474 primary RCTs were considered eligible. We identified 157 out of 474 RCTs (33% of RCTs across journals) that were reported to have been registered prospectively.The proportion of prospective RCT registrations had increased by 40% (10%–50%) between 2015 and 2020. On the other hand, the proportion of RCTs with no registrations were reduced by 29% (50%–21%) between 2015 and 2020. Conclusion: Prospective RCT registration in the past 5 years in the field of orthopaedic has increased, but 2/3 of published RCTs still failed to report prospective registration.Goris NazariDion DiepJoy C. MacDermidElsevierarticleRandomised clinical trialsTransparencyState of evidenceOrthopaedicsDiseases of the musculoskeletal systemRC925-935ENOsteoarthritis and Cartilage Open, Vol 3, Iss 4, Pp 100215- (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Randomised clinical trials Transparency State of evidence Orthopaedics Diseases of the musculoskeletal system RC925-935
spellingShingle	Randomised clinical trials Transparency State of evidence Orthopaedics Diseases of the musculoskeletal system RC925-935 Goris Nazari Dion Diep Joy C. MacDermid The state of trial registrations in the field of Orthopaedics in years 2015–2020. A meta-epidemiological study
description	Objective: To assess the extent and trends in registration of Orthopaedic randomized clinical trials (RCTs) between 2015 and 2020. Design: Epidemiological study. Primary publications of RCTs published in top Orthopaedic journals (ISI Journal Citation Reports 2019 rankings) between 2015 and 2020 were included in this meta-epidemiological study with no restrictions on patient population, intervention/control groups or outcome type. Independent reviewers in pairs were involved in RCT selection and data extraction. The proportion of RCTs published that were registered (prospectively or retrospectively) or not registered were reported using counts and percentages stratified by years for each journal. Results: A total of 474 primary RCTs were considered eligible. We identified 157 out of 474 RCTs (33% of RCTs across journals) that were reported to have been registered prospectively.The proportion of prospective RCT registrations had increased by 40% (10%–50%) between 2015 and 2020. On the other hand, the proportion of RCTs with no registrations were reduced by 29% (50%–21%) between 2015 and 2020. Conclusion: Prospective RCT registration in the past 5 years in the field of orthopaedic has increased, but 2/3 of published RCTs still failed to report prospective registration.
format	article
author	Goris Nazari Dion Diep Joy C. MacDermid
author_facet	Goris Nazari Dion Diep Joy C. MacDermid
author_sort	Goris Nazari
title	The state of trial registrations in the field of Orthopaedics in years 2015–2020. A meta-epidemiological study
title_short	The state of trial registrations in the field of Orthopaedics in years 2015–2020. A meta-epidemiological study
title_full	The state of trial registrations in the field of Orthopaedics in years 2015–2020. A meta-epidemiological study
title_fullStr	The state of trial registrations in the field of Orthopaedics in years 2015–2020. A meta-epidemiological study
title_full_unstemmed	The state of trial registrations in the field of Orthopaedics in years 2015–2020. A meta-epidemiological study
title_sort	state of trial registrations in the field of orthopaedics in years 2015–2020. a meta-epidemiological study
publisher	Elsevier
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/86b822e2269746bc866419249371c763
work_keys_str_mv	AT gorisnazari thestateoftrialregistrationsinthefieldoforthopaedicsinyears20152020ametaepidemiologicalstudy AT diondiep thestateoftrialregistrationsinthefieldoforthopaedicsinyears20152020ametaepidemiologicalstudy AT joycmacdermid thestateoftrialregistrationsinthefieldoforthopaedicsinyears20152020ametaepidemiologicalstudy AT gorisnazari stateoftrialregistrationsinthefieldoforthopaedicsinyears20152020ametaepidemiologicalstudy AT diondiep stateoftrialregistrationsinthefieldoforthopaedicsinyears20152020ametaepidemiologicalstudy AT joycmacdermid stateoftrialregistrationsinthefieldoforthopaedicsinyears20152020ametaepidemiologicalstudy
_version_	1718415923254132736

The state of trial registrations in the field of Orthopaedics in years 2015–2020. A meta-epidemiological study

Ejemplares similares