The effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine.

<h4>Objectives</h4>To determine whether librarian or information specialist authorship is associated with better reproducibility of the search, at least three databases searched, and better reporting quality in dental systematic reviews (SRs).<h4>Methods</h4>SRs from the top...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jana Schellinger, Kerry Sewell, Jamie E Bloss, Tristan Ebron, Carrie Forbes
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/86b8f9fdf5634039acd1f9fcf125a4e1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:86b8f9fdf5634039acd1f9fcf125a4e1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:86b8f9fdf5634039acd1f9fcf125a4e12021-12-02T20:08:40ZThe effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0256833https://doaj.org/article/86b8f9fdf5634039acd1f9fcf125a4e12021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256833https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Objectives</h4>To determine whether librarian or information specialist authorship is associated with better reproducibility of the search, at least three databases searched, and better reporting quality in dental systematic reviews (SRs).<h4>Methods</h4>SRs from the top ten dental research journals (as determined by Journal Citation Reports and Scimago) were reviewed for search quality and reproducibility by independent reviewers using two Qualtrics survey instruments. Data was reviewed for all SRs based on reproducibility and librarian participation and further reviewed for search quality of reproducible searches.<h4>Results</h4>Librarians were co-authors in only 2.5% of the 913 included SRs and librarians were mentioned or acknowledged in only 9% of included SRs. Librarian coauthors were associated with more reproducible searches, higher search quality, and at least three databases searched. Although the results indicate librarians are associated with improved SR quality, due to the small number of SRs that included a librarian, results were not statistically significant.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Despite guidance from organizations that produce SR guidelines recommending the inclusion of a librarian or information specialist on the review team, and despite evidence showing that librarians improve the reproducibility of searches and the reporting of methodology in SRs, librarians are not being included in SRs in the field of dental medicine. The authors of this review recommend the inclusion of a librarian on SR teams in dental medicine and other fields.Jana SchellingerKerry SewellJamie E BlossTristan EbronCarrie ForbesPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 9, p e0256833 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Jana Schellinger
Kerry Sewell
Jamie E Bloss
Tristan Ebron
Carrie Forbes
The effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine.
description <h4>Objectives</h4>To determine whether librarian or information specialist authorship is associated with better reproducibility of the search, at least three databases searched, and better reporting quality in dental systematic reviews (SRs).<h4>Methods</h4>SRs from the top ten dental research journals (as determined by Journal Citation Reports and Scimago) were reviewed for search quality and reproducibility by independent reviewers using two Qualtrics survey instruments. Data was reviewed for all SRs based on reproducibility and librarian participation and further reviewed for search quality of reproducible searches.<h4>Results</h4>Librarians were co-authors in only 2.5% of the 913 included SRs and librarians were mentioned or acknowledged in only 9% of included SRs. Librarian coauthors were associated with more reproducible searches, higher search quality, and at least three databases searched. Although the results indicate librarians are associated with improved SR quality, due to the small number of SRs that included a librarian, results were not statistically significant.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Despite guidance from organizations that produce SR guidelines recommending the inclusion of a librarian or information specialist on the review team, and despite evidence showing that librarians improve the reproducibility of searches and the reporting of methodology in SRs, librarians are not being included in SRs in the field of dental medicine. The authors of this review recommend the inclusion of a librarian on SR teams in dental medicine and other fields.
format article
author Jana Schellinger
Kerry Sewell
Jamie E Bloss
Tristan Ebron
Carrie Forbes
author_facet Jana Schellinger
Kerry Sewell
Jamie E Bloss
Tristan Ebron
Carrie Forbes
author_sort Jana Schellinger
title The effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine.
title_short The effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine.
title_full The effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine.
title_fullStr The effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine.
title_full_unstemmed The effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine.
title_sort effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/86b8f9fdf5634039acd1f9fcf125a4e1
work_keys_str_mv AT janaschellinger theeffectoflibrarianinvolvementonthequalityofsystematicreviewsindentalmedicine
AT kerrysewell theeffectoflibrarianinvolvementonthequalityofsystematicreviewsindentalmedicine
AT jamieebloss theeffectoflibrarianinvolvementonthequalityofsystematicreviewsindentalmedicine
AT tristanebron theeffectoflibrarianinvolvementonthequalityofsystematicreviewsindentalmedicine
AT carrieforbes theeffectoflibrarianinvolvementonthequalityofsystematicreviewsindentalmedicine
AT janaschellinger effectoflibrarianinvolvementonthequalityofsystematicreviewsindentalmedicine
AT kerrysewell effectoflibrarianinvolvementonthequalityofsystematicreviewsindentalmedicine
AT jamieebloss effectoflibrarianinvolvementonthequalityofsystematicreviewsindentalmedicine
AT tristanebron effectoflibrarianinvolvementonthequalityofsystematicreviewsindentalmedicine
AT carrieforbes effectoflibrarianinvolvementonthequalityofsystematicreviewsindentalmedicine
_version_ 1718375193510936576