Machine Learning Consensus Clustering Approach for Patients with Lactic Acidosis in Intensive Care Units

Background: Lactic acidosis is a heterogeneous condition with multiple underlying causes and associated outcomes. The use of multi-dimensional patient data to subtype lactic acidosis can personalize patient care. Machine learning consensus clustering may identify lactic acidosis subgroups with uniqu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pattharawin Pattharanitima, Charat Thongprayoon, Tananchai Petnak, Narat Srivali, Guido Gembillo, Wisit Kaewput, Supavit Chesdachai, Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula, Oisin A. O’Corragain, Michael A. Mao, Vesna D. Garovic, Fawad Qureshi, John J. Dillon, Wisit Cheungpasitporn
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/86c29d5838dd4925a72d8a5eabca7a70
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:86c29d5838dd4925a72d8a5eabca7a70
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:86c29d5838dd4925a72d8a5eabca7a702021-11-25T18:07:26ZMachine Learning Consensus Clustering Approach for Patients with Lactic Acidosis in Intensive Care Units10.3390/jpm111111322075-4426https://doaj.org/article/86c29d5838dd4925a72d8a5eabca7a702021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/11/1132https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4426Background: Lactic acidosis is a heterogeneous condition with multiple underlying causes and associated outcomes. The use of multi-dimensional patient data to subtype lactic acidosis can personalize patient care. Machine learning consensus clustering may identify lactic acidosis subgroups with unique clinical profiles and outcomes. Methods: We used the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database to abstract electronic medical record data from patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) in a tertiary care hospital in the United States. We included patients who developed lactic acidosis (defined as serum lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L) within 48 h of ICU admission. We performed consensus clustering analysis based on patient characteristics, comorbidities, vital signs, organ supports, and laboratory data to identify clinically distinct lactic acidosis subgroups. We calculated standardized mean differences to show key subgroup features. We compared outcomes among subgroups. Results: We identified 1919 patients with lactic acidosis. The algorithm revealed three best unique lactic acidosis subgroups based on patient variables. Cluster 1 (<i>n</i> = 554) was characterized by old age, elective admission to cardiac surgery ICU, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation use, and higher pH and serum bicarbonate. Cluster 2 (<i>n</i> = 815) was characterized by young age, admission to trauma/surgical ICU with higher blood pressure, lower comorbidity burden, lower severity index, and less vasopressor use. Cluster 3 (<i>n</i> = 550) was characterized by admission to medical ICU, history of liver disease and coagulopathy, acute kidney injury, lower blood pressure, higher comorbidity burden, higher severity index, higher serum lactate, and lower pH and serum bicarbonate. Cluster 3 had the worst outcomes, while cluster 1 had the most favorable outcomes in terms of persistent lactic acidosis and mortality. Conclusions: Consensus clustering analysis synthesized the pattern of clinical and laboratory data to reveal clinically distinct lactic acidosis subgroups with different outcomes.Pattharawin PattharanitimaCharat ThongprayoonTananchai PetnakNarat SrivaliGuido GembilloWisit KaewputSupavit ChesdachaiSaraschandra VallabhajosyulaOisin A. O’CorragainMichael A. MaoVesna D. GarovicFawad QureshiJohn J. DillonWisit CheungpasitpornMDPI AGarticlelactic acidlactic acidosislactatehyperlactatemiaclusteringintensive care unitMedicineRENJournal of Personalized Medicine, Vol 11, Iss 1132, p 1132 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic lactic acid
lactic acidosis
lactate
hyperlactatemia
clustering
intensive care unit
Medicine
R
spellingShingle lactic acid
lactic acidosis
lactate
hyperlactatemia
clustering
intensive care unit
Medicine
R
Pattharawin Pattharanitima
Charat Thongprayoon
Tananchai Petnak
Narat Srivali
Guido Gembillo
Wisit Kaewput
Supavit Chesdachai
Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
Oisin A. O’Corragain
Michael A. Mao
Vesna D. Garovic
Fawad Qureshi
John J. Dillon
Wisit Cheungpasitporn
Machine Learning Consensus Clustering Approach for Patients with Lactic Acidosis in Intensive Care Units
description Background: Lactic acidosis is a heterogeneous condition with multiple underlying causes and associated outcomes. The use of multi-dimensional patient data to subtype lactic acidosis can personalize patient care. Machine learning consensus clustering may identify lactic acidosis subgroups with unique clinical profiles and outcomes. Methods: We used the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database to abstract electronic medical record data from patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) in a tertiary care hospital in the United States. We included patients who developed lactic acidosis (defined as serum lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L) within 48 h of ICU admission. We performed consensus clustering analysis based on patient characteristics, comorbidities, vital signs, organ supports, and laboratory data to identify clinically distinct lactic acidosis subgroups. We calculated standardized mean differences to show key subgroup features. We compared outcomes among subgroups. Results: We identified 1919 patients with lactic acidosis. The algorithm revealed three best unique lactic acidosis subgroups based on patient variables. Cluster 1 (<i>n</i> = 554) was characterized by old age, elective admission to cardiac surgery ICU, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation use, and higher pH and serum bicarbonate. Cluster 2 (<i>n</i> = 815) was characterized by young age, admission to trauma/surgical ICU with higher blood pressure, lower comorbidity burden, lower severity index, and less vasopressor use. Cluster 3 (<i>n</i> = 550) was characterized by admission to medical ICU, history of liver disease and coagulopathy, acute kidney injury, lower blood pressure, higher comorbidity burden, higher severity index, higher serum lactate, and lower pH and serum bicarbonate. Cluster 3 had the worst outcomes, while cluster 1 had the most favorable outcomes in terms of persistent lactic acidosis and mortality. Conclusions: Consensus clustering analysis synthesized the pattern of clinical and laboratory data to reveal clinically distinct lactic acidosis subgroups with different outcomes.
format article
author Pattharawin Pattharanitima
Charat Thongprayoon
Tananchai Petnak
Narat Srivali
Guido Gembillo
Wisit Kaewput
Supavit Chesdachai
Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
Oisin A. O’Corragain
Michael A. Mao
Vesna D. Garovic
Fawad Qureshi
John J. Dillon
Wisit Cheungpasitporn
author_facet Pattharawin Pattharanitima
Charat Thongprayoon
Tananchai Petnak
Narat Srivali
Guido Gembillo
Wisit Kaewput
Supavit Chesdachai
Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
Oisin A. O’Corragain
Michael A. Mao
Vesna D. Garovic
Fawad Qureshi
John J. Dillon
Wisit Cheungpasitporn
author_sort Pattharawin Pattharanitima
title Machine Learning Consensus Clustering Approach for Patients with Lactic Acidosis in Intensive Care Units
title_short Machine Learning Consensus Clustering Approach for Patients with Lactic Acidosis in Intensive Care Units
title_full Machine Learning Consensus Clustering Approach for Patients with Lactic Acidosis in Intensive Care Units
title_fullStr Machine Learning Consensus Clustering Approach for Patients with Lactic Acidosis in Intensive Care Units
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning Consensus Clustering Approach for Patients with Lactic Acidosis in Intensive Care Units
title_sort machine learning consensus clustering approach for patients with lactic acidosis in intensive care units
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/86c29d5838dd4925a72d8a5eabca7a70
work_keys_str_mv AT pattharawinpattharanitima machinelearningconsensusclusteringapproachforpatientswithlacticacidosisinintensivecareunits
AT charatthongprayoon machinelearningconsensusclusteringapproachforpatientswithlacticacidosisinintensivecareunits
AT tananchaipetnak machinelearningconsensusclusteringapproachforpatientswithlacticacidosisinintensivecareunits
AT naratsrivali machinelearningconsensusclusteringapproachforpatientswithlacticacidosisinintensivecareunits
AT guidogembillo machinelearningconsensusclusteringapproachforpatientswithlacticacidosisinintensivecareunits
AT wisitkaewput machinelearningconsensusclusteringapproachforpatientswithlacticacidosisinintensivecareunits
AT supavitchesdachai machinelearningconsensusclusteringapproachforpatientswithlacticacidosisinintensivecareunits
AT saraschandravallabhajosyula machinelearningconsensusclusteringapproachforpatientswithlacticacidosisinintensivecareunits
AT oisinaocorragain machinelearningconsensusclusteringapproachforpatientswithlacticacidosisinintensivecareunits
AT michaelamao machinelearningconsensusclusteringapproachforpatientswithlacticacidosisinintensivecareunits
AT vesnadgarovic machinelearningconsensusclusteringapproachforpatientswithlacticacidosisinintensivecareunits
AT fawadqureshi machinelearningconsensusclusteringapproachforpatientswithlacticacidosisinintensivecareunits
AT johnjdillon machinelearningconsensusclusteringapproachforpatientswithlacticacidosisinintensivecareunits
AT wisitcheungpasitporn machinelearningconsensusclusteringapproachforpatientswithlacticacidosisinintensivecareunits
_version_ 1718411627577999360