A proportional appraisal of smile perception by laypersons, dental professionals, and a smile designing software: An in vivo study
Aim: To equivalence the perception of smile among laypersons, dental professionals and a commercially available popular smile designing software. Settings and Design: In vivo – comparative study. Materials and Methods: A total of 72 participants within age range of 18-30 years were randomly selected...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/86edb9bd014c4920b5e7a5588c509fe8 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:86edb9bd014c4920b5e7a5588c509fe8 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:86edb9bd014c4920b5e7a5588c509fe82021-11-19T10:59:31ZA proportional appraisal of smile perception by laypersons, dental professionals, and a smile designing software: An in vivo study0972-40521998-405710.4103/jips.jips_152_21https://doaj.org/article/86edb9bd014c4920b5e7a5588c509fe82021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.j-ips.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4052;year=2021;volume=21;issue=4;spage=391;epage=396;aulast=Patelhttps://doaj.org/toc/0972-4052https://doaj.org/toc/1998-4057Aim: To equivalence the perception of smile among laypersons, dental professionals and a commercially available popular smile designing software. Settings and Design: In vivo – comparative study. Materials and Methods: A total of 72 participants within age range of 18-30 years were randomly selected with a natural permanent dentition. All the subjects underwent extra oral and intra oral photographic evaluation as per the American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry (AACD) guidelines. A total of 11 evaluators were selected for the study and were divided into four groups. The evaluation procedure comprised of assessment of patients' natural smile by laypersons, dental professionals and a smile designing software. A questionnaire was prepared for recording the responses which included a five-point Likert scale. Statistical Analysis Used: Data was statistically analysed using SPSS version 23. Frequencies and chi square test were done for intergroup comparison. Results: There was a statistically significant difference present in comparison across P < 0.05 all the groups. Conclusions: There was significant difference in the perception of smile among evaluators and a smile designing software. Smile designing software prefers to modify the smile as per in built criteria and is more inclined towards creating an ideal smile.Trushakumari Bhavanbhai PatelSomilkumar MathurSnehal R UpadhyayTakshil Devendra ShahWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticlecomparison of the smileperception of the smilesmile designsmile designing softwareDentistryRK1-715ENThe Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, Vol 21, Iss 4, Pp 391-396 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
comparison of the smile perception of the smile smile design smile designing software Dentistry RK1-715 |
spellingShingle |
comparison of the smile perception of the smile smile design smile designing software Dentistry RK1-715 Trushakumari Bhavanbhai Patel Somilkumar Mathur Snehal R Upadhyay Takshil Devendra Shah A proportional appraisal of smile perception by laypersons, dental professionals, and a smile designing software: An in vivo study |
description |
Aim: To equivalence the perception of smile among laypersons, dental professionals and a commercially available popular smile designing software.
Settings and Design: In vivo – comparative study.
Materials and Methods: A total of 72 participants within age range of 18-30 years were randomly selected with a natural permanent dentition. All the subjects underwent extra oral and intra oral photographic evaluation as per the American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry (AACD) guidelines. A total of 11 evaluators were selected for the study and were divided into four groups. The evaluation procedure comprised of assessment of patients' natural smile by laypersons, dental professionals and a smile designing software. A questionnaire was prepared for recording the responses which included a five-point Likert scale.
Statistical Analysis Used: Data was statistically analysed using SPSS version 23. Frequencies and chi square test were done for intergroup comparison.
Results: There was a statistically significant difference present in comparison across P < 0.05 all the groups.
Conclusions: There was significant difference in the perception of smile among evaluators and a smile designing software. Smile designing software prefers to modify the smile as per in built criteria and is more inclined towards creating an ideal smile. |
format |
article |
author |
Trushakumari Bhavanbhai Patel Somilkumar Mathur Snehal R Upadhyay Takshil Devendra Shah |
author_facet |
Trushakumari Bhavanbhai Patel Somilkumar Mathur Snehal R Upadhyay Takshil Devendra Shah |
author_sort |
Trushakumari Bhavanbhai Patel |
title |
A proportional appraisal of smile perception by laypersons, dental professionals, and a smile designing software: An in vivo study |
title_short |
A proportional appraisal of smile perception by laypersons, dental professionals, and a smile designing software: An in vivo study |
title_full |
A proportional appraisal of smile perception by laypersons, dental professionals, and a smile designing software: An in vivo study |
title_fullStr |
A proportional appraisal of smile perception by laypersons, dental professionals, and a smile designing software: An in vivo study |
title_full_unstemmed |
A proportional appraisal of smile perception by laypersons, dental professionals, and a smile designing software: An in vivo study |
title_sort |
proportional appraisal of smile perception by laypersons, dental professionals, and a smile designing software: an in vivo study |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/86edb9bd014c4920b5e7a5588c509fe8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT trushakumaribhavanbhaipatel aproportionalappraisalofsmileperceptionbylaypersonsdentalprofessionalsandasmiledesigningsoftwareaninvivostudy AT somilkumarmathur aproportionalappraisalofsmileperceptionbylaypersonsdentalprofessionalsandasmiledesigningsoftwareaninvivostudy AT snehalrupadhyay aproportionalappraisalofsmileperceptionbylaypersonsdentalprofessionalsandasmiledesigningsoftwareaninvivostudy AT takshildevendrashah aproportionalappraisalofsmileperceptionbylaypersonsdentalprofessionalsandasmiledesigningsoftwareaninvivostudy AT trushakumaribhavanbhaipatel proportionalappraisalofsmileperceptionbylaypersonsdentalprofessionalsandasmiledesigningsoftwareaninvivostudy AT somilkumarmathur proportionalappraisalofsmileperceptionbylaypersonsdentalprofessionalsandasmiledesigningsoftwareaninvivostudy AT snehalrupadhyay proportionalappraisalofsmileperceptionbylaypersonsdentalprofessionalsandasmiledesigningsoftwareaninvivostudy AT takshildevendrashah proportionalappraisalofsmileperceptionbylaypersonsdentalprofessionalsandasmiledesigningsoftwareaninvivostudy |
_version_ |
1718420144275849216 |