Speaking for Islam

Unexpectedly, one of the marking features of democratization in Niger has been the rise of a variety of Islamic discourses. They focus on the separation between religion and the state and, more precisely, the way it is manifested through the French model of laïcité, which democratization has adopte...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Abdoulaye Sounaye
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: International Institute of Islamic Thought 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8762577e7149436abafe2df6a5d3d5c5
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8762577e7149436abafe2df6a5d3d5c5
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8762577e7149436abafe2df6a5d3d5c52021-12-02T19:41:40ZSpeaking for Islam10.35632/ajis.v26i3.3862690-37332690-3741https://doaj.org/article/8762577e7149436abafe2df6a5d3d5c52009-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/386https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3733https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3741 Unexpectedly, one of the marking features of democratization in Niger has been the rise of a variety of Islamic discourses. They focus on the separation between religion and the state and, more precisely, the way it is manifested through the French model of laïcité, which democratization has adopted in Niger. For many Muslim actors, laïcité amounts to a marginalization of Islamic values and a negation of Islam. This article present three voices: the Collaborators, the Moderates, and the Despisers. Each represents a trend that seeks to influence the state’s political and ideological makeup. Although the ulama in general remain critical vis-à-vis the state’s political and institutional transformation, not all of them reject the principle of the separation between religion and state. The Collaborators suggest cooperation between the religious authority and the political one, the Moderates insist on the necessity for governance to accommodate the people’s will and visions, and the Despisers reject the underpinning liberalism that voids religious authority and demand a total re-Islamization. I argue that what is at stake here is less the separation between state and religion than the modality of this separation and its impact on religious authority. The targets, tones, and justifications of the discourses I explore are evidence of the limitations of a democratization project grounded in laïcité. Thus in place of a secular democratization, they propose a conservative democracy based on Islam and its demands for the realization of the common good. Abdoulaye SounayeInternational Institute of Islamic ThoughtarticleIslamBP1-253ENAmerican Journal of Islam and Society, Vol 26, Iss 3 (2009)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Islam
BP1-253
spellingShingle Islam
BP1-253
Abdoulaye Sounaye
Speaking for Islam
description Unexpectedly, one of the marking features of democratization in Niger has been the rise of a variety of Islamic discourses. They focus on the separation between religion and the state and, more precisely, the way it is manifested through the French model of laïcité, which democratization has adopted in Niger. For many Muslim actors, laïcité amounts to a marginalization of Islamic values and a negation of Islam. This article present three voices: the Collaborators, the Moderates, and the Despisers. Each represents a trend that seeks to influence the state’s political and ideological makeup. Although the ulama in general remain critical vis-à-vis the state’s political and institutional transformation, not all of them reject the principle of the separation between religion and state. The Collaborators suggest cooperation between the religious authority and the political one, the Moderates insist on the necessity for governance to accommodate the people’s will and visions, and the Despisers reject the underpinning liberalism that voids religious authority and demand a total re-Islamization. I argue that what is at stake here is less the separation between state and religion than the modality of this separation and its impact on religious authority. The targets, tones, and justifications of the discourses I explore are evidence of the limitations of a democratization project grounded in laïcité. Thus in place of a secular democratization, they propose a conservative democracy based on Islam and its demands for the realization of the common good.
format article
author Abdoulaye Sounaye
author_facet Abdoulaye Sounaye
author_sort Abdoulaye Sounaye
title Speaking for Islam
title_short Speaking for Islam
title_full Speaking for Islam
title_fullStr Speaking for Islam
title_full_unstemmed Speaking for Islam
title_sort speaking for islam
publisher International Institute of Islamic Thought
publishDate 2009
url https://doaj.org/article/8762577e7149436abafe2df6a5d3d5c5
work_keys_str_mv AT abdoulayesounaye speakingforislam
_version_ 1718376153685688320