An assessment of fixed interval timing in free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): an analysis of individual performance.
Interval timing is a key element of foraging theory, models of predator avoidance, and competitive interactions. Although interval timing is well documented in vertebrate species, it is virtually unstudied in invertebrates. In the present experiment, we used free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera li...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/876420e2d98d4858b404db7d2f6e5fb9 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:876420e2d98d4858b404db7d2f6e5fb9 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:876420e2d98d4858b404db7d2f6e5fb92021-11-25T06:10:06ZAn assessment of fixed interval timing in free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): an analysis of individual performance.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0101262https://doaj.org/article/876420e2d98d4858b404db7d2f6e5fb92014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24983960/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Interval timing is a key element of foraging theory, models of predator avoidance, and competitive interactions. Although interval timing is well documented in vertebrate species, it is virtually unstudied in invertebrates. In the present experiment, we used free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica) as a model for timing behaviors. Subjects were trained to enter a hole in an automated artificial flower to receive a nectar reinforcer (i.e. reward). Responses were continuously reinforced prior to exposure to either a fixed interval (FI) 15-sec, FI 30-sec, FI 60-sec, or FI 120-sec reinforcement schedule. We measured response rate and post-reinforcement pause within each fixed interval trial between reinforcers. Honey bees responded at higher frequencies earlier in the fixed interval suggesting subject responding did not come under traditional forms of temporal control. Response rates were lower during FI conditions compared to performance on continuous reinforcement schedules, and responding was more resistant to extinction when previously reinforced on FI schedules. However, no "scalloped" or "break-and-run" patterns of group or individual responses reinforced on FI schedules were observed; no traditional evidence of temporal control was found. Finally, longer FI schedules eventually caused all subjects to cease returning to the operant chamber indicating subjects did not tolerate the longer FI schedules.David Philip Arthur CraigChristopher A VarnonMichel B C SokolowskiHarrington WellsCharles I AbramsonPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 7, p e101262 (2014) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q David Philip Arthur Craig Christopher A Varnon Michel B C Sokolowski Harrington Wells Charles I Abramson An assessment of fixed interval timing in free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): an analysis of individual performance. |
description |
Interval timing is a key element of foraging theory, models of predator avoidance, and competitive interactions. Although interval timing is well documented in vertebrate species, it is virtually unstudied in invertebrates. In the present experiment, we used free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica) as a model for timing behaviors. Subjects were trained to enter a hole in an automated artificial flower to receive a nectar reinforcer (i.e. reward). Responses were continuously reinforced prior to exposure to either a fixed interval (FI) 15-sec, FI 30-sec, FI 60-sec, or FI 120-sec reinforcement schedule. We measured response rate and post-reinforcement pause within each fixed interval trial between reinforcers. Honey bees responded at higher frequencies earlier in the fixed interval suggesting subject responding did not come under traditional forms of temporal control. Response rates were lower during FI conditions compared to performance on continuous reinforcement schedules, and responding was more resistant to extinction when previously reinforced on FI schedules. However, no "scalloped" or "break-and-run" patterns of group or individual responses reinforced on FI schedules were observed; no traditional evidence of temporal control was found. Finally, longer FI schedules eventually caused all subjects to cease returning to the operant chamber indicating subjects did not tolerate the longer FI schedules. |
format |
article |
author |
David Philip Arthur Craig Christopher A Varnon Michel B C Sokolowski Harrington Wells Charles I Abramson |
author_facet |
David Philip Arthur Craig Christopher A Varnon Michel B C Sokolowski Harrington Wells Charles I Abramson |
author_sort |
David Philip Arthur Craig |
title |
An assessment of fixed interval timing in free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): an analysis of individual performance. |
title_short |
An assessment of fixed interval timing in free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): an analysis of individual performance. |
title_full |
An assessment of fixed interval timing in free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): an analysis of individual performance. |
title_fullStr |
An assessment of fixed interval timing in free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): an analysis of individual performance. |
title_full_unstemmed |
An assessment of fixed interval timing in free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): an analysis of individual performance. |
title_sort |
assessment of fixed interval timing in free-flying honey bees (apis mellifera ligustica): an analysis of individual performance. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/876420e2d98d4858b404db7d2f6e5fb9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT davidphiliparthurcraig anassessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance AT christopheravarnon anassessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance AT michelbcsokolowski anassessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance AT harringtonwells anassessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance AT charlesiabramson anassessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance AT davidphiliparthurcraig assessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance AT christopheravarnon assessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance AT michelbcsokolowski assessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance AT harringtonwells assessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance AT charlesiabramson assessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance |
_version_ |
1718414112615038976 |