An assessment of fixed interval timing in free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): an analysis of individual performance.

Interval timing is a key element of foraging theory, models of predator avoidance, and competitive interactions. Although interval timing is well documented in vertebrate species, it is virtually unstudied in invertebrates. In the present experiment, we used free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera li...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: David Philip Arthur Craig, Christopher A Varnon, Michel B C Sokolowski, Harrington Wells, Charles I Abramson
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/876420e2d98d4858b404db7d2f6e5fb9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:876420e2d98d4858b404db7d2f6e5fb9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:876420e2d98d4858b404db7d2f6e5fb92021-11-25T06:10:06ZAn assessment of fixed interval timing in free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): an analysis of individual performance.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0101262https://doaj.org/article/876420e2d98d4858b404db7d2f6e5fb92014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24983960/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Interval timing is a key element of foraging theory, models of predator avoidance, and competitive interactions. Although interval timing is well documented in vertebrate species, it is virtually unstudied in invertebrates. In the present experiment, we used free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica) as a model for timing behaviors. Subjects were trained to enter a hole in an automated artificial flower to receive a nectar reinforcer (i.e. reward). Responses were continuously reinforced prior to exposure to either a fixed interval (FI) 15-sec, FI 30-sec, FI 60-sec, or FI 120-sec reinforcement schedule. We measured response rate and post-reinforcement pause within each fixed interval trial between reinforcers. Honey bees responded at higher frequencies earlier in the fixed interval suggesting subject responding did not come under traditional forms of temporal control. Response rates were lower during FI conditions compared to performance on continuous reinforcement schedules, and responding was more resistant to extinction when previously reinforced on FI schedules. However, no "scalloped" or "break-and-run" patterns of group or individual responses reinforced on FI schedules were observed; no traditional evidence of temporal control was found. Finally, longer FI schedules eventually caused all subjects to cease returning to the operant chamber indicating subjects did not tolerate the longer FI schedules.David Philip Arthur CraigChristopher A VarnonMichel B C SokolowskiHarrington WellsCharles I AbramsonPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 7, p e101262 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
David Philip Arthur Craig
Christopher A Varnon
Michel B C Sokolowski
Harrington Wells
Charles I Abramson
An assessment of fixed interval timing in free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): an analysis of individual performance.
description Interval timing is a key element of foraging theory, models of predator avoidance, and competitive interactions. Although interval timing is well documented in vertebrate species, it is virtually unstudied in invertebrates. In the present experiment, we used free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica) as a model for timing behaviors. Subjects were trained to enter a hole in an automated artificial flower to receive a nectar reinforcer (i.e. reward). Responses were continuously reinforced prior to exposure to either a fixed interval (FI) 15-sec, FI 30-sec, FI 60-sec, or FI 120-sec reinforcement schedule. We measured response rate and post-reinforcement pause within each fixed interval trial between reinforcers. Honey bees responded at higher frequencies earlier in the fixed interval suggesting subject responding did not come under traditional forms of temporal control. Response rates were lower during FI conditions compared to performance on continuous reinforcement schedules, and responding was more resistant to extinction when previously reinforced on FI schedules. However, no "scalloped" or "break-and-run" patterns of group or individual responses reinforced on FI schedules were observed; no traditional evidence of temporal control was found. Finally, longer FI schedules eventually caused all subjects to cease returning to the operant chamber indicating subjects did not tolerate the longer FI schedules.
format article
author David Philip Arthur Craig
Christopher A Varnon
Michel B C Sokolowski
Harrington Wells
Charles I Abramson
author_facet David Philip Arthur Craig
Christopher A Varnon
Michel B C Sokolowski
Harrington Wells
Charles I Abramson
author_sort David Philip Arthur Craig
title An assessment of fixed interval timing in free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): an analysis of individual performance.
title_short An assessment of fixed interval timing in free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): an analysis of individual performance.
title_full An assessment of fixed interval timing in free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): an analysis of individual performance.
title_fullStr An assessment of fixed interval timing in free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): an analysis of individual performance.
title_full_unstemmed An assessment of fixed interval timing in free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica): an analysis of individual performance.
title_sort assessment of fixed interval timing in free-flying honey bees (apis mellifera ligustica): an analysis of individual performance.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/876420e2d98d4858b404db7d2f6e5fb9
work_keys_str_mv AT davidphiliparthurcraig anassessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance
AT christopheravarnon anassessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance
AT michelbcsokolowski anassessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance
AT harringtonwells anassessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance
AT charlesiabramson anassessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance
AT davidphiliparthurcraig assessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance
AT christopheravarnon assessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance
AT michelbcsokolowski assessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance
AT harringtonwells assessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance
AT charlesiabramson assessmentoffixedintervaltiminginfreeflyinghoneybeesapismelliferaligusticaananalysisofindividualperformance
_version_ 1718414112615038976