A comparison of MRI tissue relaxometry and ROI methods used to determine regional brain iron concentrations in restless legs syndrome

Hye-Jin Moon,1,* Yongmin Chang,2,* Yeong Seon Lee,1 Huijin Song,3 Hyuk Won Chang,4 Jeonghun Ku,5 Richard P Allen,6 Christopher J Earley,6 Yong Won Cho1 1Department of Neurology, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea; 2Department of Molecular Medicin...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moon HJ, Chang YM, Lee YS, Song HJ, Chang HW, Ku J, Allen RP, Earley CJ, Cho YW
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/879c2ca4a9704f3e99b8ff7759b25586
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:879c2ca4a9704f3e99b8ff7759b25586
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:879c2ca4a9704f3e99b8ff7759b255862021-12-02T06:08:15ZA comparison of MRI tissue relaxometry and ROI methods used to determine regional brain iron concentrations in restless legs syndrome1179-1470https://doaj.org/article/879c2ca4a9704f3e99b8ff7759b255862015-07-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/a-comparison-of-mri-tissue-relaxometry-and-roi-methods-used-to-determi-peer-reviewed-article-MDERhttps://doaj.org/toc/1179-1470Hye-Jin Moon,1,* Yongmin Chang,2,* Yeong Seon Lee,1 Huijin Song,3 Hyuk Won Chang,4 Jeonghun Ku,5 Richard P Allen,6 Christopher J Earley,6 Yong Won Cho1 1Department of Neurology, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea; 2Department of Molecular Medicine, 3Department of Medical and Biological Engineering, Kyungpook National University and Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; 4Department of Radiology, 5Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; 6Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA *These authors contributed equally to this work Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging relaxometry studies differed on the relaxometry methods and their approaches to determining the regions of interest (ROIs) in restless legs syndrome (RLS) patients. These differences could account for the variable and inconsistent results found across these studies. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the different relaxometry methods and different ROI approaches using each of these methods on a single population of controls and RLS subjects. Methods: A 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging with the gradient-echo sampling of free induction decay and echo pulse sequence was used. The regional brain “iron concentrations” were determined using three relaxometry metrics (R2, R2*, and R2') through two different ROI methods. The substantia nigra (SN) was the primary ROI with red nucleus, caudate, putamen, and globus pallidus as the secondary ROIs. Results: Thirty-seven RLS patients and 40 controls were enrolled. The iron concentration as determined by R2 did not correlate with either of the other two methods, while R2* and R2' showed strong correlations, particularly for the substantia nigra and red nucleus. In the fixed-shape ROI method, the RLS group showed a lower iron index compared to the control group in the substantia nigra and several other regions. With the semi-automated ROI method, however, only the red nucleus showed a significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: Both the relaxometry and ROI determination methods significantly influenced the outcome of studies that used these methods to estimate regional brain iron concentrations. Keywords: restless legs syndrome, relaxometry, region of interest, substantia nigra, ironMoon HJChang YMLee YSSong HJChang HWKu JAllen RPEarley CJCho YWDove Medical PressarticleMedical technologyR855-855.5ENMedical Devices: Evidence and Research, Vol 2015, Iss default, Pp 341-350 (2015)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medical technology
R855-855.5
spellingShingle Medical technology
R855-855.5
Moon HJ
Chang YM
Lee YS
Song HJ
Chang HW
Ku J
Allen RP
Earley CJ
Cho YW
A comparison of MRI tissue relaxometry and ROI methods used to determine regional brain iron concentrations in restless legs syndrome
description Hye-Jin Moon,1,* Yongmin Chang,2,* Yeong Seon Lee,1 Huijin Song,3 Hyuk Won Chang,4 Jeonghun Ku,5 Richard P Allen,6 Christopher J Earley,6 Yong Won Cho1 1Department of Neurology, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea; 2Department of Molecular Medicine, 3Department of Medical and Biological Engineering, Kyungpook National University and Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; 4Department of Radiology, 5Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; 6Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA *These authors contributed equally to this work Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging relaxometry studies differed on the relaxometry methods and their approaches to determining the regions of interest (ROIs) in restless legs syndrome (RLS) patients. These differences could account for the variable and inconsistent results found across these studies. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the different relaxometry methods and different ROI approaches using each of these methods on a single population of controls and RLS subjects. Methods: A 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging with the gradient-echo sampling of free induction decay and echo pulse sequence was used. The regional brain “iron concentrations” were determined using three relaxometry metrics (R2, R2*, and R2') through two different ROI methods. The substantia nigra (SN) was the primary ROI with red nucleus, caudate, putamen, and globus pallidus as the secondary ROIs. Results: Thirty-seven RLS patients and 40 controls were enrolled. The iron concentration as determined by R2 did not correlate with either of the other two methods, while R2* and R2' showed strong correlations, particularly for the substantia nigra and red nucleus. In the fixed-shape ROI method, the RLS group showed a lower iron index compared to the control group in the substantia nigra and several other regions. With the semi-automated ROI method, however, only the red nucleus showed a significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: Both the relaxometry and ROI determination methods significantly influenced the outcome of studies that used these methods to estimate regional brain iron concentrations. Keywords: restless legs syndrome, relaxometry, region of interest, substantia nigra, iron
format article
author Moon HJ
Chang YM
Lee YS
Song HJ
Chang HW
Ku J
Allen RP
Earley CJ
Cho YW
author_facet Moon HJ
Chang YM
Lee YS
Song HJ
Chang HW
Ku J
Allen RP
Earley CJ
Cho YW
author_sort Moon HJ
title A comparison of MRI tissue relaxometry and ROI methods used to determine regional brain iron concentrations in restless legs syndrome
title_short A comparison of MRI tissue relaxometry and ROI methods used to determine regional brain iron concentrations in restless legs syndrome
title_full A comparison of MRI tissue relaxometry and ROI methods used to determine regional brain iron concentrations in restless legs syndrome
title_fullStr A comparison of MRI tissue relaxometry and ROI methods used to determine regional brain iron concentrations in restless legs syndrome
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of MRI tissue relaxometry and ROI methods used to determine regional brain iron concentrations in restless legs syndrome
title_sort comparison of mri tissue relaxometry and roi methods used to determine regional brain iron concentrations in restless legs syndrome
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2015
url https://doaj.org/article/879c2ca4a9704f3e99b8ff7759b25586
work_keys_str_mv AT moonhj acomparisonofmritissuerelaxometryandroimethodsusedtodetermineregionalbrainironconcentrationsinrestlesslegssyndrome
AT changym acomparisonofmritissuerelaxometryandroimethodsusedtodetermineregionalbrainironconcentrationsinrestlesslegssyndrome
AT leeys acomparisonofmritissuerelaxometryandroimethodsusedtodetermineregionalbrainironconcentrationsinrestlesslegssyndrome
AT songhj acomparisonofmritissuerelaxometryandroimethodsusedtodetermineregionalbrainironconcentrationsinrestlesslegssyndrome
AT changhw acomparisonofmritissuerelaxometryandroimethodsusedtodetermineregionalbrainironconcentrationsinrestlesslegssyndrome
AT kuj acomparisonofmritissuerelaxometryandroimethodsusedtodetermineregionalbrainironconcentrationsinrestlesslegssyndrome
AT allenrp acomparisonofmritissuerelaxometryandroimethodsusedtodetermineregionalbrainironconcentrationsinrestlesslegssyndrome
AT earleycj acomparisonofmritissuerelaxometryandroimethodsusedtodetermineregionalbrainironconcentrationsinrestlesslegssyndrome
AT choyw acomparisonofmritissuerelaxometryandroimethodsusedtodetermineregionalbrainironconcentrationsinrestlesslegssyndrome
AT moonhj comparisonofmritissuerelaxometryandroimethodsusedtodetermineregionalbrainironconcentrationsinrestlesslegssyndrome
AT changym comparisonofmritissuerelaxometryandroimethodsusedtodetermineregionalbrainironconcentrationsinrestlesslegssyndrome
AT leeys comparisonofmritissuerelaxometryandroimethodsusedtodetermineregionalbrainironconcentrationsinrestlesslegssyndrome
AT songhj comparisonofmritissuerelaxometryandroimethodsusedtodetermineregionalbrainironconcentrationsinrestlesslegssyndrome
AT changhw comparisonofmritissuerelaxometryandroimethodsusedtodetermineregionalbrainironconcentrationsinrestlesslegssyndrome
AT kuj comparisonofmritissuerelaxometryandroimethodsusedtodetermineregionalbrainironconcentrationsinrestlesslegssyndrome
AT allenrp comparisonofmritissuerelaxometryandroimethodsusedtodetermineregionalbrainironconcentrationsinrestlesslegssyndrome
AT earleycj comparisonofmritissuerelaxometryandroimethodsusedtodetermineregionalbrainironconcentrationsinrestlesslegssyndrome
AT choyw comparisonofmritissuerelaxometryandroimethodsusedtodetermineregionalbrainironconcentrationsinrestlesslegssyndrome
_version_ 1718400062838538240