A multidimensional stability framework enhances interpretation and comparison of carbon cycling response to disturbance

Abstract The concept of stability is central to the study and sustainability of vital ecosystem goods and services as disturbances increase globally. While ecosystem ecologists, including carbon (C) cycling scientists, have long‐considered multiple dimensions of disturbance response, our discipline...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Kayla C. Mathes, Yang Ju, Callie Kleinke, Callie Oldfield, Gil Bohrer, Ben Bond‐Lamberty, Christoph S. Vogel, Kalyn Dorheim, Christopher M. Gough
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Wiley 2021
Materias:	carbon disturbance ecosystem ecology forests resilience resistance Ecology QH540-549.5
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/87e6744d4f934774913b831d7424aa21
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:87e6744d4f934774913b831d7424aa21
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:87e6744d4f934774913b831d7424aa212021-11-29T07:06:42ZA multidimensional stability framework enhances interpretation and comparison of carbon cycling response to disturbance2150-892510.1002/ecs2.3800https://doaj.org/article/87e6744d4f934774913b831d7424aa212021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3800https://doaj.org/toc/2150-8925Abstract The concept of stability is central to the study and sustainability of vital ecosystem goods and services as disturbances increase globally. While ecosystem ecologists, including carbon (C) cycling scientists, have long‐considered multiple dimensions of disturbance response, our discipline lacks an agreed‐upon analytical framework for characterizing multidimensional stability. Here, we advocate for the broader adoption of a standardized and normalized multidimensional stability framework for analyzing disturbance response. This framework includes four dimensions of stability: the degree of initial change in C fluxes (i.e., resistance); rate (i.e., resilience) and variability (i.e., temporal stability) of return to pre‐disturbance C fluxes; and the extent of return to pre‐disturbance C fluxes (i.e., recovery). Using this framework, we highlight findings not readily seen from analysis of absolute fluxes, including trade‐offs between initial and long‐term C flux responses to disturbance; different overall stability profiles among fluxes; and, using a pilot dataset, similar relative stability of net primary production following fire and insect disturbances. We conclude that ecosystem ecologists’ embrace of a unifying multidimensional stability framework as a complement to approaches focused on absolute C fluxes could advance global change research by aiding in the novel interpretation, comprehensive synthesis, and improved forecasting of ecosystems’ response to an increasing array of disturbances.Kayla C. MathesYang JuCallie KleinkeCallie OldfieldGil BohrerBen Bond‐LambertyChristoph S. VogelKalyn DorheimChristopher M. GoughWileyarticlecarbondisturbanceecosystem ecologyforestsresilienceresistanceEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcosphere, Vol 12, Iss 11, Pp n/a-n/a (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	carbon disturbance ecosystem ecology forests resilience resistance Ecology QH540-549.5
spellingShingle	carbon disturbance ecosystem ecology forests resilience resistance Ecology QH540-549.5 Kayla C. Mathes Yang Ju Callie Kleinke Callie Oldfield Gil Bohrer Ben Bond‐Lamberty Christoph S. Vogel Kalyn Dorheim Christopher M. Gough A multidimensional stability framework enhances interpretation and comparison of carbon cycling response to disturbance
description	Abstract The concept of stability is central to the study and sustainability of vital ecosystem goods and services as disturbances increase globally. While ecosystem ecologists, including carbon (C) cycling scientists, have long‐considered multiple dimensions of disturbance response, our discipline lacks an agreed‐upon analytical framework for characterizing multidimensional stability. Here, we advocate for the broader adoption of a standardized and normalized multidimensional stability framework for analyzing disturbance response. This framework includes four dimensions of stability: the degree of initial change in C fluxes (i.e., resistance); rate (i.e., resilience) and variability (i.e., temporal stability) of return to pre‐disturbance C fluxes; and the extent of return to pre‐disturbance C fluxes (i.e., recovery). Using this framework, we highlight findings not readily seen from analysis of absolute fluxes, including trade‐offs between initial and long‐term C flux responses to disturbance; different overall stability profiles among fluxes; and, using a pilot dataset, similar relative stability of net primary production following fire and insect disturbances. We conclude that ecosystem ecologists’ embrace of a unifying multidimensional stability framework as a complement to approaches focused on absolute C fluxes could advance global change research by aiding in the novel interpretation, comprehensive synthesis, and improved forecasting of ecosystems’ response to an increasing array of disturbances.
format	article
author	Kayla C. Mathes Yang Ju Callie Kleinke Callie Oldfield Gil Bohrer Ben Bond‐Lamberty Christoph S. Vogel Kalyn Dorheim Christopher M. Gough
author_facet	Kayla C. Mathes Yang Ju Callie Kleinke Callie Oldfield Gil Bohrer Ben Bond‐Lamberty Christoph S. Vogel Kalyn Dorheim Christopher M. Gough
author_sort	Kayla C. Mathes
title	A multidimensional stability framework enhances interpretation and comparison of carbon cycling response to disturbance
title_short	A multidimensional stability framework enhances interpretation and comparison of carbon cycling response to disturbance
title_full	A multidimensional stability framework enhances interpretation and comparison of carbon cycling response to disturbance
title_fullStr	A multidimensional stability framework enhances interpretation and comparison of carbon cycling response to disturbance
title_full_unstemmed	A multidimensional stability framework enhances interpretation and comparison of carbon cycling response to disturbance
title_sort	multidimensional stability framework enhances interpretation and comparison of carbon cycling response to disturbance
publisher	Wiley
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/87e6744d4f934774913b831d7424aa21
work_keys_str_mv	AT kaylacmathes amultidimensionalstabilityframeworkenhancesinterpretationandcomparisonofcarboncyclingresponsetodisturbance AT yangju amultidimensionalstabilityframeworkenhancesinterpretationandcomparisonofcarboncyclingresponsetodisturbance AT calliekleinke amultidimensionalstabilityframeworkenhancesinterpretationandcomparisonofcarboncyclingresponsetodisturbance AT callieoldfield amultidimensionalstabilityframeworkenhancesinterpretationandcomparisonofcarboncyclingresponsetodisturbance AT gilbohrer amultidimensionalstabilityframeworkenhancesinterpretationandcomparisonofcarboncyclingresponsetodisturbance AT benbondlamberty amultidimensionalstabilityframeworkenhancesinterpretationandcomparisonofcarboncyclingresponsetodisturbance AT christophsvogel amultidimensionalstabilityframeworkenhancesinterpretationandcomparisonofcarboncyclingresponsetodisturbance AT kalyndorheim amultidimensionalstabilityframeworkenhancesinterpretationandcomparisonofcarboncyclingresponsetodisturbance AT christophermgough amultidimensionalstabilityframeworkenhancesinterpretationandcomparisonofcarboncyclingresponsetodisturbance AT kaylacmathes multidimensionalstabilityframeworkenhancesinterpretationandcomparisonofcarboncyclingresponsetodisturbance AT yangju multidimensionalstabilityframeworkenhancesinterpretationandcomparisonofcarboncyclingresponsetodisturbance AT calliekleinke multidimensionalstabilityframeworkenhancesinterpretationandcomparisonofcarboncyclingresponsetodisturbance AT callieoldfield multidimensionalstabilityframeworkenhancesinterpretationandcomparisonofcarboncyclingresponsetodisturbance AT gilbohrer multidimensionalstabilityframeworkenhancesinterpretationandcomparisonofcarboncyclingresponsetodisturbance AT benbondlamberty multidimensionalstabilityframeworkenhancesinterpretationandcomparisonofcarboncyclingresponsetodisturbance AT christophsvogel multidimensionalstabilityframeworkenhancesinterpretationandcomparisonofcarboncyclingresponsetodisturbance AT kalyndorheim multidimensionalstabilityframeworkenhancesinterpretationandcomparisonofcarboncyclingresponsetodisturbance AT christophermgough multidimensionalstabilityframeworkenhancesinterpretationandcomparisonofcarboncyclingresponsetodisturbance
_version_	1718407537698537472

A multidimensional stability framework enhances interpretation and comparison of carbon cycling response to disturbance

Ejemplares similares