Choice of biodiversity indicators may affect societal support for conservation programs

Preservation and sustainable use of biodiversity brings multiple health, societal and economic benefits, including life-supporting services. Biodiversity indicators are important in framing the benefits of conservation and management programs and monitoring progress toward their outcomes. Biodiversi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: María Martínez-Jauregui, Julia Touza, Piran C.L. White, Mario Soliño
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/87eab279910f4ae8ba5c1b8d35fe36ee
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:87eab279910f4ae8ba5c1b8d35fe36ee
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:87eab279910f4ae8ba5c1b8d35fe36ee2021-12-01T04:38:44ZChoice of biodiversity indicators may affect societal support for conservation programs1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107203https://doaj.org/article/87eab279910f4ae8ba5c1b8d35fe36ee2021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X20311420https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XPreservation and sustainable use of biodiversity brings multiple health, societal and economic benefits, including life-supporting services. Biodiversity indicators are important in framing the benefits of conservation and management programs and monitoring progress toward their outcomes. Biodiversity indicators therefore provide useful tools for policymakers in helping to communicate the benefits of conservation to society but also in garnering public support for conservation. This research aimed to help improve our understanding of the role of biodiversity indicators in the way that they influence preferences towards conservation programs. A discrete choice experiment was used to estimate relative societal preferences towards multilevel dimensions of biodiversity in relation to the conservation of pine forests in the Spanish Iberian Peninsula. Results show that (i) the level of biodiversity indicator (within species, between species and within ecosystems) matters, (ii) indicators related to the biodiversity within ecosystems are valued the most, and (iii) the use of several biodiversity indicators together is generally better at delivering benefits to society, but the value of these is reduced where there is redundancy between them. Overall, the most preferred indicators were the area of land covered by the conservation project, the status of keystone ecosystem components, and the number of native species. Some indicators such as invasive alien species and genetic diversity are least preferred and may be less helpful to how conservation efforts are perceived by the citizens. By careful consideration of which biodiversity indicators to use, policymakers and conservation managers can maximize societal acceptability of public investments in conservation efforts.María Martínez-JaureguiJulia TouzaPiran C.L. WhiteMario SoliñoElsevierarticleChoice experimentDiversity distributionGenetic diversityInvasive speciesKeystone speciesPine forestEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 121, Iss , Pp 107203- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Choice experiment
Diversity distribution
Genetic diversity
Invasive species
Keystone species
Pine forest
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Choice experiment
Diversity distribution
Genetic diversity
Invasive species
Keystone species
Pine forest
Ecology
QH540-549.5
María Martínez-Jauregui
Julia Touza
Piran C.L. White
Mario Soliño
Choice of biodiversity indicators may affect societal support for conservation programs
description Preservation and sustainable use of biodiversity brings multiple health, societal and economic benefits, including life-supporting services. Biodiversity indicators are important in framing the benefits of conservation and management programs and monitoring progress toward their outcomes. Biodiversity indicators therefore provide useful tools for policymakers in helping to communicate the benefits of conservation to society but also in garnering public support for conservation. This research aimed to help improve our understanding of the role of biodiversity indicators in the way that they influence preferences towards conservation programs. A discrete choice experiment was used to estimate relative societal preferences towards multilevel dimensions of biodiversity in relation to the conservation of pine forests in the Spanish Iberian Peninsula. Results show that (i) the level of biodiversity indicator (within species, between species and within ecosystems) matters, (ii) indicators related to the biodiversity within ecosystems are valued the most, and (iii) the use of several biodiversity indicators together is generally better at delivering benefits to society, but the value of these is reduced where there is redundancy between them. Overall, the most preferred indicators were the area of land covered by the conservation project, the status of keystone ecosystem components, and the number of native species. Some indicators such as invasive alien species and genetic diversity are least preferred and may be less helpful to how conservation efforts are perceived by the citizens. By careful consideration of which biodiversity indicators to use, policymakers and conservation managers can maximize societal acceptability of public investments in conservation efforts.
format article
author María Martínez-Jauregui
Julia Touza
Piran C.L. White
Mario Soliño
author_facet María Martínez-Jauregui
Julia Touza
Piran C.L. White
Mario Soliño
author_sort María Martínez-Jauregui
title Choice of biodiversity indicators may affect societal support for conservation programs
title_short Choice of biodiversity indicators may affect societal support for conservation programs
title_full Choice of biodiversity indicators may affect societal support for conservation programs
title_fullStr Choice of biodiversity indicators may affect societal support for conservation programs
title_full_unstemmed Choice of biodiversity indicators may affect societal support for conservation programs
title_sort choice of biodiversity indicators may affect societal support for conservation programs
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/87eab279910f4ae8ba5c1b8d35fe36ee
work_keys_str_mv AT mariamartinezjauregui choiceofbiodiversityindicatorsmayaffectsocietalsupportforconservationprograms
AT juliatouza choiceofbiodiversityindicatorsmayaffectsocietalsupportforconservationprograms
AT piranclwhite choiceofbiodiversityindicatorsmayaffectsocietalsupportforconservationprograms
AT mariosolino choiceofbiodiversityindicatorsmayaffectsocietalsupportforconservationprograms
_version_ 1718405855049678848