Track and Trace, and Other Collaborative Art/Archaeology Bubbles in the Phygital Pandemic
This paper describes our creative responses to a surface assemblage (a scatter) of lithic artefacts encountered on either side of a worn track across a field early on in the pandemic. Our art/archaeology response takes place within a phygital nexus in which artefacts or assemblages can be instantiat...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
De Gruyter
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/87f286008dfe409192fa967a0c6b740a |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:87f286008dfe409192fa967a0c6b740a |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:87f286008dfe409192fa967a0c6b740a2021-12-05T14:10:59ZTrack and Trace, and Other Collaborative Art/Archaeology Bubbles in the Phygital Pandemic2300-656010.1515/opar-2020-0137https://doaj.org/article/87f286008dfe409192fa967a0c6b740a2021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2020-0137https://doaj.org/toc/2300-6560This paper describes our creative responses to a surface assemblage (a scatter) of lithic artefacts encountered on either side of a worn track across a field early on in the pandemic. Our art/archaeology response takes place within a phygital nexus in which artefacts or assemblages can be instantiated either physically or digitally, or both. In the nexus we create, connect and explore an ontological multiplicity of – more or less – physical and digital skeuomorphs and other more standard forms of records for sharing (i.e. Latour’s immutable mobiles, such as photographs), but rendered with radically different properties and affordances, at different scales, with different apparatus. These include interactive Reflectance Transformation Images, graphical surface models, machine intelligence style transfer, and 3D prints, all of which were produced in a variety of isolated analytical “bubble” settings and transmitted to and from (both digitally and physically) a home office in an isolated Hampshire village and a home studio in a London suburb. Our approach is to describe, diffractively, the ontological shifts and itineraries associated with some of these objects and assess how this assemblage came to matter as an art/archaeology installation. Ultimately, some of these deterritorialised, (re)colourised, affective, biodegradable, and diffractively born metamorphic instars, now inscribed with new meanings, are returned to the original findspot of the lithics to be (re)discovered.Reilly PaulDawson IanDe Gruyterarticle3d printingart/archaeologycognitive assemblagesdiffractionphygitalArchaeologyCC1-960ENOpen Archaeology, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 291-313 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
3d printing art/archaeology cognitive assemblages diffraction phygital Archaeology CC1-960 |
spellingShingle |
3d printing art/archaeology cognitive assemblages diffraction phygital Archaeology CC1-960 Reilly Paul Dawson Ian Track and Trace, and Other Collaborative Art/Archaeology Bubbles in the Phygital Pandemic |
description |
This paper describes our creative responses to a surface assemblage (a scatter) of lithic artefacts encountered on either side of a worn track across a field early on in the pandemic. Our art/archaeology response takes place within a phygital nexus in which artefacts or assemblages can be instantiated either physically or digitally, or both. In the nexus we create, connect and explore an ontological multiplicity of – more or less – physical and digital skeuomorphs and other more standard forms of records for sharing (i.e. Latour’s immutable mobiles, such as photographs), but rendered with radically different properties and affordances, at different scales, with different apparatus. These include interactive Reflectance Transformation Images, graphical surface models, machine intelligence style transfer, and 3D prints, all of which were produced in a variety of isolated analytical “bubble” settings and transmitted to and from (both digitally and physically) a home office in an isolated Hampshire village and a home studio in a London suburb. Our approach is to describe, diffractively, the ontological shifts and itineraries associated with some of these objects and assess how this assemblage came to matter as an art/archaeology installation. Ultimately, some of these deterritorialised, (re)colourised, affective, biodegradable, and diffractively born metamorphic instars, now inscribed with new meanings, are returned to the original findspot of the lithics to be (re)discovered. |
format |
article |
author |
Reilly Paul Dawson Ian |
author_facet |
Reilly Paul Dawson Ian |
author_sort |
Reilly Paul |
title |
Track and Trace, and Other Collaborative Art/Archaeology Bubbles in the Phygital Pandemic |
title_short |
Track and Trace, and Other Collaborative Art/Archaeology Bubbles in the Phygital Pandemic |
title_full |
Track and Trace, and Other Collaborative Art/Archaeology Bubbles in the Phygital Pandemic |
title_fullStr |
Track and Trace, and Other Collaborative Art/Archaeology Bubbles in the Phygital Pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed |
Track and Trace, and Other Collaborative Art/Archaeology Bubbles in the Phygital Pandemic |
title_sort |
track and trace, and other collaborative art/archaeology bubbles in the phygital pandemic |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/87f286008dfe409192fa967a0c6b740a |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT reillypaul trackandtraceandothercollaborativeartarchaeologybubblesinthephygitalpandemic AT dawsonian trackandtraceandothercollaborativeartarchaeologybubblesinthephygitalpandemic |
_version_ |
1718371552087506944 |