Differences in sepsis treatment and outcomes between public and private hospitals in Brazil: a multicenter observational study.

<h4>Background</h4>Previous studies showed higher sepsis mortality rates in Brazil compared to other developed or developing countries. Moreover, another trial demonstrated an increased mortality rate in public hospitals compared to private hospitals in Brazil. The reasons for these find...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katia Aparecida Pessoa Conde, Eliezer Silva, Carla Oliveira Silva, Elaine Ferreira, Flavio Geraldo Rezende Freitas, Isac Castro, Alvaro Rea-Neto, Cintia Magalhaes Carvalho Grion, Anselmo Dornas Moura, Suzana Margareth Lobo, Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo, Flavia Ribeiro Machado
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/884f524e314b49e4bc03844aa33ac60c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:884f524e314b49e4bc03844aa33ac60c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:884f524e314b49e4bc03844aa33ac60c2021-11-18T07:42:49ZDifferences in sepsis treatment and outcomes between public and private hospitals in Brazil: a multicenter observational study.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0064790https://doaj.org/article/884f524e314b49e4bc03844aa33ac60c2013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23762255/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Previous studies showed higher sepsis mortality rates in Brazil compared to other developed or developing countries. Moreover, another trial demonstrated an increased mortality rate in public hospitals compared to private hospitals in Brazil. The reasons for these findings may include delayed recognition and inadequate treatment of sepsis in public facilities. We designed this study to evaluate the factors associated with mortality in septic patients admitted to intensive care units in a network of public and private institutions.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>This study is a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort of sepsis patients in 19 private and public institutions in Brazil. We analyzed data from the original database and collected additional data to assess compliance to the treatment guidelines and to determine the time from the onset of organ dysfunction and the sepsis diagnosis by the healthcare team.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 396 patients were analyzed. Patients in public hospitals were younger, had a greater number of dysfunctional organs at baseline and a lower chance to have sepsis diagnosed within two hours of the onset of organ dysfunction. Private hospitals had a better compliance to lactate and blood culture sampling and maintenance of glycemic control. The multivariate analysis showed that age, disease severity at baseline and being treated at a public hospital were independent risk factors for mortality. A delay in the sepsis diagnosis of longer than two hours was associated with mortality only in the public setting.<h4>Conclusions</h4>We confirmed a lower sepsis mortality rate in the private hospitals of this network. Being treated in a public hospital was an independent factor for mortality. Delayed recognition of sepsis was more frequent in public institutions and this might have been associated with a higher mortality. Improving sepsis recognition and early diagnosis may be important targets in public institutions.Katia Aparecida Pessoa CondeEliezer SilvaCarla Oliveira SilvaElaine FerreiraFlavio Geraldo Rezende FreitasIsac CastroAlvaro Rea-NetoCintia Magalhaes Carvalho GrionAnselmo Dornas MouraSuzana Margareth LoboLuciano Cesar Pontes AzevedoFlavia Ribeiro MachadoPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 6, p e64790 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Katia Aparecida Pessoa Conde
Eliezer Silva
Carla Oliveira Silva
Elaine Ferreira
Flavio Geraldo Rezende Freitas
Isac Castro
Alvaro Rea-Neto
Cintia Magalhaes Carvalho Grion
Anselmo Dornas Moura
Suzana Margareth Lobo
Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo
Flavia Ribeiro Machado
Differences in sepsis treatment and outcomes between public and private hospitals in Brazil: a multicenter observational study.
description <h4>Background</h4>Previous studies showed higher sepsis mortality rates in Brazil compared to other developed or developing countries. Moreover, another trial demonstrated an increased mortality rate in public hospitals compared to private hospitals in Brazil. The reasons for these findings may include delayed recognition and inadequate treatment of sepsis in public facilities. We designed this study to evaluate the factors associated with mortality in septic patients admitted to intensive care units in a network of public and private institutions.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>This study is a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort of sepsis patients in 19 private and public institutions in Brazil. We analyzed data from the original database and collected additional data to assess compliance to the treatment guidelines and to determine the time from the onset of organ dysfunction and the sepsis diagnosis by the healthcare team.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 396 patients were analyzed. Patients in public hospitals were younger, had a greater number of dysfunctional organs at baseline and a lower chance to have sepsis diagnosed within two hours of the onset of organ dysfunction. Private hospitals had a better compliance to lactate and blood culture sampling and maintenance of glycemic control. The multivariate analysis showed that age, disease severity at baseline and being treated at a public hospital were independent risk factors for mortality. A delay in the sepsis diagnosis of longer than two hours was associated with mortality only in the public setting.<h4>Conclusions</h4>We confirmed a lower sepsis mortality rate in the private hospitals of this network. Being treated in a public hospital was an independent factor for mortality. Delayed recognition of sepsis was more frequent in public institutions and this might have been associated with a higher mortality. Improving sepsis recognition and early diagnosis may be important targets in public institutions.
format article
author Katia Aparecida Pessoa Conde
Eliezer Silva
Carla Oliveira Silva
Elaine Ferreira
Flavio Geraldo Rezende Freitas
Isac Castro
Alvaro Rea-Neto
Cintia Magalhaes Carvalho Grion
Anselmo Dornas Moura
Suzana Margareth Lobo
Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo
Flavia Ribeiro Machado
author_facet Katia Aparecida Pessoa Conde
Eliezer Silva
Carla Oliveira Silva
Elaine Ferreira
Flavio Geraldo Rezende Freitas
Isac Castro
Alvaro Rea-Neto
Cintia Magalhaes Carvalho Grion
Anselmo Dornas Moura
Suzana Margareth Lobo
Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo
Flavia Ribeiro Machado
author_sort Katia Aparecida Pessoa Conde
title Differences in sepsis treatment and outcomes between public and private hospitals in Brazil: a multicenter observational study.
title_short Differences in sepsis treatment and outcomes between public and private hospitals in Brazil: a multicenter observational study.
title_full Differences in sepsis treatment and outcomes between public and private hospitals in Brazil: a multicenter observational study.
title_fullStr Differences in sepsis treatment and outcomes between public and private hospitals in Brazil: a multicenter observational study.
title_full_unstemmed Differences in sepsis treatment and outcomes between public and private hospitals in Brazil: a multicenter observational study.
title_sort differences in sepsis treatment and outcomes between public and private hospitals in brazil: a multicenter observational study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/884f524e314b49e4bc03844aa33ac60c
work_keys_str_mv AT katiaaparecidapessoaconde differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT eliezersilva differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT carlaoliveirasilva differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT elaineferreira differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT flaviogeraldorezendefreitas differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT isaccastro differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT alvaroreaneto differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT cintiamagalhaescarvalhogrion differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT anselmodornasmoura differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT suzanamargarethlobo differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT lucianocesarpontesazevedo differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT flaviaribeiromachado differencesinsepsistreatmentandoutcomesbetweenpublicandprivatehospitalsinbrazilamulticenterobservationalstudy
_version_ 1718423047760773120