On the 2-Row Rule for Infectious Disease Transmission on Aircraft

<p>Background</p><p>With over two billion airline passengers annually, in-flight transmission of infectious diseases is an important global health concern. Many instances of in-flight transmission have been documented, but the relative influence of the many factors (see below) affe...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vicki Stover Hertzberg, Howard Weiss
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/88afa0abbbbf4c04a0792e2a042aac79
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:88afa0abbbbf4c04a0792e2a042aac79
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:88afa0abbbbf4c04a0792e2a042aac792021-12-02T11:19:32ZOn the 2-Row Rule for Infectious Disease Transmission on Aircraft2214-999610.1016/j.aogh.2016.06.003https://doaj.org/article/88afa0abbbbf4c04a0792e2a042aac792017-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/709https://doaj.org/toc/2214-9996<p>Background</p><p>With over two billion airline passengers annually, in-flight transmission of infectious diseases is an important global health concern. Many instances of in-flight transmission have been documented, but the relative influence of the many factors (see below) affecting in-flight transmission has not been quantified. Long-standing guidance by public health agencies is that the primary transmission risk associated with air travel for most respiratory infectious diseases is associated with sitting within two rows of an infectious passenger. The effect of proximity may be one of these factors.</p><p>Objective</p><p>The aim of this study was to determine the risk of infection within and beyond the 2-row rule given by public health guidance.</p><p>Methods</p><p>We searched the literature for reports of in-flight transmission of infection which included seat maps indicating where the infectious and infected passengers were seated.</p><p>Findings</p><p>There is a ∼ 6% risk to passengers seated within the 2-rows of infected individual(s) and there is ∼ 2% risk to passengers seated beyond 2-rows from the infectious individual.</p><p>Discussion</p><p>Contact tracing limited to passengers within 2-rows of the infectious individual(s) could fail to detect other cases of infections. This has important consequences for assessing the spread of infectious diseases.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Infection at a distance from the index case indicates other factors, such as airflow, movement of passenger/crew members, fomites and contacts between passengers in the departure gate before boarding, or after deplaning, are involved.Vicki Stover HertzbergHoward WeissUbiquity PressarticleAirplane cabininfectious disease transmissiondisease riskSARSinfluenzaInfectious and parasitic diseasesRC109-216Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENAnnals of Global Health, Vol 82, Iss 5, Pp 819-823 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Airplane cabin
infectious disease transmission
disease risk
SARS
influenza
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Airplane cabin
infectious disease transmission
disease risk
SARS
influenza
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Vicki Stover Hertzberg
Howard Weiss
On the 2-Row Rule for Infectious Disease Transmission on Aircraft
description <p>Background</p><p>With over two billion airline passengers annually, in-flight transmission of infectious diseases is an important global health concern. Many instances of in-flight transmission have been documented, but the relative influence of the many factors (see below) affecting in-flight transmission has not been quantified. Long-standing guidance by public health agencies is that the primary transmission risk associated with air travel for most respiratory infectious diseases is associated with sitting within two rows of an infectious passenger. The effect of proximity may be one of these factors.</p><p>Objective</p><p>The aim of this study was to determine the risk of infection within and beyond the 2-row rule given by public health guidance.</p><p>Methods</p><p>We searched the literature for reports of in-flight transmission of infection which included seat maps indicating where the infectious and infected passengers were seated.</p><p>Findings</p><p>There is a ∼ 6% risk to passengers seated within the 2-rows of infected individual(s) and there is ∼ 2% risk to passengers seated beyond 2-rows from the infectious individual.</p><p>Discussion</p><p>Contact tracing limited to passengers within 2-rows of the infectious individual(s) could fail to detect other cases of infections. This has important consequences for assessing the spread of infectious diseases.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Infection at a distance from the index case indicates other factors, such as airflow, movement of passenger/crew members, fomites and contacts between passengers in the departure gate before boarding, or after deplaning, are involved.
format article
author Vicki Stover Hertzberg
Howard Weiss
author_facet Vicki Stover Hertzberg
Howard Weiss
author_sort Vicki Stover Hertzberg
title On the 2-Row Rule for Infectious Disease Transmission on Aircraft
title_short On the 2-Row Rule for Infectious Disease Transmission on Aircraft
title_full On the 2-Row Rule for Infectious Disease Transmission on Aircraft
title_fullStr On the 2-Row Rule for Infectious Disease Transmission on Aircraft
title_full_unstemmed On the 2-Row Rule for Infectious Disease Transmission on Aircraft
title_sort on the 2-row rule for infectious disease transmission on aircraft
publisher Ubiquity Press
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/88afa0abbbbf4c04a0792e2a042aac79
work_keys_str_mv AT vickistoverhertzberg onthe2rowruleforinfectiousdiseasetransmissiononaircraft
AT howardweiss onthe2rowruleforinfectiousdiseasetransmissiononaircraft
_version_ 1718395996143091712