Implant survival of 662 dual-mobility cups and 727 constrained liners in primary THA: small femoral head size increases the cumulative incidence of revision

Background and purpose — In total hip arthroplasty (THA), the risk for dislocation can be reduced using either dual-mobility cups (DMCs) or constrained liners (CLs). There are few studies comparing these concepts in primary THA. Therefore, we compared the cumulative incidence of revision in primary...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oskari Pakarinen, Olli Lainiala, Aleksi Reito, Perttu Neuvonen, Keijo Mäkelä, Antti Eskelinen
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/88b495a9f19548f585dd5b8deecc6fae
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:88b495a9f19548f585dd5b8deecc6fae
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:88b495a9f19548f585dd5b8deecc6fae2021-11-26T11:19:47ZImplant survival of 662 dual-mobility cups and 727 constrained liners in primary THA: small femoral head size increases the cumulative incidence of revision1745-36741745-368210.1080/17453674.2021.1939597https://doaj.org/article/88b495a9f19548f585dd5b8deecc6fae2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2021.1939597https://doaj.org/toc/1745-3674https://doaj.org/toc/1745-3682Background and purpose — In total hip arthroplasty (THA), the risk for dislocation can be reduced using either dual-mobility cups (DMCs) or constrained liners (CLs). There are few studies comparing these concepts in primary THA. Therefore, we compared the cumulative incidence of revision in primary THA patients treated with DMC or CL with varying head sizes with conventional THA patients as reference group. Patients and methods — We performed a cohort study based on the Finnish arthroplasty register, comparing DMCs and CLs operated over the period 2000–2017. DMCs were divided into 2 groups based on the implant design: “DMC Trident” group (n = 399) and “DMC Others” group (n = 263). CLs were divided based on the femoral head size: “CL 36 mm” group (n = 425) and “CL < 36 mm” group (n = 302). All conventional primary THAs operated on in 2000–2017 with 28–36 mm femoral head were included as control group (“Conventional THA” group, n = 102,276). Implant survival was calculated by the corresponding cumulative incidence function with revision as the endpoint and death as competing event. Also, the prevalence of different reasons for revision was compared. Results — The 6-year cumulative incidence function estimates for the first revision were 6.9% (95% CI 4.0–9.7) for DMC Trident, 5.0% (CI 1.5–8.5) for DMC Others, 13% (CI 9.3–17) for CL < 36 mm, 6.3% (3.7–8.9) for CL 36 mm, and 4.7% (CI 4.5–4.8) for control group (conventional THA). The prevalence of dislocation revision was high (5.0%, CI 2.9–8.2) in the CL < 36 mm group compared with other groups. Interpretation — The DMC and CL 36 mm groups had promising mid-term survival rates, comparable to those of primary conventional THA group. The revision rate of CLs with < 36 mm head was high, mostly due to high prevalence of dislocation revisions. Therefore, CLs with 36 mm femoral head should be preferred over smaller ones.Oskari PakarinenOlli LainialaAleksi ReitoPerttu NeuvonenKeijo MäkeläAntti EskelinenTaylor & Francis GrouparticleOrthopedic surgeryRD701-811ENActa Orthopaedica, Vol 92, Iss 6, Pp 658-664 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Orthopedic surgery
RD701-811
spellingShingle Orthopedic surgery
RD701-811
Oskari Pakarinen
Olli Lainiala
Aleksi Reito
Perttu Neuvonen
Keijo Mäkelä
Antti Eskelinen
Implant survival of 662 dual-mobility cups and 727 constrained liners in primary THA: small femoral head size increases the cumulative incidence of revision
description Background and purpose — In total hip arthroplasty (THA), the risk for dislocation can be reduced using either dual-mobility cups (DMCs) or constrained liners (CLs). There are few studies comparing these concepts in primary THA. Therefore, we compared the cumulative incidence of revision in primary THA patients treated with DMC or CL with varying head sizes with conventional THA patients as reference group. Patients and methods — We performed a cohort study based on the Finnish arthroplasty register, comparing DMCs and CLs operated over the period 2000–2017. DMCs were divided into 2 groups based on the implant design: “DMC Trident” group (n = 399) and “DMC Others” group (n = 263). CLs were divided based on the femoral head size: “CL 36 mm” group (n = 425) and “CL < 36 mm” group (n = 302). All conventional primary THAs operated on in 2000–2017 with 28–36 mm femoral head were included as control group (“Conventional THA” group, n = 102,276). Implant survival was calculated by the corresponding cumulative incidence function with revision as the endpoint and death as competing event. Also, the prevalence of different reasons for revision was compared. Results — The 6-year cumulative incidence function estimates for the first revision were 6.9% (95% CI 4.0–9.7) for DMC Trident, 5.0% (CI 1.5–8.5) for DMC Others, 13% (CI 9.3–17) for CL < 36 mm, 6.3% (3.7–8.9) for CL 36 mm, and 4.7% (CI 4.5–4.8) for control group (conventional THA). The prevalence of dislocation revision was high (5.0%, CI 2.9–8.2) in the CL < 36 mm group compared with other groups. Interpretation — The DMC and CL 36 mm groups had promising mid-term survival rates, comparable to those of primary conventional THA group. The revision rate of CLs with < 36 mm head was high, mostly due to high prevalence of dislocation revisions. Therefore, CLs with 36 mm femoral head should be preferred over smaller ones.
format article
author Oskari Pakarinen
Olli Lainiala
Aleksi Reito
Perttu Neuvonen
Keijo Mäkelä
Antti Eskelinen
author_facet Oskari Pakarinen
Olli Lainiala
Aleksi Reito
Perttu Neuvonen
Keijo Mäkelä
Antti Eskelinen
author_sort Oskari Pakarinen
title Implant survival of 662 dual-mobility cups and 727 constrained liners in primary THA: small femoral head size increases the cumulative incidence of revision
title_short Implant survival of 662 dual-mobility cups and 727 constrained liners in primary THA: small femoral head size increases the cumulative incidence of revision
title_full Implant survival of 662 dual-mobility cups and 727 constrained liners in primary THA: small femoral head size increases the cumulative incidence of revision
title_fullStr Implant survival of 662 dual-mobility cups and 727 constrained liners in primary THA: small femoral head size increases the cumulative incidence of revision
title_full_unstemmed Implant survival of 662 dual-mobility cups and 727 constrained liners in primary THA: small femoral head size increases the cumulative incidence of revision
title_sort implant survival of 662 dual-mobility cups and 727 constrained liners in primary tha: small femoral head size increases the cumulative incidence of revision
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/88b495a9f19548f585dd5b8deecc6fae
work_keys_str_mv AT oskaripakarinen implantsurvivalof662dualmobilitycupsand727constrainedlinersinprimarythasmallfemoralheadsizeincreasesthecumulativeincidenceofrevision
AT ollilainiala implantsurvivalof662dualmobilitycupsand727constrainedlinersinprimarythasmallfemoralheadsizeincreasesthecumulativeincidenceofrevision
AT aleksireito implantsurvivalof662dualmobilitycupsand727constrainedlinersinprimarythasmallfemoralheadsizeincreasesthecumulativeincidenceofrevision
AT perttuneuvonen implantsurvivalof662dualmobilitycupsand727constrainedlinersinprimarythasmallfemoralheadsizeincreasesthecumulativeincidenceofrevision
AT keijomakela implantsurvivalof662dualmobilitycupsand727constrainedlinersinprimarythasmallfemoralheadsizeincreasesthecumulativeincidenceofrevision
AT anttieskelinen implantsurvivalof662dualmobilitycupsand727constrainedlinersinprimarythasmallfemoralheadsizeincreasesthecumulativeincidenceofrevision
_version_ 1718409546282565632