Incorrect interpretation of carbon mass balance biases global vegetation fire emission estimates

Vegetation fires contribute to global carbon emissions, but uncertainty exists due to inconsistencies in the treatment of post-burn combustion. Here, it is shown that the ‘consumed biomass’ approach overestimates emissions by 4%, which can be corrected using an alternative ‘burnt carbon’ method....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	N. C. Surawski, A. L. Sullivan, S. H. Roxburgh, C.P. Mick Meyer, P. J. Polglase
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2016
Materias:	Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/890ab154fa4f45ca8f016bad06c6b3a9
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:890ab154fa4f45ca8f016bad06c6b3a9
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:890ab154fa4f45ca8f016bad06c6b3a92021-12-02T15:34:32ZIncorrect interpretation of carbon mass balance biases global vegetation fire emission estimates10.1038/ncomms115362041-1723https://doaj.org/article/890ab154fa4f45ca8f016bad06c6b3a92016-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11536https://doaj.org/toc/2041-1723Vegetation fires contribute to global carbon emissions, but uncertainty exists due to inconsistencies in the treatment of post-burn combustion. Here, it is shown that the ‘consumed biomass’ approach overestimates emissions by 4%, which can be corrected using an alternative ‘burnt carbon’ method.N. C. SurawskiA. L. SullivanS. H. RoxburghC.P. Mick MeyerP. J. PolglaseNature PortfolioarticleScienceQENNature Communications, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-5 (2016)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Science Q
spellingShingle	Science Q N. C. Surawski A. L. Sullivan S. H. Roxburgh C.P. Mick Meyer P. J. Polglase Incorrect interpretation of carbon mass balance biases global vegetation fire emission estimates
description	Vegetation fires contribute to global carbon emissions, but uncertainty exists due to inconsistencies in the treatment of post-burn combustion. Here, it is shown that the ‘consumed biomass’ approach overestimates emissions by 4%, which can be corrected using an alternative ‘burnt carbon’ method.
format	article
author	N. C. Surawski A. L. Sullivan S. H. Roxburgh C.P. Mick Meyer P. J. Polglase
author_facet	N. C. Surawski A. L. Sullivan S. H. Roxburgh C.P. Mick Meyer P. J. Polglase
author_sort	N. C. Surawski
title	Incorrect interpretation of carbon mass balance biases global vegetation fire emission estimates
title_short	Incorrect interpretation of carbon mass balance biases global vegetation fire emission estimates
title_full	Incorrect interpretation of carbon mass balance biases global vegetation fire emission estimates
title_fullStr	Incorrect interpretation of carbon mass balance biases global vegetation fire emission estimates
title_full_unstemmed	Incorrect interpretation of carbon mass balance biases global vegetation fire emission estimates
title_sort	incorrect interpretation of carbon mass balance biases global vegetation fire emission estimates
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2016
url	https://doaj.org/article/890ab154fa4f45ca8f016bad06c6b3a9
work_keys_str_mv	AT ncsurawski incorrectinterpretationofcarbonmassbalancebiasesglobalvegetationfireemissionestimates AT alsullivan incorrectinterpretationofcarbonmassbalancebiasesglobalvegetationfireemissionestimates AT shroxburgh incorrectinterpretationofcarbonmassbalancebiasesglobalvegetationfireemissionestimates AT cpmickmeyer incorrectinterpretationofcarbonmassbalancebiasesglobalvegetationfireemissionestimates AT pjpolglase incorrectinterpretationofcarbonmassbalancebiasesglobalvegetationfireemissionestimates
_version_	1718386790819168256

Incorrect interpretation of carbon mass balance biases global vegetation fire emission estimates

Ejemplares similares