Textile-Reinforced Concrete Versus Steel-Reinforced Concrete in Flexural Performance of Full-Scale Concrete Beams

The effectiveness of textile-reinforced concrete (TRC) and steel-reinforced concrete (SRC) in the flexural performance of rectangular concrete beams was investigated in this study. To better understand TRC behaviour, large-scale concrete beams of 120 × 200 × 2600 mm were tested and analysed in this...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Fahed Alrshoudi
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	textile-reinforced concrete textile fibres steel-reinforced concrete large-scale beam flexural performance Crystallography QD901-999
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/8956285cdbc14b9ab2c079c8801ffb77
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:8956285cdbc14b9ab2c079c8801ffb77
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:8956285cdbc14b9ab2c079c8801ffb772021-11-25T17:17:33ZTextile-Reinforced Concrete Versus Steel-Reinforced Concrete in Flexural Performance of Full-Scale Concrete Beams10.3390/cryst111112722073-4352https://doaj.org/article/8956285cdbc14b9ab2c079c8801ffb772021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/11/11/1272https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4352The effectiveness of textile-reinforced concrete (TRC) and steel-reinforced concrete (SRC) in the flexural performance of rectangular concrete beams was investigated in this study. To better understand TRC behaviour, large-scale concrete beams of 120 × 200 × 2600 mm were tested and analysed in this work. Cover thickness, anchoring, and various layouts were all taken into consideration to assess the performance of beams. In addition, bi-axial and uni-axial TRC beams and SRC beams were classified according to the sort and arrangement of reinforcements. The findings showed that anchoring the textiles at both ends enhanced load resistance and prevented sliding. The ultimate load of the tow type of textile reinforcement was higher, attributed to the increased bond. Variations in cover thickness also change the ultimate load and deflection, according to the findings. Consequently, in this investigation, the ideal cover thickness was determined to be 30 mm. Furthermore, for the similar area of reinforcements, the ultimate load of TRC beams was noted up to 56% higher than that of the SRC control beam, while the deflection was roughly 37% lower.Fahed AlrshoudiMDPI AGarticletextile-reinforced concretetextile fibressteel-reinforced concretelarge-scale beamflexural performanceCrystallographyQD901-999ENCrystals, Vol 11, Iss 1272, p 1272 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	textile-reinforced concrete textile fibres steel-reinforced concrete large-scale beam flexural performance Crystallography QD901-999
spellingShingle	textile-reinforced concrete textile fibres steel-reinforced concrete large-scale beam flexural performance Crystallography QD901-999 Fahed Alrshoudi Textile-Reinforced Concrete Versus Steel-Reinforced Concrete in Flexural Performance of Full-Scale Concrete Beams
description	The effectiveness of textile-reinforced concrete (TRC) and steel-reinforced concrete (SRC) in the flexural performance of rectangular concrete beams was investigated in this study. To better understand TRC behaviour, large-scale concrete beams of 120 × 200 × 2600 mm were tested and analysed in this work. Cover thickness, anchoring, and various layouts were all taken into consideration to assess the performance of beams. In addition, bi-axial and uni-axial TRC beams and SRC beams were classified according to the sort and arrangement of reinforcements. The findings showed that anchoring the textiles at both ends enhanced load resistance and prevented sliding. The ultimate load of the tow type of textile reinforcement was higher, attributed to the increased bond. Variations in cover thickness also change the ultimate load and deflection, according to the findings. Consequently, in this investigation, the ideal cover thickness was determined to be 30 mm. Furthermore, for the similar area of reinforcements, the ultimate load of TRC beams was noted up to 56% higher than that of the SRC control beam, while the deflection was roughly 37% lower.
format	article
author	Fahed Alrshoudi
author_facet	Fahed Alrshoudi
author_sort	Fahed Alrshoudi
title	Textile-Reinforced Concrete Versus Steel-Reinforced Concrete in Flexural Performance of Full-Scale Concrete Beams
title_short	Textile-Reinforced Concrete Versus Steel-Reinforced Concrete in Flexural Performance of Full-Scale Concrete Beams
title_full	Textile-Reinforced Concrete Versus Steel-Reinforced Concrete in Flexural Performance of Full-Scale Concrete Beams
title_fullStr	Textile-Reinforced Concrete Versus Steel-Reinforced Concrete in Flexural Performance of Full-Scale Concrete Beams
title_full_unstemmed	Textile-Reinforced Concrete Versus Steel-Reinforced Concrete in Flexural Performance of Full-Scale Concrete Beams
title_sort	textile-reinforced concrete versus steel-reinforced concrete in flexural performance of full-scale concrete beams
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/8956285cdbc14b9ab2c079c8801ffb77
work_keys_str_mv	AT fahedalrshoudi textilereinforcedconcreteversussteelreinforcedconcreteinflexuralperformanceoffullscaleconcretebeams
_version_	1718412542689148928

Textile-Reinforced Concrete Versus Steel-Reinforced Concrete in Flexural Performance of Full-Scale Concrete Beams

Ejemplares similares