Thin-walled compressed steel constructions under fire load

The article demonstrates the both theoretical and actual fire resistance limits of the composite I-shaped and box-shaped thin-walled steel structures in compression conditions under the standard fire load. The calculation was based on the Eurocode 3 and finite element modeling of high-temperature fi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gravit Marina, Dmitriev Ivan
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/895d4bd4e96a4ec590b8a24502c7d7f9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:895d4bd4e96a4ec590b8a24502c7d7f9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:895d4bd4e96a4ec590b8a24502c7d7f92021-11-12T15:54:05ZThin-walled compressed steel constructions under fire load2712-817210.34910/MCE.105.14https://doaj.org/article/895d4bd4e96a4ec590b8a24502c7d7f92021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://engstroy.spbstu.ru/article/2021.105.14/https://doaj.org/toc/2712-8172The article demonstrates the both theoretical and actual fire resistance limits of the composite I-shaped and box-shaped thin-walled steel structures in compression conditions under the standard fire load. The calculation was based on the Eurocode 3 and finite element modeling of high-temperature fields in SOFiSTiK PC. The experimental tests were carried out on the basis of design data to validate the results of both the calculation and modeling. It is shown that the static part of the calculation of the critical temperature, upon irreversible plastic deformations occur, is solved not completely correctly by means of regulations. In average the calculated critical temperature exceeds the actual one on 50-80°C. It is shown that the assumption of a critical temperature equals to 350 °C is unreasonably low. The complex graphs of the temperature growth for each steel construction are given according to the paragraphs of normative documents, the finite-element modeling and results of thermocouple indicators for the fire tests. The solution of thermophysical part of calculation according to Eurocode 3 showed good convergence with the results of the experimental data, including the samples with effective fire protection, but strongly depend on the step of calculation. The accurate results were reached only when the time step equals 1 sec. The finite element modeling predicted the correct time to achieve the critical temperature of the tested sample without any additional assumptions. The MBOR-16F material produced by TIZOL JSC was used as a flame protection. This is new material, which has not been previously studied yet. The recommendations on application of the finite element programs are given in the thermophysical part of the fire resistance calculation.Gravit MarinaDmitriev IvanPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic Universityarticlesteel constructionthin walled structurescold-formed steelstructural designfirefire safetyfire protectionfire designEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040ENMagazine of Civil Engineering, Vol None, Iss 05 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic steel construction
thin walled structures
cold-formed steel
structural design
fire
fire safety
fire protection
fire design
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
spellingShingle steel construction
thin walled structures
cold-formed steel
structural design
fire
fire safety
fire protection
fire design
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Gravit Marina
Dmitriev Ivan
Thin-walled compressed steel constructions under fire load
description The article demonstrates the both theoretical and actual fire resistance limits of the composite I-shaped and box-shaped thin-walled steel structures in compression conditions under the standard fire load. The calculation was based on the Eurocode 3 and finite element modeling of high-temperature fields in SOFiSTiK PC. The experimental tests were carried out on the basis of design data to validate the results of both the calculation and modeling. It is shown that the static part of the calculation of the critical temperature, upon irreversible plastic deformations occur, is solved not completely correctly by means of regulations. In average the calculated critical temperature exceeds the actual one on 50-80°C. It is shown that the assumption of a critical temperature equals to 350 °C is unreasonably low. The complex graphs of the temperature growth for each steel construction are given according to the paragraphs of normative documents, the finite-element modeling and results of thermocouple indicators for the fire tests. The solution of thermophysical part of calculation according to Eurocode 3 showed good convergence with the results of the experimental data, including the samples with effective fire protection, but strongly depend on the step of calculation. The accurate results were reached only when the time step equals 1 sec. The finite element modeling predicted the correct time to achieve the critical temperature of the tested sample without any additional assumptions. The MBOR-16F material produced by TIZOL JSC was used as a flame protection. This is new material, which has not been previously studied yet. The recommendations on application of the finite element programs are given in the thermophysical part of the fire resistance calculation.
format article
author Gravit Marina
Dmitriev Ivan
author_facet Gravit Marina
Dmitriev Ivan
author_sort Gravit Marina
title Thin-walled compressed steel constructions under fire load
title_short Thin-walled compressed steel constructions under fire load
title_full Thin-walled compressed steel constructions under fire load
title_fullStr Thin-walled compressed steel constructions under fire load
title_full_unstemmed Thin-walled compressed steel constructions under fire load
title_sort thin-walled compressed steel constructions under fire load
publisher Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/895d4bd4e96a4ec590b8a24502c7d7f9
work_keys_str_mv AT gravitmarina thinwalledcompressedsteelconstructionsunderfireload
AT dmitrievivan thinwalledcompressedsteelconstructionsunderfireload
_version_ 1718430379741806592