The comparisons of inhibitory control and post-error behaviors between different types of athletes and physically inactive adults.

To properly behave and correct mistakes, individuals must inhibit inappropriate actions and detect errors for future behavioral adjustment. Increasing evidence has demonstrated that athletes are superior in cognitive functions and this benefit varied dependent on the types of sport that individuals...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Chia-Chuan Yu, Neil G Muggleton, Chiao-Yun Chen, Cheng-Hung Ko, Suyen Liu
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/896ad67f360749cda7620a3a62eaa035
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:896ad67f360749cda7620a3a62eaa035
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:896ad67f360749cda7620a3a62eaa0352021-12-02T20:18:03ZThe comparisons of inhibitory control and post-error behaviors between different types of athletes and physically inactive adults.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0256272https://doaj.org/article/896ad67f360749cda7620a3a62eaa0352021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256272https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203To properly behave and correct mistakes, individuals must inhibit inappropriate actions and detect errors for future behavioral adjustment. Increasing evidence has demonstrated that athletes are superior in cognitive functions and this benefit varied dependent on the types of sport that individuals involved in, but less is known on whether athletes have a different error-related behavioral pattern. The purpose of this study was to compare the behavioral performance of inhibition and error monitoring between individuals who participated in an open-skill sport (n = 12), a closed-skill sport (n = 12), and a sedentary lifestyle (n = 16). A combined flanker/stop signal task was presented and the derived stop signal reaction time (SSRT), post-correct accuracy and reaction time (RT), as well as post-error accuracy and RT were compared across groups. Our findings indicated there was no difference in SSRT between groups. Surprisingly, significant post-error slowing (PES) was observed only in controls but not in sport groups, the controls also exhibited significantly longer post-error RT compared with the open-skill group. However, there was no difference in the post-error accuracy between groups, indicating a higher efficiency in the post-error processing among open- and closed-skill groups by requiring comparatively less time for behavioral adjustments. The present study is the first to disclose the discrepancies in PES between different types of athletes and controls. The findings suggest that sport training along with higher amounts of physical activity is associated with a more efficient behavioral pattern for error processing especially when the sport requires open skills in nature.Chia-Chuan YuNeil G MuggletonChiao-Yun ChenCheng-Hung KoSuyen LiuPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 8, p e0256272 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Chia-Chuan Yu Neil G Muggleton Chiao-Yun Chen Cheng-Hung Ko Suyen Liu The comparisons of inhibitory control and post-error behaviors between different types of athletes and physically inactive adults.
description	To properly behave and correct mistakes, individuals must inhibit inappropriate actions and detect errors for future behavioral adjustment. Increasing evidence has demonstrated that athletes are superior in cognitive functions and this benefit varied dependent on the types of sport that individuals involved in, but less is known on whether athletes have a different error-related behavioral pattern. The purpose of this study was to compare the behavioral performance of inhibition and error monitoring between individuals who participated in an open-skill sport (n = 12), a closed-skill sport (n = 12), and a sedentary lifestyle (n = 16). A combined flanker/stop signal task was presented and the derived stop signal reaction time (SSRT), post-correct accuracy and reaction time (RT), as well as post-error accuracy and RT were compared across groups. Our findings indicated there was no difference in SSRT between groups. Surprisingly, significant post-error slowing (PES) was observed only in controls but not in sport groups, the controls also exhibited significantly longer post-error RT compared with the open-skill group. However, there was no difference in the post-error accuracy between groups, indicating a higher efficiency in the post-error processing among open- and closed-skill groups by requiring comparatively less time for behavioral adjustments. The present study is the first to disclose the discrepancies in PES between different types of athletes and controls. The findings suggest that sport training along with higher amounts of physical activity is associated with a more efficient behavioral pattern for error processing especially when the sport requires open skills in nature.
format	article
author	Chia-Chuan Yu Neil G Muggleton Chiao-Yun Chen Cheng-Hung Ko Suyen Liu
author_facet	Chia-Chuan Yu Neil G Muggleton Chiao-Yun Chen Cheng-Hung Ko Suyen Liu
author_sort	Chia-Chuan Yu
title	The comparisons of inhibitory control and post-error behaviors between different types of athletes and physically inactive adults.
title_short	The comparisons of inhibitory control and post-error behaviors between different types of athletes and physically inactive adults.
title_full	The comparisons of inhibitory control and post-error behaviors between different types of athletes and physically inactive adults.
title_fullStr	The comparisons of inhibitory control and post-error behaviors between different types of athletes and physically inactive adults.
title_full_unstemmed	The comparisons of inhibitory control and post-error behaviors between different types of athletes and physically inactive adults.
title_sort	comparisons of inhibitory control and post-error behaviors between different types of athletes and physically inactive adults.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/896ad67f360749cda7620a3a62eaa035
work_keys_str_mv	AT chiachuanyu thecomparisonsofinhibitorycontrolandposterrorbehaviorsbetweendifferenttypesofathletesandphysicallyinactiveadults AT neilgmuggleton thecomparisonsofinhibitorycontrolandposterrorbehaviorsbetweendifferenttypesofathletesandphysicallyinactiveadults AT chiaoyunchen thecomparisonsofinhibitorycontrolandposterrorbehaviorsbetweendifferenttypesofathletesandphysicallyinactiveadults AT chenghungko thecomparisonsofinhibitorycontrolandposterrorbehaviorsbetweendifferenttypesofathletesandphysicallyinactiveadults AT suyenliu thecomparisonsofinhibitorycontrolandposterrorbehaviorsbetweendifferenttypesofathletesandphysicallyinactiveadults AT chiachuanyu comparisonsofinhibitorycontrolandposterrorbehaviorsbetweendifferenttypesofathletesandphysicallyinactiveadults AT neilgmuggleton comparisonsofinhibitorycontrolandposterrorbehaviorsbetweendifferenttypesofathletesandphysicallyinactiveadults AT chiaoyunchen comparisonsofinhibitorycontrolandposterrorbehaviorsbetweendifferenttypesofathletesandphysicallyinactiveadults AT chenghungko comparisonsofinhibitorycontrolandposterrorbehaviorsbetweendifferenttypesofathletesandphysicallyinactiveadults AT suyenliu comparisonsofinhibitorycontrolandposterrorbehaviorsbetweendifferenttypesofathletesandphysicallyinactiveadults
_version_	1718374355353731072

The comparisons of inhibitory control and post-error behaviors between different types of athletes and physically inactive adults.

Ejemplares similares