Preferences in Farmland Eco-Compensation Methods: A Case Study of Wuhan, China

Successful farmland eco-compensation projects need to reflect the heterogeneous preferences both from suppliers and beneficiaries. This paper tries to answer this question by investigating both citizen and farmer preferences for different farmland eco-compensation methods in Wuhan, China, and explor...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Xin Yang, Xiaohe Zhou, Shuwen Cao, Anlu Zhang
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	heterogeneous preference multinomial logit model citizens and farmers socio-demographic characteristics Agriculture S
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/899202c3495242f79f3d031e659abcad
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:899202c3495242f79f3d031e659abcad
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:899202c3495242f79f3d031e659abcad2021-11-25T18:09:21ZPreferences in Farmland Eco-Compensation Methods: A Case Study of Wuhan, China10.3390/land101111592073-445Xhttps://doaj.org/article/899202c3495242f79f3d031e659abcad2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1159https://doaj.org/toc/2073-445XSuccessful farmland eco-compensation projects need to reflect the heterogeneous preferences both from suppliers and beneficiaries. This paper tries to answer this question by investigating both citizen and farmer preferences for different farmland eco-compensation methods in Wuhan, China, and explore some of the socio-demographic characteristics that contribute to their preferences. Based on the data of 288 citizens and 331 farmers, the multinomial logit model was employed to analyze their preferences for the four farmland eco-compensation methods (monetary compensation, in-kind compensation, technology compensation and policy compensation), respectively. The results show that: (1) Monetary compensation is the most welcomed farmland eco-compensation method among both citizens and farmers. (2) Despite farmers and citizens both putting a high value on monetary compensation methods, citizens are more likely to provide compensation methods that can help farmers improve their living standards in a sustainable method (in-kind compensation, technology compensation and policy compensation). Farmers are less likely to choose the in-kind compensation method. (3) The preference for farmland eco-compensation systems of farmers and citizens are influenced by different socio-demographic characteristics. The results can help the government to design more aimed farmland eco-compensation methods for farmers with different socio-demographic characteristics.Xin YangXiaohe ZhouShuwen CaoAnlu ZhangMDPI AGarticleheterogeneous preferencemultinomial logit modelcitizens and farmerssocio-demographic characteristicsAgricultureSENLand, Vol 10, Iss 1159, p 1159 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	heterogeneous preference multinomial logit model citizens and farmers socio-demographic characteristics Agriculture S
spellingShingle	heterogeneous preference multinomial logit model citizens and farmers socio-demographic characteristics Agriculture S Xin Yang Xiaohe Zhou Shuwen Cao Anlu Zhang Preferences in Farmland Eco-Compensation Methods: A Case Study of Wuhan, China
description	Successful farmland eco-compensation projects need to reflect the heterogeneous preferences both from suppliers and beneficiaries. This paper tries to answer this question by investigating both citizen and farmer preferences for different farmland eco-compensation methods in Wuhan, China, and explore some of the socio-demographic characteristics that contribute to their preferences. Based on the data of 288 citizens and 331 farmers, the multinomial logit model was employed to analyze their preferences for the four farmland eco-compensation methods (monetary compensation, in-kind compensation, technology compensation and policy compensation), respectively. The results show that: (1) Monetary compensation is the most welcomed farmland eco-compensation method among both citizens and farmers. (2) Despite farmers and citizens both putting a high value on monetary compensation methods, citizens are more likely to provide compensation methods that can help farmers improve their living standards in a sustainable method (in-kind compensation, technology compensation and policy compensation). Farmers are less likely to choose the in-kind compensation method. (3) The preference for farmland eco-compensation systems of farmers and citizens are influenced by different socio-demographic characteristics. The results can help the government to design more aimed farmland eco-compensation methods for farmers with different socio-demographic characteristics.
format	article
author	Xin Yang Xiaohe Zhou Shuwen Cao Anlu Zhang
author_facet	Xin Yang Xiaohe Zhou Shuwen Cao Anlu Zhang
author_sort	Xin Yang
title	Preferences in Farmland Eco-Compensation Methods: A Case Study of Wuhan, China
title_short	Preferences in Farmland Eco-Compensation Methods: A Case Study of Wuhan, China
title_full	Preferences in Farmland Eco-Compensation Methods: A Case Study of Wuhan, China
title_fullStr	Preferences in Farmland Eco-Compensation Methods: A Case Study of Wuhan, China
title_full_unstemmed	Preferences in Farmland Eco-Compensation Methods: A Case Study of Wuhan, China
title_sort	preferences in farmland eco-compensation methods: a case study of wuhan, china
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/899202c3495242f79f3d031e659abcad
work_keys_str_mv	AT xinyang preferencesinfarmlandecocompensationmethodsacasestudyofwuhanchina AT xiaohezhou preferencesinfarmlandecocompensationmethodsacasestudyofwuhanchina AT shuwencao preferencesinfarmlandecocompensationmethodsacasestudyofwuhanchina AT anluzhang preferencesinfarmlandecocompensationmethodsacasestudyofwuhanchina
_version_	1718411570864717824

Preferences in Farmland Eco-Compensation Methods: A Case Study of Wuhan, China

Ejemplares similares