Analysis of Ionospheric and Geomagnetic Response to the 2020 Patagonian Solar Eclipse

Total solar eclipses are unique opportunities to study how the ionospheric and external geomagnetic field responds to fast changes in the ionizing flux as the moon’s shadow travels through its path over the ionosphere at an average speed of 3,000 km/h. In this contribution, we describe our observing...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amalia Meza, Bernardo Eylenstein, María Paula Natali, Guillermo Bosch, Juan Moirano, Elfriede Chalar
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8a3f02b03c3a484aa7252539365f8b65
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8a3f02b03c3a484aa7252539365f8b65
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8a3f02b03c3a484aa7252539365f8b652021-12-03T07:01:22ZAnalysis of Ionospheric and Geomagnetic Response to the 2020 Patagonian Solar Eclipse2296-987X10.3389/fspas.2021.766327https://doaj.org/article/8a3f02b03c3a484aa7252539365f8b652021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspas.2021.766327/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2296-987XTotal solar eclipses are unique opportunities to study how the ionospheric and external geomagnetic field responds to fast changes in the ionizing flux as the moon’s shadow travels through its path over the ionosphere at an average speed of 3,000 km/h. In this contribution, we describe our observing campaign in which we set up GNSS and geomagnetic stations at the city of Valcheta, Río Negro, Argentina (which was located right under the path of totality). We also describe the results obtained from the analysis of the combination of on-site data together with publicly available observations from geodetic and geomagnetic observatories. The large span in latitude of our data allowed us to analyze the different magnitudes of the drop in vertical total electron content (ΔVTEC) with varying occultation percentages. We found an expected reduction in this drop as we move away from totality path but we also detected a new increment in ΔVTEC as we got closer to Earth’s Magnetic Equator. We also compared our observations of the geomagnetic field variations with predictions that were based on the Ashour-Chapman model and we find an overall good agreement, although a ≈20 min delay with the eclipse maximum is evident beyond observing uncertainties. This suggests the presence of processes that delay the response of the lower ionosphere to the loss of the photoionization flux.Amalia MezaAmalia MezaBernardo EylensteinBernardo EylensteinMaría Paula NataliMaría Paula NataliGuillermo BoschJuan MoiranoElfriede ChalarFrontiers Media S.A.articlesolar eclipsesearth ionosphereF-layerE-layergeomagnetic fieldsAstronomyQB1-991Geophysics. Cosmic physicsQC801-809ENFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, Vol 8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic solar eclipses
earth ionosphere
F-layer
E-layer
geomagnetic fields
Astronomy
QB1-991
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
spellingShingle solar eclipses
earth ionosphere
F-layer
E-layer
geomagnetic fields
Astronomy
QB1-991
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
Amalia Meza
Amalia Meza
Bernardo Eylenstein
Bernardo Eylenstein
María Paula Natali
María Paula Natali
Guillermo Bosch
Juan Moirano
Elfriede Chalar
Analysis of Ionospheric and Geomagnetic Response to the 2020 Patagonian Solar Eclipse
description Total solar eclipses are unique opportunities to study how the ionospheric and external geomagnetic field responds to fast changes in the ionizing flux as the moon’s shadow travels through its path over the ionosphere at an average speed of 3,000 km/h. In this contribution, we describe our observing campaign in which we set up GNSS and geomagnetic stations at the city of Valcheta, Río Negro, Argentina (which was located right under the path of totality). We also describe the results obtained from the analysis of the combination of on-site data together with publicly available observations from geodetic and geomagnetic observatories. The large span in latitude of our data allowed us to analyze the different magnitudes of the drop in vertical total electron content (ΔVTEC) with varying occultation percentages. We found an expected reduction in this drop as we move away from totality path but we also detected a new increment in ΔVTEC as we got closer to Earth’s Magnetic Equator. We also compared our observations of the geomagnetic field variations with predictions that were based on the Ashour-Chapman model and we find an overall good agreement, although a ≈20 min delay with the eclipse maximum is evident beyond observing uncertainties. This suggests the presence of processes that delay the response of the lower ionosphere to the loss of the photoionization flux.
format article
author Amalia Meza
Amalia Meza
Bernardo Eylenstein
Bernardo Eylenstein
María Paula Natali
María Paula Natali
Guillermo Bosch
Juan Moirano
Elfriede Chalar
author_facet Amalia Meza
Amalia Meza
Bernardo Eylenstein
Bernardo Eylenstein
María Paula Natali
María Paula Natali
Guillermo Bosch
Juan Moirano
Elfriede Chalar
author_sort Amalia Meza
title Analysis of Ionospheric and Geomagnetic Response to the 2020 Patagonian Solar Eclipse
title_short Analysis of Ionospheric and Geomagnetic Response to the 2020 Patagonian Solar Eclipse
title_full Analysis of Ionospheric and Geomagnetic Response to the 2020 Patagonian Solar Eclipse
title_fullStr Analysis of Ionospheric and Geomagnetic Response to the 2020 Patagonian Solar Eclipse
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Ionospheric and Geomagnetic Response to the 2020 Patagonian Solar Eclipse
title_sort analysis of ionospheric and geomagnetic response to the 2020 patagonian solar eclipse
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8a3f02b03c3a484aa7252539365f8b65
work_keys_str_mv AT amaliameza analysisofionosphericandgeomagneticresponsetothe2020patagoniansolareclipse
AT amaliameza analysisofionosphericandgeomagneticresponsetothe2020patagoniansolareclipse
AT bernardoeylenstein analysisofionosphericandgeomagneticresponsetothe2020patagoniansolareclipse
AT bernardoeylenstein analysisofionosphericandgeomagneticresponsetothe2020patagoniansolareclipse
AT mariapaulanatali analysisofionosphericandgeomagneticresponsetothe2020patagoniansolareclipse
AT mariapaulanatali analysisofionosphericandgeomagneticresponsetothe2020patagoniansolareclipse
AT guillermobosch analysisofionosphericandgeomagneticresponsetothe2020patagoniansolareclipse
AT juanmoirano analysisofionosphericandgeomagneticresponsetothe2020patagoniansolareclipse
AT elfriedechalar analysisofionosphericandgeomagneticresponsetothe2020patagoniansolareclipse
_version_ 1718373884088025088