Improving Institutional Repositories through User-Centered Design: Indicators from a Focus Group

User experience with intuitive and flexible digital platforms can be enjoyable and satisfying. A strategy to deliver such an experience is to place the users at the center of the design process and analyze their beliefs and perceptions to add appropriate platform features. This study conducted with...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laura Icela González-Pérez, María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya, Francisco José García-Peñalvo
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8a5203f6438f456d98fc0b8c5b439fe2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8a5203f6438f456d98fc0b8c5b439fe2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8a5203f6438f456d98fc0b8c5b439fe22021-11-25T17:39:49ZImproving Institutional Repositories through User-Centered Design: Indicators from a Focus Group10.3390/fi131102821999-5903https://doaj.org/article/8a5203f6438f456d98fc0b8c5b439fe22021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/13/11/282https://doaj.org/toc/1999-5903User experience with intuitive and flexible digital platforms can be enjoyable and satisfying. A strategy to deliver such an experience is to place the users at the center of the design process and analyze their beliefs and perceptions to add appropriate platform features. This study conducted with focus groups as a qualitative method of data collection to investigate users’ preferences and develop a new landing page for institutional repositories with attractive functionalities based on their information-structural rules. The research question was: What are the motivations and experiences of users in an academic community when publishing scientific information in an institutional repository? The focus group technique used in this study had three sessions. Results showed that 50% of the participants did not know the functionalities of the institutional repository nor its benefits. Users’ perceptions of platforms such as ResearchGate or Google Scholar that provide academic production were also identified. The findings showed that motivating an academic community to use an institutional repository requires technological functions, user guidelines that identify what can or cannot be published in open access, and training programs for open access publication practices and institutional repository use. These measures align with global strategies to strengthen the digital identities of scientific communities and thus benefit open science.Laura Icela González-PérezMaría Soledad Ramírez-MontoyaFrancisco José García-PeñalvoMDPI AGarticleuser experienceinstitutional repositoriesfocus groupdigital identityhigher educationeducational innovationInformation technologyT58.5-58.64ENFuture Internet, Vol 13, Iss 282, p 282 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic user experience
institutional repositories
focus group
digital identity
higher education
educational innovation
Information technology
T58.5-58.64
spellingShingle user experience
institutional repositories
focus group
digital identity
higher education
educational innovation
Information technology
T58.5-58.64
Laura Icela González-Pérez
María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya
Francisco José García-Peñalvo
Improving Institutional Repositories through User-Centered Design: Indicators from a Focus Group
description User experience with intuitive and flexible digital platforms can be enjoyable and satisfying. A strategy to deliver such an experience is to place the users at the center of the design process and analyze their beliefs and perceptions to add appropriate platform features. This study conducted with focus groups as a qualitative method of data collection to investigate users’ preferences and develop a new landing page for institutional repositories with attractive functionalities based on their information-structural rules. The research question was: What are the motivations and experiences of users in an academic community when publishing scientific information in an institutional repository? The focus group technique used in this study had three sessions. Results showed that 50% of the participants did not know the functionalities of the institutional repository nor its benefits. Users’ perceptions of platforms such as ResearchGate or Google Scholar that provide academic production were also identified. The findings showed that motivating an academic community to use an institutional repository requires technological functions, user guidelines that identify what can or cannot be published in open access, and training programs for open access publication practices and institutional repository use. These measures align with global strategies to strengthen the digital identities of scientific communities and thus benefit open science.
format article
author Laura Icela González-Pérez
María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya
Francisco José García-Peñalvo
author_facet Laura Icela González-Pérez
María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya
Francisco José García-Peñalvo
author_sort Laura Icela González-Pérez
title Improving Institutional Repositories through User-Centered Design: Indicators from a Focus Group
title_short Improving Institutional Repositories through User-Centered Design: Indicators from a Focus Group
title_full Improving Institutional Repositories through User-Centered Design: Indicators from a Focus Group
title_fullStr Improving Institutional Repositories through User-Centered Design: Indicators from a Focus Group
title_full_unstemmed Improving Institutional Repositories through User-Centered Design: Indicators from a Focus Group
title_sort improving institutional repositories through user-centered design: indicators from a focus group
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8a5203f6438f456d98fc0b8c5b439fe2
work_keys_str_mv AT lauraicelagonzalezperez improvinginstitutionalrepositoriesthroughusercentereddesignindicatorsfromafocusgroup
AT mariasoledadramirezmontoya improvinginstitutionalrepositoriesthroughusercentereddesignindicatorsfromafocusgroup
AT franciscojosegarciapenalvo improvinginstitutionalrepositoriesthroughusercentereddesignindicatorsfromafocusgroup
_version_ 1718412116163035136