Drive-by Photoscreening [Response to Letter]
Robert Arnold, 1 Mason Keffalos, 2 Samuel Martin 1 1Alaska Blind Child Discovery, Anchorage, AK, USA; 2Boise State University, Boise, ID, USACorrespondence: Robert ArnoldAlaska Blind Child Discovery, Alaska Children’s EYE & Strabismus, 3500, Latouche #280, Anchorage, AK, 99508, U...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/8a62840e3c284d32a6cab991d50d1327 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Robert Arnold, 1 Mason Keffalos, 2 Samuel Martin 1 1Alaska Blind Child Discovery, Anchorage, AK, USA; 2Boise State University, Boise, ID, USACorrespondence: Robert ArnoldAlaska Blind Child Discovery, Alaska Children’s EYE & Strabismus, 3500, Latouche #280, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USATel +1 907561-1917Fax +1 907563-5373Email eyedoc@alaska.net
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the excellent and informative letter by Dr. David Hunter.
For our attempt at Drive by Photoscreening,1 the wire-and-opaque-plastic shielded sufficient ambient light so that blinq could get a reading outdoors, but the performance of blinq suffered compared to conventional indoor use. We surmised this may have been due to the lack of facial view for the aiming beams, but we agree with Dr. Hunter that disruption of infrared light could also have been the culprit.
View the original paper by Keffalos and colleagues
This is in response to the Letter to the Editor
|
|---|