Drive-by Photoscreening [Response to Letter]

Robert Arnold, 1 Mason Keffalos, 2 Samuel Martin 1 1Alaska Blind Child Discovery, Anchorage, AK, USA; 2Boise State University, Boise, ID, USACorrespondence: Robert ArnoldAlaska Blind Child Discovery, Alaska Children’s EYE & Strabismus, 3500, Latouche #280, Anchorage, AK, 99508, U...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arnold R, Keffalos M, Martin S
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8a62840e3c284d32a6cab991d50d1327
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8a62840e3c284d32a6cab991d50d1327
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8a62840e3c284d32a6cab991d50d13272021-12-02T14:17:19ZDrive-by Photoscreening [Response to Letter]1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/8a62840e3c284d32a6cab991d50d13272021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/response-drive-by-photoscreening-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Robert Arnold, 1 Mason Keffalos, 2 Samuel Martin 1 1Alaska Blind Child Discovery, Anchorage, AK, USA; 2Boise State University, Boise, ID, USACorrespondence: Robert ArnoldAlaska Blind Child Discovery, Alaska Children’s EYE & Strabismus, 3500, Latouche #280, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USATel +1 907561-1917Fax +1 907563-5373Email eyedoc@alaska.net Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the excellent and informative letter by Dr. David Hunter. For our attempt at Drive by Photoscreening,1 the wire-and-opaque-plastic shielded sufficient ambient light so that blinq could get a reading outdoors, but the performance of blinq suffered compared to conventional indoor use. We surmised this may have been due to the lack of facial view for the aiming beams, but we agree with Dr. Hunter that disruption of infrared light could also have been the culprit.   View the original paper by Keffalos and colleagues   This is in response to the Letter to the Editor  Arnold RKeffalos MMartin SDove Medical PressarticleOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 15, Pp 1463-1464 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Arnold R
Keffalos M
Martin S
Drive-by Photoscreening [Response to Letter]
description Robert Arnold, 1 Mason Keffalos, 2 Samuel Martin 1 1Alaska Blind Child Discovery, Anchorage, AK, USA; 2Boise State University, Boise, ID, USACorrespondence: Robert ArnoldAlaska Blind Child Discovery, Alaska Children’s EYE & Strabismus, 3500, Latouche #280, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USATel +1 907561-1917Fax +1 907563-5373Email eyedoc@alaska.net Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the excellent and informative letter by Dr. David Hunter. For our attempt at Drive by Photoscreening,1 the wire-and-opaque-plastic shielded sufficient ambient light so that blinq could get a reading outdoors, but the performance of blinq suffered compared to conventional indoor use. We surmised this may have been due to the lack of facial view for the aiming beams, but we agree with Dr. Hunter that disruption of infrared light could also have been the culprit.   View the original paper by Keffalos and colleagues   This is in response to the Letter to the Editor  
format article
author Arnold R
Keffalos M
Martin S
author_facet Arnold R
Keffalos M
Martin S
author_sort Arnold R
title Drive-by Photoscreening [Response to Letter]
title_short Drive-by Photoscreening [Response to Letter]
title_full Drive-by Photoscreening [Response to Letter]
title_fullStr Drive-by Photoscreening [Response to Letter]
title_full_unstemmed Drive-by Photoscreening [Response to Letter]
title_sort drive-by photoscreening [response to letter]
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8a62840e3c284d32a6cab991d50d1327
work_keys_str_mv AT arnoldr drivebyphotoscreeningresponsetoletter
AT keffalosm drivebyphotoscreeningresponsetoletter
AT martins drivebyphotoscreeningresponsetoletter
_version_ 1718391618540666880