The Problem of Empiricism in Comparative Political Research by Muslims

The Islamic critique of the dominant Euro-American paradigm in the study of politics has so far focused on the subfields of political philosophy, as in the articles of Abul-Fadl, of public administration, and of international relation. Little attention has been paid by Muslim social scientists to c...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Theodore P. Wright
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: International Institute of Islamic Thought 1992
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8a704e451e304122afd43dc1bd71123f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8a704e451e304122afd43dc1bd71123f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8a704e451e304122afd43dc1bd71123f2021-12-02T17:47:04ZThe Problem of Empiricism in Comparative Political Research by Muslims10.35632/ajis.v9i1.25912690-37332690-3741https://doaj.org/article/8a704e451e304122afd43dc1bd71123f1992-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/2591https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3733https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3741 The Islamic critique of the dominant Euro-American paradigm in the study of politics has so far focused on the subfields of political philosophy, as in the articles of Abul-Fadl, of public administration, and of international relation. Little attention has been paid by Muslim social scientists to compamtive politics, by which is meant the investigation of the internal political institutions and processes of countries. As the name of the subfield implies, it is also intended to promote the comparison of political systems and processes across national and cultural boundaries in search of some useful generalizations about which structural arrangements are the most likely to promote whatever values, including Islamic ideals, the analyst may employ as hisher criteria for evaluation. True, there have been various books like Ahmad’s which explicate the Islamic political ideal as exemplified in the practice of the Prophet and the four rightly-guided caliphs. as well as books translating the Arabic terminology of Islam into its modern equivalents, such as M . Ahmed‘s Islamic Political System in the Modem Age, but these give little guidance to a political scientist wishing to conduct research into the empirical reality of present-day Muslim-ruled polities other than to condemn their deviation from the ideal Qur’anic model. For instance, must a contemporary Muslim political scientist reflexively castigate Pakistan for holding “free and fair elections” to its legislative bodies and praise the late president Zia ul-Haq for instituting an appointive majlis al shura to perform legislative functions simply because Western observers tend to disapprove of this on the gmunds that an appointive legislature does not meet the modern conception of democratic representation? It shall be the endeavor of this paper to undertake a critique of the concepts and value assumptions of the existing literature in the academic field of comparative politics in the hope of revealing the built-in European (”Judeo- Christian” or “secular-humanist”) biases and then to suggest an agenda of issues on which Muslim and non-Muslim scholars might agree. Among the unarticulated biases of Western comparative politics are: 1) secularism; 2) materialism; 3) analysis which distinguishes subcategories but often fails to integrate them in a “holistic” manner; 4) unilinear development according to a European historical model; 5) liberal individualism which values freedom and democracy over order and community; 6) quantification instead of qualitative methods; 7) egalitarianism; 8) empiricism; and 9) pragmatism. Among the few sympathetic American studies of existing Muslim political practices which avoid these biases have been Clark’s on the zakah system in Pakistan,’ Vogel’s dissertation on the Saudi judicial system, Kennedy’s study of the hudud ordinances in Pakistan, Sutcliffe's study on the compatibility of Islamic values with economic development in Jordan, and Wright’s analysis of the Shahbano Begum case which dealt with the maintenance of Muslim divorcees in India. Two Arab doctoral students have written such doctoral ... Theodore P. WrightInternational Institute of Islamic ThoughtarticleIslamBP1-253ENAmerican Journal of Islam and Society, Vol 9, Iss 1 (1992)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Islam
BP1-253
spellingShingle Islam
BP1-253
Theodore P. Wright
The Problem of Empiricism in Comparative Political Research by Muslims
description The Islamic critique of the dominant Euro-American paradigm in the study of politics has so far focused on the subfields of political philosophy, as in the articles of Abul-Fadl, of public administration, and of international relation. Little attention has been paid by Muslim social scientists to compamtive politics, by which is meant the investigation of the internal political institutions and processes of countries. As the name of the subfield implies, it is also intended to promote the comparison of political systems and processes across national and cultural boundaries in search of some useful generalizations about which structural arrangements are the most likely to promote whatever values, including Islamic ideals, the analyst may employ as hisher criteria for evaluation. True, there have been various books like Ahmad’s which explicate the Islamic political ideal as exemplified in the practice of the Prophet and the four rightly-guided caliphs. as well as books translating the Arabic terminology of Islam into its modern equivalents, such as M . Ahmed‘s Islamic Political System in the Modem Age, but these give little guidance to a political scientist wishing to conduct research into the empirical reality of present-day Muslim-ruled polities other than to condemn their deviation from the ideal Qur’anic model. For instance, must a contemporary Muslim political scientist reflexively castigate Pakistan for holding “free and fair elections” to its legislative bodies and praise the late president Zia ul-Haq for instituting an appointive majlis al shura to perform legislative functions simply because Western observers tend to disapprove of this on the gmunds that an appointive legislature does not meet the modern conception of democratic representation? It shall be the endeavor of this paper to undertake a critique of the concepts and value assumptions of the existing literature in the academic field of comparative politics in the hope of revealing the built-in European (”Judeo- Christian” or “secular-humanist”) biases and then to suggest an agenda of issues on which Muslim and non-Muslim scholars might agree. Among the unarticulated biases of Western comparative politics are: 1) secularism; 2) materialism; 3) analysis which distinguishes subcategories but often fails to integrate them in a “holistic” manner; 4) unilinear development according to a European historical model; 5) liberal individualism which values freedom and democracy over order and community; 6) quantification instead of qualitative methods; 7) egalitarianism; 8) empiricism; and 9) pragmatism. Among the few sympathetic American studies of existing Muslim political practices which avoid these biases have been Clark’s on the zakah system in Pakistan,’ Vogel’s dissertation on the Saudi judicial system, Kennedy’s study of the hudud ordinances in Pakistan, Sutcliffe's study on the compatibility of Islamic values with economic development in Jordan, and Wright’s analysis of the Shahbano Begum case which dealt with the maintenance of Muslim divorcees in India. Two Arab doctoral students have written such doctoral ...
format article
author Theodore P. Wright
author_facet Theodore P. Wright
author_sort Theodore P. Wright
title The Problem of Empiricism in Comparative Political Research by Muslims
title_short The Problem of Empiricism in Comparative Political Research by Muslims
title_full The Problem of Empiricism in Comparative Political Research by Muslims
title_fullStr The Problem of Empiricism in Comparative Political Research by Muslims
title_full_unstemmed The Problem of Empiricism in Comparative Political Research by Muslims
title_sort problem of empiricism in comparative political research by muslims
publisher International Institute of Islamic Thought
publishDate 1992
url https://doaj.org/article/8a704e451e304122afd43dc1bd71123f
work_keys_str_mv AT theodorepwright theproblemofempiricismincomparativepoliticalresearchbymuslims
AT theodorepwright problemofempiricismincomparativepoliticalresearchbymuslims
_version_ 1718379539026935808