LIPG endothelial lipase and breast cancer risk by subtypes

Abstract Experimental data showed that endothelial lipase (LIPG) is a crucial player in breast cancer. However, very limited data exists on the role of LIPG on the risk of breast cancer in humans. We examined the LIPG-breast cancer association within our population-based case–control study from Gali...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Carmen M. Redondo, Manuel Calaza, Marcos Matabuena, Maria A. Bermudez, Roman Perez-Fernandez, María Torres-Español, Ángel Carracedo, J. Esteban Castelao
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8a818072829441788ab4a112069dbab0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8a818072829441788ab4a112069dbab0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8a818072829441788ab4a112069dbab02021-12-02T16:51:04ZLIPG endothelial lipase and breast cancer risk by subtypes10.1038/s41598-021-89669-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/8a818072829441788ab4a112069dbab02021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89669-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Experimental data showed that endothelial lipase (LIPG) is a crucial player in breast cancer. However, very limited data exists on the role of LIPG on the risk of breast cancer in humans. We examined the LIPG-breast cancer association within our population-based case–control study from Galicia, Spain, BREOGAN (BREast Oncology GAlicia Network). Plasma LIPG and/or OxLDL were measured on 114 breast cancer cases and 82 controls from our case–control study, and were included in the present study. The risk of breast cancer increased with increasing levels of LIPG (multivariable OR for the highest category (95% CI) 2.52 (1.11–5.81), P-trend = 0.037). The LIPG-breast cancer association was restricted to Pre-menopausal breast cancer (Multivariable OR for the highest LIPG category (95% CI) 4.76 (0.94–28.77), P-trend = 0.06, and 1.79 (0.61–5.29), P-trend = 0.372, for Pre-menopausal and Post-menopausal breast cancer, respectively). The LIPG-breast cancer association was restricted to Luminal A breast cancers (Multivariable OR for the highest LIPG category (95% CI) 3.70 (1.42–10.16), P-trend = 0.015, and 2.05 (0.63–7.22), P-trend = 0.311, for Luminal A and non-Luminal A breast cancers, respectively). Subset analysis only based on HER2 receptor indicated that the LIPG-breast cancer relationship was restricted to HER2-negative breast cancers (Multivariable OR for the highest LIPG category (95% CI) 4.39 (1.70–12.03), P-trend = 0.012, and 1.10 (0.28–4.32), P-trend = 0.745, for HER2-negative and HER2-positive tumors, respectively). The LIPG-breast cancer association was restricted to women with high total cholesterol levels (Multivariable OR for the highest LIPG category (95% CI) 6.30 (2.13–20.05), P-trend = 0.018, and 0.65 (0.11–3.28), P-trend = 0.786, among women with high and low cholesterol levels, respectively). The LIPG-breast cancer association was also restricted to non-postpartum breast cancer (Multivariable OR for the highest LIPG category (95% CI) 3.83 (1.37–11.39), P-trend = 0.003, and 2.35 (0.16–63.65), P-trend = 0.396, for non-postpartum and postpartum breast cancer, respectively), although we lacked precision. The LIPG-breast cancer association was more pronounced among grades II and III than grade I breast cancers (Multivariable ORs for the highest category of LIPG (95% CI) 2.73 (1.02–7.69), P-trend = 0.057, and 1.90 (0.61–6.21), P-trend = 0.170, for grades II and III, and grade I breast cancers, respectively). No association was detected for OxLDL levels and breast cancer (Multivariable OR for the highest versus the lowest category (95% CI) 1.56 (0.56–4.32), P-trend = 0.457).Manuela Gago-DominguezCarmen M. RedondoManuel CalazaMarcos MatabuenaMaria A. BermudezRoman Perez-FernandezMaría Torres-EspañolÁngel CarracedoJ. Esteban CastelaoNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Manuela Gago-Dominguez
Carmen M. Redondo
Manuel Calaza
Marcos Matabuena
Maria A. Bermudez
Roman Perez-Fernandez
María Torres-Español
Ángel Carracedo
J. Esteban Castelao
LIPG endothelial lipase and breast cancer risk by subtypes
description Abstract Experimental data showed that endothelial lipase (LIPG) is a crucial player in breast cancer. However, very limited data exists on the role of LIPG on the risk of breast cancer in humans. We examined the LIPG-breast cancer association within our population-based case–control study from Galicia, Spain, BREOGAN (BREast Oncology GAlicia Network). Plasma LIPG and/or OxLDL were measured on 114 breast cancer cases and 82 controls from our case–control study, and were included in the present study. The risk of breast cancer increased with increasing levels of LIPG (multivariable OR for the highest category (95% CI) 2.52 (1.11–5.81), P-trend = 0.037). The LIPG-breast cancer association was restricted to Pre-menopausal breast cancer (Multivariable OR for the highest LIPG category (95% CI) 4.76 (0.94–28.77), P-trend = 0.06, and 1.79 (0.61–5.29), P-trend = 0.372, for Pre-menopausal and Post-menopausal breast cancer, respectively). The LIPG-breast cancer association was restricted to Luminal A breast cancers (Multivariable OR for the highest LIPG category (95% CI) 3.70 (1.42–10.16), P-trend = 0.015, and 2.05 (0.63–7.22), P-trend = 0.311, for Luminal A and non-Luminal A breast cancers, respectively). Subset analysis only based on HER2 receptor indicated that the LIPG-breast cancer relationship was restricted to HER2-negative breast cancers (Multivariable OR for the highest LIPG category (95% CI) 4.39 (1.70–12.03), P-trend = 0.012, and 1.10 (0.28–4.32), P-trend = 0.745, for HER2-negative and HER2-positive tumors, respectively). The LIPG-breast cancer association was restricted to women with high total cholesterol levels (Multivariable OR for the highest LIPG category (95% CI) 6.30 (2.13–20.05), P-trend = 0.018, and 0.65 (0.11–3.28), P-trend = 0.786, among women with high and low cholesterol levels, respectively). The LIPG-breast cancer association was also restricted to non-postpartum breast cancer (Multivariable OR for the highest LIPG category (95% CI) 3.83 (1.37–11.39), P-trend = 0.003, and 2.35 (0.16–63.65), P-trend = 0.396, for non-postpartum and postpartum breast cancer, respectively), although we lacked precision. The LIPG-breast cancer association was more pronounced among grades II and III than grade I breast cancers (Multivariable ORs for the highest category of LIPG (95% CI) 2.73 (1.02–7.69), P-trend = 0.057, and 1.90 (0.61–6.21), P-trend = 0.170, for grades II and III, and grade I breast cancers, respectively). No association was detected for OxLDL levels and breast cancer (Multivariable OR for the highest versus the lowest category (95% CI) 1.56 (0.56–4.32), P-trend = 0.457).
format article
author Manuela Gago-Dominguez
Carmen M. Redondo
Manuel Calaza
Marcos Matabuena
Maria A. Bermudez
Roman Perez-Fernandez
María Torres-Español
Ángel Carracedo
J. Esteban Castelao
author_facet Manuela Gago-Dominguez
Carmen M. Redondo
Manuel Calaza
Marcos Matabuena
Maria A. Bermudez
Roman Perez-Fernandez
María Torres-Español
Ángel Carracedo
J. Esteban Castelao
author_sort Manuela Gago-Dominguez
title LIPG endothelial lipase and breast cancer risk by subtypes
title_short LIPG endothelial lipase and breast cancer risk by subtypes
title_full LIPG endothelial lipase and breast cancer risk by subtypes
title_fullStr LIPG endothelial lipase and breast cancer risk by subtypes
title_full_unstemmed LIPG endothelial lipase and breast cancer risk by subtypes
title_sort lipg endothelial lipase and breast cancer risk by subtypes
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8a818072829441788ab4a112069dbab0
work_keys_str_mv AT manuelagagodominguez lipgendotheliallipaseandbreastcancerriskbysubtypes
AT carmenmredondo lipgendotheliallipaseandbreastcancerriskbysubtypes
AT manuelcalaza lipgendotheliallipaseandbreastcancerriskbysubtypes
AT marcosmatabuena lipgendotheliallipaseandbreastcancerriskbysubtypes
AT mariaabermudez lipgendotheliallipaseandbreastcancerriskbysubtypes
AT romanperezfernandez lipgendotheliallipaseandbreastcancerriskbysubtypes
AT mariatorresespanol lipgendotheliallipaseandbreastcancerriskbysubtypes
AT angelcarracedo lipgendotheliallipaseandbreastcancerriskbysubtypes
AT jestebancastelao lipgendotheliallipaseandbreastcancerriskbysubtypes
_version_ 1718382991304032256