Monitoring methods adapted to different perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity: Insights from a European qualitative study

The role of functional biodiversity for favouring natural regulation and reducing pesticide use in fruit production is generally acknowledged. Although a number of farmers attempt to favour biodiversity through different strategies (e.g. diversified hedges, nesting boxes), they often lack means to e...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Aurélie Cardona, Marc Tchamitchian, Servane Penvern, Arnaud Dufils, Stine Kramer Jacobsen, Maren Korsgaard, Mario Porcel, Weronika Świergiel, Marco Tasin, François Warlop, Lene Sigsgaard
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Elsevier 2021
Materias:	Orchard Management Ecosystem services Attitudes Stakeholders Participatory action research Ecology QH540-549.5
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/8a84b0bc4f8e4afa9a0f804255f08d6b
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:8a84b0bc4f8e4afa9a0f804255f08d6b
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:8a84b0bc4f8e4afa9a0f804255f08d6b2021-12-01T04:54:59ZMonitoring methods adapted to different perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity: Insights from a European qualitative study1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107883https://doaj.org/article/8a84b0bc4f8e4afa9a0f804255f08d6b2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21005483https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XThe role of functional biodiversity for favouring natural regulation and reducing pesticide use in fruit production is generally acknowledged. Although a number of farmers attempt to favour biodiversity through different strategies (e.g. diversified hedges, nesting boxes), they often lack means to evaluate how their actions contribute in practice to functional biodiversity. We assumed here that to create useful and appropriate monitoring methods, it is necessary to take into account the variety of knowledge, perceptions and interests about functional biodiversity. To test our hypothesis, we adopted a comprehensive and participative approach based on interviews and workshops with farmers, advisors and field agronomists involved in apple orchard management. Our objective was to understand their different perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity and then, to design monitoring methods adapted to those perceptions and pre-existing uses.Our findings revealed both a plurality of perceptions of functional biodiversity along with a diversity of objectives and uses of monitoring methods. Based on these results, we identified four main attitudes towards the management of functional biodiversity: the wait-and-see attitude, the naturalist attitude, the regulation attitude and the multifunctional attitude. These attitudes do not correspond to person’s profiles, since one person can adopt different attitudes in regard to different biodiversity components or in regard to the different practices supporting biodiversity. In addition, attitudes can vary over time. The identification of these attitudes allowed us to design, with the workshops’ participants, a guiding framework to create monitoring programs (i.e. combinations of monitoring methods) adapted to a variety of uses and targeted services.Aurélie CardonaMarc TchamitchianServane PenvernArnaud DufilsStine Kramer JacobsenMaren KorsgaardMario PorcelWeronika ŚwiergielMarco TasinFrançois WarlopLene SigsgaardElsevierarticleOrchardManagementEcosystem servicesAttitudesStakeholdersParticipatory action researchEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 129, Iss , Pp 107883- (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Orchard Management Ecosystem services Attitudes Stakeholders Participatory action research Ecology QH540-549.5
spellingShingle	Orchard Management Ecosystem services Attitudes Stakeholders Participatory action research Ecology QH540-549.5 Aurélie Cardona Marc Tchamitchian Servane Penvern Arnaud Dufils Stine Kramer Jacobsen Maren Korsgaard Mario Porcel Weronika Świergiel Marco Tasin François Warlop Lene Sigsgaard Monitoring methods adapted to different perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity: Insights from a European qualitative study
description	The role of functional biodiversity for favouring natural regulation and reducing pesticide use in fruit production is generally acknowledged. Although a number of farmers attempt to favour biodiversity through different strategies (e.g. diversified hedges, nesting boxes), they often lack means to evaluate how their actions contribute in practice to functional biodiversity. We assumed here that to create useful and appropriate monitoring methods, it is necessary to take into account the variety of knowledge, perceptions and interests about functional biodiversity. To test our hypothesis, we adopted a comprehensive and participative approach based on interviews and workshops with farmers, advisors and field agronomists involved in apple orchard management. Our objective was to understand their different perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity and then, to design monitoring methods adapted to those perceptions and pre-existing uses.Our findings revealed both a plurality of perceptions of functional biodiversity along with a diversity of objectives and uses of monitoring methods. Based on these results, we identified four main attitudes towards the management of functional biodiversity: the wait-and-see attitude, the naturalist attitude, the regulation attitude and the multifunctional attitude. These attitudes do not correspond to person’s profiles, since one person can adopt different attitudes in regard to different biodiversity components or in regard to the different practices supporting biodiversity. In addition, attitudes can vary over time. The identification of these attitudes allowed us to design, with the workshops’ participants, a guiding framework to create monitoring programs (i.e. combinations of monitoring methods) adapted to a variety of uses and targeted services.
format	article
author	Aurélie Cardona Marc Tchamitchian Servane Penvern Arnaud Dufils Stine Kramer Jacobsen Maren Korsgaard Mario Porcel Weronika Świergiel Marco Tasin François Warlop Lene Sigsgaard
author_facet	Aurélie Cardona Marc Tchamitchian Servane Penvern Arnaud Dufils Stine Kramer Jacobsen Maren Korsgaard Mario Porcel Weronika Świergiel Marco Tasin François Warlop Lene Sigsgaard
author_sort	Aurélie Cardona
title	Monitoring methods adapted to different perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity: Insights from a European qualitative study
title_short	Monitoring methods adapted to different perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity: Insights from a European qualitative study
title_full	Monitoring methods adapted to different perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity: Insights from a European qualitative study
title_fullStr	Monitoring methods adapted to different perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity: Insights from a European qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed	Monitoring methods adapted to different perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity: Insights from a European qualitative study
title_sort	monitoring methods adapted to different perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity: insights from a european qualitative study
publisher	Elsevier
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/8a84b0bc4f8e4afa9a0f804255f08d6b
work_keys_str_mv	AT aureliecardona monitoringmethodsadaptedtodifferentperceptionsandusesoffunctionalbiodiversityinsightsfromaeuropeanqualitativestudy AT marctchamitchian monitoringmethodsadaptedtodifferentperceptionsandusesoffunctionalbiodiversityinsightsfromaeuropeanqualitativestudy AT servanepenvern monitoringmethodsadaptedtodifferentperceptionsandusesoffunctionalbiodiversityinsightsfromaeuropeanqualitativestudy AT arnauddufils monitoringmethodsadaptedtodifferentperceptionsandusesoffunctionalbiodiversityinsightsfromaeuropeanqualitativestudy AT stinekramerjacobsen monitoringmethodsadaptedtodifferentperceptionsandusesoffunctionalbiodiversityinsightsfromaeuropeanqualitativestudy AT marenkorsgaard monitoringmethodsadaptedtodifferentperceptionsandusesoffunctionalbiodiversityinsightsfromaeuropeanqualitativestudy AT marioporcel monitoringmethodsadaptedtodifferentperceptionsandusesoffunctionalbiodiversityinsightsfromaeuropeanqualitativestudy AT weronikaswiergiel monitoringmethodsadaptedtodifferentperceptionsandusesoffunctionalbiodiversityinsightsfromaeuropeanqualitativestudy AT marcotasin monitoringmethodsadaptedtodifferentperceptionsandusesoffunctionalbiodiversityinsightsfromaeuropeanqualitativestudy AT francoiswarlop monitoringmethodsadaptedtodifferentperceptionsandusesoffunctionalbiodiversityinsightsfromaeuropeanqualitativestudy AT lenesigsgaard monitoringmethodsadaptedtodifferentperceptionsandusesoffunctionalbiodiversityinsightsfromaeuropeanqualitativestudy
_version_	1718405673374449664

Monitoring methods adapted to different perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity: Insights from a European qualitative study

Ejemplares similares