Evaluating a Taxonomy of Textual Uncertainty for Collaborative Visualisation in the Digital Humanities

The capture, modelling and visualisation of uncertainty has become a hot topic in many areas of science, such as the digital humanities (DH). Fuelled by critical voices among the DH community, DH scholars are becoming more aware of the intrinsic advantages that incorporating the notion of uncertaint...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alejandro Benito-Santos, Michelle Doran, Aleyda Rocha, Eveline Wandl-Vogt, Jennifer Edmond, Roberto Therón
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8aa28e713cd54eed857d14f37c5d08bf
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8aa28e713cd54eed857d14f37c5d08bf
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8aa28e713cd54eed857d14f37c5d08bf2021-11-25T17:58:23ZEvaluating a Taxonomy of Textual Uncertainty for Collaborative Visualisation in the Digital Humanities10.3390/info121104362078-2489https://doaj.org/article/8aa28e713cd54eed857d14f37c5d08bf2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/12/11/436https://doaj.org/toc/2078-2489The capture, modelling and visualisation of uncertainty has become a hot topic in many areas of science, such as the digital humanities (DH). Fuelled by critical voices among the DH community, DH scholars are becoming more aware of the intrinsic advantages that incorporating the notion of uncertainty into their workflows may bring. Additionally, the increasing availability of ubiquitous, web-based technologies has given rise to many collaborative tools that aim to support DH scholars in performing remote work alongside distant peers from other parts of the world. In this context, this paper describes two user studies seeking to evaluate a taxonomy of textual uncertainty aimed at enabling remote collaborations on digital humanities (DH) research objects in a digital medium. Our study focuses on the task of free annotation of uncertainty in texts in two different scenarios, seeking to establish the requirements of the underlying data and uncertainty models that would be needed to implement a hypothetical collaborative annotation system (CAS) that uses information visualisation and visual analytics techniques to leverage the cognitive effort implied by these tasks. To identify user needs and other requirements, we held two user-driven design experiences with DH experts and lay users, focusing on the annotation of uncertainty in historical recipes and literary texts. The lessons learned from these experiments are gathered in a series of insights and observations on how these different user groups collaborated to adapt an uncertainty taxonomy to solve the proposed exercises. Furthermore, we extract a series of recommendations and future lines of work that we share with the community in an attempt to establish a common agenda of DH research that focuses on collaboration around the idea of uncertainty.Alejandro Benito-SantosMichelle DoranAleyda RochaEveline Wandl-VogtJennifer EdmondRoberto TherónMDPI AGarticlehuman–computer interactiondigital humanitiescultural heritageinformation visualisationdata modellinguncertainty taxonomyInformation technologyT58.5-58.64ENInformation, Vol 12, Iss 436, p 436 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic human–computer interaction
digital humanities
cultural heritage
information visualisation
data modelling
uncertainty taxonomy
Information technology
T58.5-58.64
spellingShingle human–computer interaction
digital humanities
cultural heritage
information visualisation
data modelling
uncertainty taxonomy
Information technology
T58.5-58.64
Alejandro Benito-Santos
Michelle Doran
Aleyda Rocha
Eveline Wandl-Vogt
Jennifer Edmond
Roberto Therón
Evaluating a Taxonomy of Textual Uncertainty for Collaborative Visualisation in the Digital Humanities
description The capture, modelling and visualisation of uncertainty has become a hot topic in many areas of science, such as the digital humanities (DH). Fuelled by critical voices among the DH community, DH scholars are becoming more aware of the intrinsic advantages that incorporating the notion of uncertainty into their workflows may bring. Additionally, the increasing availability of ubiquitous, web-based technologies has given rise to many collaborative tools that aim to support DH scholars in performing remote work alongside distant peers from other parts of the world. In this context, this paper describes two user studies seeking to evaluate a taxonomy of textual uncertainty aimed at enabling remote collaborations on digital humanities (DH) research objects in a digital medium. Our study focuses on the task of free annotation of uncertainty in texts in two different scenarios, seeking to establish the requirements of the underlying data and uncertainty models that would be needed to implement a hypothetical collaborative annotation system (CAS) that uses information visualisation and visual analytics techniques to leverage the cognitive effort implied by these tasks. To identify user needs and other requirements, we held two user-driven design experiences with DH experts and lay users, focusing on the annotation of uncertainty in historical recipes and literary texts. The lessons learned from these experiments are gathered in a series of insights and observations on how these different user groups collaborated to adapt an uncertainty taxonomy to solve the proposed exercises. Furthermore, we extract a series of recommendations and future lines of work that we share with the community in an attempt to establish a common agenda of DH research that focuses on collaboration around the idea of uncertainty.
format article
author Alejandro Benito-Santos
Michelle Doran
Aleyda Rocha
Eveline Wandl-Vogt
Jennifer Edmond
Roberto Therón
author_facet Alejandro Benito-Santos
Michelle Doran
Aleyda Rocha
Eveline Wandl-Vogt
Jennifer Edmond
Roberto Therón
author_sort Alejandro Benito-Santos
title Evaluating a Taxonomy of Textual Uncertainty for Collaborative Visualisation in the Digital Humanities
title_short Evaluating a Taxonomy of Textual Uncertainty for Collaborative Visualisation in the Digital Humanities
title_full Evaluating a Taxonomy of Textual Uncertainty for Collaborative Visualisation in the Digital Humanities
title_fullStr Evaluating a Taxonomy of Textual Uncertainty for Collaborative Visualisation in the Digital Humanities
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating a Taxonomy of Textual Uncertainty for Collaborative Visualisation in the Digital Humanities
title_sort evaluating a taxonomy of textual uncertainty for collaborative visualisation in the digital humanities
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8aa28e713cd54eed857d14f37c5d08bf
work_keys_str_mv AT alejandrobenitosantos evaluatingataxonomyoftextualuncertaintyforcollaborativevisualisationinthedigitalhumanities
AT michelledoran evaluatingataxonomyoftextualuncertaintyforcollaborativevisualisationinthedigitalhumanities
AT aleydarocha evaluatingataxonomyoftextualuncertaintyforcollaborativevisualisationinthedigitalhumanities
AT evelinewandlvogt evaluatingataxonomyoftextualuncertaintyforcollaborativevisualisationinthedigitalhumanities
AT jenniferedmond evaluatingataxonomyoftextualuncertaintyforcollaborativevisualisationinthedigitalhumanities
AT robertotheron evaluatingataxonomyoftextualuncertaintyforcollaborativevisualisationinthedigitalhumanities
_version_ 1718411815346503680