Credible Mendelian Randomization Studies in the Presence of Selection Bias Using Control Exposures

Selection bias is increasingly acknowledged as a limitation of Mendelian randomization (MR). However, few methods exist to assess this issue. We focus on two plausible causal structures relevant to MR studies and illustrate the data-generating process underlying selection bias via simulation studies...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao Yang, C. Mary Schooling, Man Ki Kwok
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8adafa097ae04f409d5b2b2c4ca3dde3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8adafa097ae04f409d5b2b2c4ca3dde3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8adafa097ae04f409d5b2b2c4ca3dde32021-11-30T19:05:23ZCredible Mendelian Randomization Studies in the Presence of Selection Bias Using Control Exposures1664-802110.3389/fgene.2021.729326https://doaj.org/article/8adafa097ae04f409d5b2b2c4ca3dde32021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2021.729326/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/1664-8021Selection bias is increasingly acknowledged as a limitation of Mendelian randomization (MR). However, few methods exist to assess this issue. We focus on two plausible causal structures relevant to MR studies and illustrate the data-generating process underlying selection bias via simulation studies. We conceptualize the use of control exposures to validate MR estimates derived from selected samples by detecting potential selection bias and reproducing the exposure–outcome association of primary interest based on subject matter knowledge. We discuss the criteria for choosing the control exposures. We apply the proposal in an MR study investigating the potential effect of higher transferrin with stroke (including ischemic and cardioembolic stroke) using transferrin saturation and iron status as control exposures. Theoretically, selection bias affects associations of genetic instruments with the outcome in selected samples, violating the exclusion-restriction assumption and distorting MR estimates. Our applied example showing inconsistent effects of genetically predicted higher transferrin and higher transferrin saturation on stroke suggests the potential selection bias. Furthermore, the expected associations of genetically predicted higher iron status on stroke and longevity indicate no systematic selection bias. The routine use of control exposures in MR studies provides a valuable tool to validate estimated causal effects. Like the applied example, an antagonist, decoy, or exposure with similar biological activity as the exposure of primary interest, which has the same potential selection bias sources as the exposure–outcome association, is suggested as the control exposure. An additional or a validated control exposure with a well-established association with the outcome is also recommended to explore possible systematic selection bias.Zhao YangC. Mary SchoolingC. Mary SchoolingMan Ki KwokFrontiers Media S.A.articlecausal estimatescontrol exposuresMendelian randomizationreproducibleselection biasGeneticsQH426-470ENFrontiers in Genetics, Vol 12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic causal estimates
control exposures
Mendelian randomization
reproducible
selection bias
Genetics
QH426-470
spellingShingle causal estimates
control exposures
Mendelian randomization
reproducible
selection bias
Genetics
QH426-470
Zhao Yang
C. Mary Schooling
C. Mary Schooling
Man Ki Kwok
Credible Mendelian Randomization Studies in the Presence of Selection Bias Using Control Exposures
description Selection bias is increasingly acknowledged as a limitation of Mendelian randomization (MR). However, few methods exist to assess this issue. We focus on two plausible causal structures relevant to MR studies and illustrate the data-generating process underlying selection bias via simulation studies. We conceptualize the use of control exposures to validate MR estimates derived from selected samples by detecting potential selection bias and reproducing the exposure–outcome association of primary interest based on subject matter knowledge. We discuss the criteria for choosing the control exposures. We apply the proposal in an MR study investigating the potential effect of higher transferrin with stroke (including ischemic and cardioembolic stroke) using transferrin saturation and iron status as control exposures. Theoretically, selection bias affects associations of genetic instruments with the outcome in selected samples, violating the exclusion-restriction assumption and distorting MR estimates. Our applied example showing inconsistent effects of genetically predicted higher transferrin and higher transferrin saturation on stroke suggests the potential selection bias. Furthermore, the expected associations of genetically predicted higher iron status on stroke and longevity indicate no systematic selection bias. The routine use of control exposures in MR studies provides a valuable tool to validate estimated causal effects. Like the applied example, an antagonist, decoy, or exposure with similar biological activity as the exposure of primary interest, which has the same potential selection bias sources as the exposure–outcome association, is suggested as the control exposure. An additional or a validated control exposure with a well-established association with the outcome is also recommended to explore possible systematic selection bias.
format article
author Zhao Yang
C. Mary Schooling
C. Mary Schooling
Man Ki Kwok
author_facet Zhao Yang
C. Mary Schooling
C. Mary Schooling
Man Ki Kwok
author_sort Zhao Yang
title Credible Mendelian Randomization Studies in the Presence of Selection Bias Using Control Exposures
title_short Credible Mendelian Randomization Studies in the Presence of Selection Bias Using Control Exposures
title_full Credible Mendelian Randomization Studies in the Presence of Selection Bias Using Control Exposures
title_fullStr Credible Mendelian Randomization Studies in the Presence of Selection Bias Using Control Exposures
title_full_unstemmed Credible Mendelian Randomization Studies in the Presence of Selection Bias Using Control Exposures
title_sort credible mendelian randomization studies in the presence of selection bias using control exposures
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8adafa097ae04f409d5b2b2c4ca3dde3
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoyang crediblemendelianrandomizationstudiesinthepresenceofselectionbiasusingcontrolexposures
AT cmaryschooling crediblemendelianrandomizationstudiesinthepresenceofselectionbiasusingcontrolexposures
AT cmaryschooling crediblemendelianrandomizationstudiesinthepresenceofselectionbiasusingcontrolexposures
AT mankikwok crediblemendelianrandomizationstudiesinthepresenceofselectionbiasusingcontrolexposures
_version_ 1718406338461040640