Universal definition of loss to follow-up in HIV treatment programs: a statistical analysis of 111 facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.

<h4>Background</h4>Although patient attrition is recognized as a threat to the long-term success of antiretroviral therapy programs worldwide, there is no universal definition for classifying patients as lost to follow-up (LTFU). We analyzed data from health facilities across Africa, Asi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benjamin H Chi, Constantin T Yiannoutsos, Andrew O Westfall, Jamie E Newman, Jialun Zhou, Carina Cesar, Martin W G Brinkhof, Albert Mwango, Eric Balestre, Gabriela Carriquiry, Thira Sirisanthana, Henri Mukumbi, Jeffrey N Martin, Anna Grimsrud, Melanie Bacon, Rodolphe Thiebaut, International Epidemiologic Databases to Evaluate AIDS Collaboration
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8ae9f80d513e422c9f692e2639bb3cab
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8ae9f80d513e422c9f692e2639bb3cab
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8ae9f80d513e422c9f692e2639bb3cab2021-11-18T05:42:29ZUniversal definition of loss to follow-up in HIV treatment programs: a statistical analysis of 111 facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.1549-12771549-167610.1371/journal.pmed.1001111https://doaj.org/article/8ae9f80d513e422c9f692e2639bb3cab2011-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22039357/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1549-1277https://doaj.org/toc/1549-1676<h4>Background</h4>Although patient attrition is recognized as a threat to the long-term success of antiretroviral therapy programs worldwide, there is no universal definition for classifying patients as lost to follow-up (LTFU). We analyzed data from health facilities across Africa, Asia, and Latin America to empirically determine a standard LTFU definition.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>At a set "status classification" date, patients were categorized as either "active" or "LTFU" according to different intervals from time of last clinic encounter. For each threshold, we looked forward 365 d to assess the performance and accuracy of this initial classification. The best-performing definition for LTFU had the lowest proportion of patients misclassified as active or LTFU. Observational data from 111 health facilities-representing 180,718 patients from 19 countries-were included in this study. In the primary analysis, for which data from all facilities were pooled, an interval of 180 d (95% confidence interval [CI]: 173-181 d) since last patient encounter resulted in the fewest misclassifications (7.7%, 95% CI: 7.6%-7.8%). A secondary analysis that gave equal weight to cohorts and to regions generated a similar result (175 d); however, an alternate approach that used inverse weighting for cohorts based on variance and equal weighting for regions produced a slightly lower summary measure (150 d). When examined at the facility level, the best-performing definition varied from 58 to 383 d (mean=150 d), but when a standard definition of 180 d was applied to each facility, only slight increases in misclassification (mean=1.2%, 95% CI: 1.0%-1.5%) were observed. Using this definition, the proportion of patients classified as LTFU by facility ranged from 3.1% to 45.1% (mean=19.9%, 95% CI: 19.1%-21.7%).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Based on this evaluation, we recommend the adoption of ≥180 d since the last clinic visit as a standard LTFU definition. Such standardization is an important step to understanding the reasons that underlie patient attrition and establishing more reliable and comparable program evaluation worldwide. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.Benjamin H ChiConstantin T YiannoutsosAndrew O WestfallJamie E NewmanJialun ZhouCarina CesarMartin W G BrinkhofAlbert MwangoEric BalestreGabriela CarriquiryThira SirisanthanaHenri MukumbiJeffrey N MartinAnna GrimsrudMelanie BaconRodolphe ThiebautInternational Epidemiologic Databases to Evaluate AIDS CollaborationPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRENPLoS Medicine, Vol 8, Iss 10, p e1001111 (2011)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Benjamin H Chi
Constantin T Yiannoutsos
Andrew O Westfall
Jamie E Newman
Jialun Zhou
Carina Cesar
Martin W G Brinkhof
Albert Mwango
Eric Balestre
Gabriela Carriquiry
Thira Sirisanthana
Henri Mukumbi
Jeffrey N Martin
Anna Grimsrud
Melanie Bacon
Rodolphe Thiebaut
International Epidemiologic Databases to Evaluate AIDS Collaboration
Universal definition of loss to follow-up in HIV treatment programs: a statistical analysis of 111 facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
description <h4>Background</h4>Although patient attrition is recognized as a threat to the long-term success of antiretroviral therapy programs worldwide, there is no universal definition for classifying patients as lost to follow-up (LTFU). We analyzed data from health facilities across Africa, Asia, and Latin America to empirically determine a standard LTFU definition.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>At a set "status classification" date, patients were categorized as either "active" or "LTFU" according to different intervals from time of last clinic encounter. For each threshold, we looked forward 365 d to assess the performance and accuracy of this initial classification. The best-performing definition for LTFU had the lowest proportion of patients misclassified as active or LTFU. Observational data from 111 health facilities-representing 180,718 patients from 19 countries-were included in this study. In the primary analysis, for which data from all facilities were pooled, an interval of 180 d (95% confidence interval [CI]: 173-181 d) since last patient encounter resulted in the fewest misclassifications (7.7%, 95% CI: 7.6%-7.8%). A secondary analysis that gave equal weight to cohorts and to regions generated a similar result (175 d); however, an alternate approach that used inverse weighting for cohorts based on variance and equal weighting for regions produced a slightly lower summary measure (150 d). When examined at the facility level, the best-performing definition varied from 58 to 383 d (mean=150 d), but when a standard definition of 180 d was applied to each facility, only slight increases in misclassification (mean=1.2%, 95% CI: 1.0%-1.5%) were observed. Using this definition, the proportion of patients classified as LTFU by facility ranged from 3.1% to 45.1% (mean=19.9%, 95% CI: 19.1%-21.7%).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Based on this evaluation, we recommend the adoption of ≥180 d since the last clinic visit as a standard LTFU definition. Such standardization is an important step to understanding the reasons that underlie patient attrition and establishing more reliable and comparable program evaluation worldwide. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
format article
author Benjamin H Chi
Constantin T Yiannoutsos
Andrew O Westfall
Jamie E Newman
Jialun Zhou
Carina Cesar
Martin W G Brinkhof
Albert Mwango
Eric Balestre
Gabriela Carriquiry
Thira Sirisanthana
Henri Mukumbi
Jeffrey N Martin
Anna Grimsrud
Melanie Bacon
Rodolphe Thiebaut
International Epidemiologic Databases to Evaluate AIDS Collaboration
author_facet Benjamin H Chi
Constantin T Yiannoutsos
Andrew O Westfall
Jamie E Newman
Jialun Zhou
Carina Cesar
Martin W G Brinkhof
Albert Mwango
Eric Balestre
Gabriela Carriquiry
Thira Sirisanthana
Henri Mukumbi
Jeffrey N Martin
Anna Grimsrud
Melanie Bacon
Rodolphe Thiebaut
International Epidemiologic Databases to Evaluate AIDS Collaboration
author_sort Benjamin H Chi
title Universal definition of loss to follow-up in HIV treatment programs: a statistical analysis of 111 facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
title_short Universal definition of loss to follow-up in HIV treatment programs: a statistical analysis of 111 facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
title_full Universal definition of loss to follow-up in HIV treatment programs: a statistical analysis of 111 facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
title_fullStr Universal definition of loss to follow-up in HIV treatment programs: a statistical analysis of 111 facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
title_full_unstemmed Universal definition of loss to follow-up in HIV treatment programs: a statistical analysis of 111 facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
title_sort universal definition of loss to follow-up in hiv treatment programs: a statistical analysis of 111 facilities in africa, asia, and latin america.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2011
url https://doaj.org/article/8ae9f80d513e422c9f692e2639bb3cab
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminhchi universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT constantintyiannoutsos universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT andrewowestfall universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT jamieenewman universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT jialunzhou universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT carinacesar universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT martinwgbrinkhof universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT albertmwango universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT ericbalestre universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT gabrielacarriquiry universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT thirasirisanthana universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT henrimukumbi universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT jeffreynmartin universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT annagrimsrud universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT melaniebacon universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT rodolphethiebaut universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT internationalepidemiologicdatabasestoevaluateaidscollaboration universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
_version_ 1718424798731698176