Biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests

Abstract Managed forests are a key component of strategies aimed at tackling the climate and biodiversity crises. Tapping this potential requires a better understanding of the complex, simultaneous effects of forest management on biodiversity, carbon stocks and productivity. Here, we used data of 13...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas Asbeck, Francesco Sabatini, Andrey L. D. Augustynczik, Marco Basile, Jan Helbach, Marlotte Jonker, Anna Knuff, Jürgen Bauhus
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8af74b99b3134dc39b384889e0876a32
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8af74b99b3134dc39b384889e0876a32
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8af74b99b3134dc39b384889e0876a322021-12-02T14:01:33ZBiodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests10.1038/s41598-020-80499-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/8af74b99b3134dc39b384889e0876a322021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80499-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Managed forests are a key component of strategies aimed at tackling the climate and biodiversity crises. Tapping this potential requires a better understanding of the complex, simultaneous effects of forest management on biodiversity, carbon stocks and productivity. Here, we used data of 135 one-hectare plots from southwestern Germany to disentangle the relative influence of gradients of management intensity, carbon stocks and forest productivity on different components of forest biodiversity (birds, bats, insects, plants) and tree-related microhabitats. We tested whether the composition of taxonomic groups varies gradually or abruptly along these gradients. The richness of taxonomic groups was rather insensitive to management intensity, carbon stocks and forest productivity. Despite the low explanatory power of the main predictor variables, forest management had the greatest relative influence on richness of insects and tree-related microhabitats, while carbon stocks influenced richness of bats, birds, vascular plants and pooled taxa. Species composition changed relatively abruptly along the management intensity gradient, while changes along carbon and productivity gradients were more gradual. We conclude that moderate increases in forest management intensity and carbon stocks, within the range of variation observed in our study system, might be compatible with biodiversity and climate mitigation objectives in managed forests.Thomas AsbeckFrancesco SabatiniAndrey L. D. AugustynczikMarco BasileJan HelbachMarlotte JonkerAnna KnuffJürgen BauhusNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Thomas Asbeck
Francesco Sabatini
Andrey L. D. Augustynczik
Marco Basile
Jan Helbach
Marlotte Jonker
Anna Knuff
Jürgen Bauhus
Biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests
description Abstract Managed forests are a key component of strategies aimed at tackling the climate and biodiversity crises. Tapping this potential requires a better understanding of the complex, simultaneous effects of forest management on biodiversity, carbon stocks and productivity. Here, we used data of 135 one-hectare plots from southwestern Germany to disentangle the relative influence of gradients of management intensity, carbon stocks and forest productivity on different components of forest biodiversity (birds, bats, insects, plants) and tree-related microhabitats. We tested whether the composition of taxonomic groups varies gradually or abruptly along these gradients. The richness of taxonomic groups was rather insensitive to management intensity, carbon stocks and forest productivity. Despite the low explanatory power of the main predictor variables, forest management had the greatest relative influence on richness of insects and tree-related microhabitats, while carbon stocks influenced richness of bats, birds, vascular plants and pooled taxa. Species composition changed relatively abruptly along the management intensity gradient, while changes along carbon and productivity gradients were more gradual. We conclude that moderate increases in forest management intensity and carbon stocks, within the range of variation observed in our study system, might be compatible with biodiversity and climate mitigation objectives in managed forests.
format article
author Thomas Asbeck
Francesco Sabatini
Andrey L. D. Augustynczik
Marco Basile
Jan Helbach
Marlotte Jonker
Anna Knuff
Jürgen Bauhus
author_facet Thomas Asbeck
Francesco Sabatini
Andrey L. D. Augustynczik
Marco Basile
Jan Helbach
Marlotte Jonker
Anna Knuff
Jürgen Bauhus
author_sort Thomas Asbeck
title Biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests
title_short Biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests
title_full Biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests
title_fullStr Biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests
title_full_unstemmed Biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests
title_sort biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8af74b99b3134dc39b384889e0876a32
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasasbeck biodiversityresponsetoforestmanagementintensitycarbonstocksandnetprimaryproductionintemperatemontaneforests
AT francescosabatini biodiversityresponsetoforestmanagementintensitycarbonstocksandnetprimaryproductionintemperatemontaneforests
AT andreyldaugustynczik biodiversityresponsetoforestmanagementintensitycarbonstocksandnetprimaryproductionintemperatemontaneforests
AT marcobasile biodiversityresponsetoforestmanagementintensitycarbonstocksandnetprimaryproductionintemperatemontaneforests
AT janhelbach biodiversityresponsetoforestmanagementintensitycarbonstocksandnetprimaryproductionintemperatemontaneforests
AT marlottejonker biodiversityresponsetoforestmanagementintensitycarbonstocksandnetprimaryproductionintemperatemontaneforests
AT annaknuff biodiversityresponsetoforestmanagementintensitycarbonstocksandnetprimaryproductionintemperatemontaneforests
AT jurgenbauhus biodiversityresponsetoforestmanagementintensitycarbonstocksandnetprimaryproductionintemperatemontaneforests
_version_ 1718392154660798464