Biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests
Abstract Managed forests are a key component of strategies aimed at tackling the climate and biodiversity crises. Tapping this potential requires a better understanding of the complex, simultaneous effects of forest management on biodiversity, carbon stocks and productivity. Here, we used data of 13...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/8af74b99b3134dc39b384889e0876a32 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:8af74b99b3134dc39b384889e0876a32 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:8af74b99b3134dc39b384889e0876a322021-12-02T14:01:33ZBiodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests10.1038/s41598-020-80499-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/8af74b99b3134dc39b384889e0876a322021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80499-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Managed forests are a key component of strategies aimed at tackling the climate and biodiversity crises. Tapping this potential requires a better understanding of the complex, simultaneous effects of forest management on biodiversity, carbon stocks and productivity. Here, we used data of 135 one-hectare plots from southwestern Germany to disentangle the relative influence of gradients of management intensity, carbon stocks and forest productivity on different components of forest biodiversity (birds, bats, insects, plants) and tree-related microhabitats. We tested whether the composition of taxonomic groups varies gradually or abruptly along these gradients. The richness of taxonomic groups was rather insensitive to management intensity, carbon stocks and forest productivity. Despite the low explanatory power of the main predictor variables, forest management had the greatest relative influence on richness of insects and tree-related microhabitats, while carbon stocks influenced richness of bats, birds, vascular plants and pooled taxa. Species composition changed relatively abruptly along the management intensity gradient, while changes along carbon and productivity gradients were more gradual. We conclude that moderate increases in forest management intensity and carbon stocks, within the range of variation observed in our study system, might be compatible with biodiversity and climate mitigation objectives in managed forests.Thomas AsbeckFrancesco SabatiniAndrey L. D. AugustynczikMarco BasileJan HelbachMarlotte JonkerAnna KnuffJürgen BauhusNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Thomas Asbeck Francesco Sabatini Andrey L. D. Augustynczik Marco Basile Jan Helbach Marlotte Jonker Anna Knuff Jürgen Bauhus Biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests |
description |
Abstract Managed forests are a key component of strategies aimed at tackling the climate and biodiversity crises. Tapping this potential requires a better understanding of the complex, simultaneous effects of forest management on biodiversity, carbon stocks and productivity. Here, we used data of 135 one-hectare plots from southwestern Germany to disentangle the relative influence of gradients of management intensity, carbon stocks and forest productivity on different components of forest biodiversity (birds, bats, insects, plants) and tree-related microhabitats. We tested whether the composition of taxonomic groups varies gradually or abruptly along these gradients. The richness of taxonomic groups was rather insensitive to management intensity, carbon stocks and forest productivity. Despite the low explanatory power of the main predictor variables, forest management had the greatest relative influence on richness of insects and tree-related microhabitats, while carbon stocks influenced richness of bats, birds, vascular plants and pooled taxa. Species composition changed relatively abruptly along the management intensity gradient, while changes along carbon and productivity gradients were more gradual. We conclude that moderate increases in forest management intensity and carbon stocks, within the range of variation observed in our study system, might be compatible with biodiversity and climate mitigation objectives in managed forests. |
format |
article |
author |
Thomas Asbeck Francesco Sabatini Andrey L. D. Augustynczik Marco Basile Jan Helbach Marlotte Jonker Anna Knuff Jürgen Bauhus |
author_facet |
Thomas Asbeck Francesco Sabatini Andrey L. D. Augustynczik Marco Basile Jan Helbach Marlotte Jonker Anna Knuff Jürgen Bauhus |
author_sort |
Thomas Asbeck |
title |
Biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests |
title_short |
Biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests |
title_full |
Biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests |
title_fullStr |
Biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests |
title_sort |
biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/8af74b99b3134dc39b384889e0876a32 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT thomasasbeck biodiversityresponsetoforestmanagementintensitycarbonstocksandnetprimaryproductionintemperatemontaneforests AT francescosabatini biodiversityresponsetoforestmanagementintensitycarbonstocksandnetprimaryproductionintemperatemontaneforests AT andreyldaugustynczik biodiversityresponsetoforestmanagementintensitycarbonstocksandnetprimaryproductionintemperatemontaneforests AT marcobasile biodiversityresponsetoforestmanagementintensitycarbonstocksandnetprimaryproductionintemperatemontaneforests AT janhelbach biodiversityresponsetoforestmanagementintensitycarbonstocksandnetprimaryproductionintemperatemontaneforests AT marlottejonker biodiversityresponsetoforestmanagementintensitycarbonstocksandnetprimaryproductionintemperatemontaneforests AT annaknuff biodiversityresponsetoforestmanagementintensitycarbonstocksandnetprimaryproductionintemperatemontaneforests AT jurgenbauhus biodiversityresponsetoforestmanagementintensitycarbonstocksandnetprimaryproductionintemperatemontaneforests |
_version_ |
1718392154660798464 |