Dostoevsky’s Dialog and Polemics with Formal and Naïve Theological Beliefs
The article considers the issue of criteria Dostoevsky relied on in his approach to systems and views related to theological anthropologies that are either directly formulated or indirectly manifested in various texts from translations of the New Testament to folkloric legends. There are several are...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN RU |
| Publicado: |
Russian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/8bd282eb05a8469c9385aca7dfb2b1b5 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:8bd282eb05a8469c9385aca7dfb2b1b5 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:8bd282eb05a8469c9385aca7dfb2b1b52021-11-25T07:10:32ZDostoevsky’s Dialog and Polemics with Formal and Naïve Theological Beliefs10.22455/2619-0311-2019-2-124-1452619-03112712-8512https://doaj.org/article/8bd282eb05a8469c9385aca7dfb2b1b52019-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dostmirkult.ru/images/DOST_2019-26-intern1-125-146.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2619-0311https://doaj.org/toc/2712-8512The article considers the issue of criteria Dostoevsky relied on in his approach to systems and views related to theological anthropologies that are either directly formulated or indirectly manifested in various texts from translations of the New Testament to folkloric legends. There are several areas of influence: the Bible in various translations, formal theology, formal philosophy, naïve folk theology, and those views of other writers that can be characterized as theological. In his works, Dostoevsky is engaged in a constant dialog and/or polemics with diverse theological systems and those philosophical systems that are related to theology. Such systems include the Orthodox theology of deification, formal Catholic theology, naïve folk theology reflected in folklore, Auguste Comte’s religion of humanity, and also religious and philosophical anthropology of other writers and poets. In the matter of accepting/rejecting entire systems or individual ideas, in the question of choosing between different formal and naïve theological views, Dostoevsky is primarily guided by his own theology of love. The article will offer a concise consideration of several examples of Dostoevsky’s direct and concealed engagement with various theological systems, and examples of using one system to conduct polemics with another one and to affirm Dostoevsky’s own theology of love for God and humans and for humans and God.Tatyana V. KovalevskayaRussian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literaturearticlethomas aquinasauguste comterussian folk spiritual versesgogol“the terrible vengeance”isaac the syrianreligious and philosophical anthropologySlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665ENRUДостоевский и мировая культура: Филологический журнал, Iss 2, Pp 124-145 (2019) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN RU |
| topic |
thomas aquinas auguste comte russian folk spiritual verses gogol “the terrible vengeance” isaac the syrian religious and philosophical anthropology Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 |
| spellingShingle |
thomas aquinas auguste comte russian folk spiritual verses gogol “the terrible vengeance” isaac the syrian religious and philosophical anthropology Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 Tatyana V. Kovalevskaya Dostoevsky’s Dialog and Polemics with Formal and Naïve Theological Beliefs |
| description |
The article considers the issue of criteria Dostoevsky relied on in his approach to systems and views related to theological anthropologies that are either directly formulated or indirectly manifested in various texts from translations of the New Testament to folkloric legends. There are several areas of influence: the Bible in various translations, formal theology, formal philosophy, naïve folk theology, and those views of other writers that can be characterized as theological. In his works, Dostoevsky is engaged in a constant dialog and/or polemics with diverse theological systems and those philosophical systems that are related to theology. Such systems include the Orthodox theology of deification, formal Catholic theology, naïve folk theology reflected in folklore, Auguste Comte’s religion of humanity, and also religious and philosophical anthropology of other writers and poets. In the matter of accepting/rejecting entire systems or individual ideas, in the question of choosing between different formal and naïve theological views, Dostoevsky is primarily guided by his own theology of love. The article will offer a concise consideration of several examples of Dostoevsky’s direct and concealed engagement with various theological systems, and examples of using one system to conduct polemics with another one and to affirm Dostoevsky’s own theology of love for God and humans and for humans and God. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Tatyana V. Kovalevskaya |
| author_facet |
Tatyana V. Kovalevskaya |
| author_sort |
Tatyana V. Kovalevskaya |
| title |
Dostoevsky’s Dialog and Polemics with Formal and Naïve Theological Beliefs |
| title_short |
Dostoevsky’s Dialog and Polemics with Formal and Naïve Theological Beliefs |
| title_full |
Dostoevsky’s Dialog and Polemics with Formal and Naïve Theological Beliefs |
| title_fullStr |
Dostoevsky’s Dialog and Polemics with Formal and Naïve Theological Beliefs |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Dostoevsky’s Dialog and Polemics with Formal and Naïve Theological Beliefs |
| title_sort |
dostoevsky’s dialog and polemics with formal and naïve theological beliefs |
| publisher |
Russian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/8bd282eb05a8469c9385aca7dfb2b1b5 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT tatyanavkovalevskaya dostoevskysdialogandpolemicswithformalandnaivetheologicalbeliefs |
| _version_ |
1718413631323897856 |