The “Ought” Implies “Can” Principle: A Challenge to Collective Intentionality

In my paper I investigate collective intentionality (CI) through the “Ought” implies “Can” (OIC) principle. My leading question is does OIC impose any further requirement on CI? In answering the challenge inside a Searlean framework, I realize that we need to clarify what CI’s structure is and what...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Guglielmo Feis
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR IT
Publicado:	Rosenberg & Sellier 2016
Materias:	collective intentionality ought implies can Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/8c5c7e3d260540109c880cca8568fdc7
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:8c5c7e3d260540109c880cca8568fdc7
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:8c5c7e3d260540109c880cca8568fdc72021-12-02T09:25:46ZThe “Ought” Implies “Can” Principle: A Challenge to Collective Intentionality10.13128/Phe_Mi-196312280-78532239-4028https://doaj.org/article/8c5c7e3d260540109c880cca8568fdc72016-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7078https://doaj.org/toc/2280-7853https://doaj.org/toc/2239-4028 In my paper I investigate collective intentionality (CI) through the “Ought” implies “Can” (OIC) principle. My leading question is does OIC impose any further requirement on CI? In answering the challenge inside a Searlean framework, I realize that we need to clarify what CI’s structure is and what kind of role the agents joining a CI-act have. In the last part of the paper, I put forward an (inverted) Hartian framework to allow the Searlean CI theory to be agent sensitive and cope with the problems that emerged. Guglielmo FeisRosenberg & Sellierarticlecollective intentionalityought implies canAestheticsBH1-301EthicsBJ1-1725ENFRITPhenomenology and Mind, Iss 2 (2016)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR IT
topic	collective intentionality ought implies can Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725
spellingShingle	collective intentionality ought implies can Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725 Guglielmo Feis The “Ought” Implies “Can” Principle: A Challenge to Collective Intentionality
description	In my paper I investigate collective intentionality (CI) through the “Ought” implies “Can” (OIC) principle. My leading question is does OIC impose any further requirement on CI? In answering the challenge inside a Searlean framework, I realize that we need to clarify what CI’s structure is and what kind of role the agents joining a CI-act have. In the last part of the paper, I put forward an (inverted) Hartian framework to allow the Searlean CI theory to be agent sensitive and cope with the problems that emerged.
format	article
author	Guglielmo Feis
author_facet	Guglielmo Feis
author_sort	Guglielmo Feis
title	The “Ought” Implies “Can” Principle: A Challenge to Collective Intentionality
title_short	The “Ought” Implies “Can” Principle: A Challenge to Collective Intentionality
title_full	The “Ought” Implies “Can” Principle: A Challenge to Collective Intentionality
title_fullStr	The “Ought” Implies “Can” Principle: A Challenge to Collective Intentionality
title_full_unstemmed	The “Ought” Implies “Can” Principle: A Challenge to Collective Intentionality
title_sort	“ought” implies “can” principle: a challenge to collective intentionality
publisher	Rosenberg & Sellier
publishDate	2016
url	https://doaj.org/article/8c5c7e3d260540109c880cca8568fdc7
work_keys_str_mv	AT guglielmofeis theoughtimpliescanprincipleachallengetocollectiveintentionality AT guglielmofeis oughtimpliescanprincipleachallengetocollectiveintentionality
_version_	1718398133989277696

The “Ought” Implies “Can” Principle: A Challenge to Collective Intentionality

Ejemplares similares