The “Ought” Implies “Can” Principle: A Challenge to Collective Intentionality
In my paper I investigate collective intentionality (CI) through the “Ought” implies “Can” (OIC) principle. My leading question is does OIC impose any further requirement on CI? In answering the challenge inside a Searlean framework, I realize that we need to clarify what CI’s structure is and what...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | Guglielmo Feis |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN FR IT |
Publicado: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/8c5c7e3d260540109c880cca8568fdc7 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Collective intentionality vs. intersubjective and social intentionality. An account of collective intentionality as shared intentionality
por: Francesca De Vecchi
Publicado: (2016) -
Collective Intentionality: A Human – not a Monkey – Business
por: Angelica Kaufmann
Publicado: (2016) -
The Phenomenological Background of Collective Positionality
por: Emanuele Caminada
Publicado: (2016) -
Subject, Mode and Content in “We-Intentions”
por: Michael Wilby
Publicado: (2016) -
Is Affective Intentionality Necessarily Irrelevant in Social Cognition?
por: Sarah Songhorian
Publicado: (2016)