Biased belief updating and suboptimal choice in foraging decisions
In some types of decision-making, people must accept or forego an option without knowing what prospects might later be available. Here, the authors reveal how a key bias– asymmetric learning from negative versus positive outcomes – emerges in this type of decision.
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Neil Garrett, Nathaniel D. Daw |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/8c6045e87931412a8dc8e0a85a024671 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Reminders of past choices bias decisions for reward in humans
por: Aaron M. Bornstein, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The suboptimality of perceptual decision making with multiple alternatives
por: Jiwon Yeon, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Decisions bias future choices by modifying hippocampal associative memories
por: Lennart Luettgau, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Pupil-linked arousal is driven by decision uncertainty and alters serial choice bias
por: Anne E. Urai, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
A nonlinear updating algorithm captures suboptimal inference in the presence of signal-dependent noise
por: Seth W. Egger, et al.
Publicado: (2018)