Indicator development for assessing recreational ecosystem service capacity of urban green spaces– A participatory approach

Developing indicators to assess the capacity of green spaces to deliver recreational ecosystem service (RES) is essential but challenging because recreation is an intangible ecosystem service that is subjective among individuals. The purpose of this paper is to develop indicators for assessing the R...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Senait Nigussie, Li Liu, Kumelachew Yeshitela
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8c77a525ccf443cf9eec14160e1cedc2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8c77a525ccf443cf9eec14160e1cedc2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8c77a525ccf443cf9eec14160e1cedc22021-12-01T04:32:48ZIndicator development for assessing recreational ecosystem service capacity of urban green spaces– A participatory approach1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107026https://doaj.org/article/8c77a525ccf443cf9eec14160e1cedc22021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X20309651https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XDeveloping indicators to assess the capacity of green spaces to deliver recreational ecosystem service (RES) is essential but challenging because recreation is an intangible ecosystem service that is subjective among individuals. The purpose of this paper is to develop indicators for assessing the RES delivering capacity of the existing green spaces to assist green space planning in Little Akaki River catchment, located in central Ethiopia. The development of indicators follows the identification of indicators, conceptualization, calculation, communication, and ranking of indicator phases. We involved the society in identification of indicators, conceptualization, and communication phases. The result reveals six prioritized indicators such as greenness of the site, availability of water features, degree of naturalness, type of landform, proximity to residence, and existing activities in the green spaces. These indicators were then broken down into measurable metrics for the society to rank according to their preference. The result shows that people prefer more vegetated areas, direct contact with water features, natural areas with less human interference, passive recreational activities, a mixture of different landform types, and 5–25 min walking distance from their residences. We recommend that planners, policymakers, and green area administrators in Ethiopia consider these indicators in assessing the current capacity of green spaces to deliver RES and in future recreational area development.Senait NigussieLi LiuKumelachew YeshitelaElsevierarticleGreennessAvailability of water featuresDegree of naturalnessType of landformProximity to residenceExisting activitiesEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 121, Iss , Pp 107026- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Greenness
Availability of water features
Degree of naturalness
Type of landform
Proximity to residence
Existing activities
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Greenness
Availability of water features
Degree of naturalness
Type of landform
Proximity to residence
Existing activities
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Senait Nigussie
Li Liu
Kumelachew Yeshitela
Indicator development for assessing recreational ecosystem service capacity of urban green spaces– A participatory approach
description Developing indicators to assess the capacity of green spaces to deliver recreational ecosystem service (RES) is essential but challenging because recreation is an intangible ecosystem service that is subjective among individuals. The purpose of this paper is to develop indicators for assessing the RES delivering capacity of the existing green spaces to assist green space planning in Little Akaki River catchment, located in central Ethiopia. The development of indicators follows the identification of indicators, conceptualization, calculation, communication, and ranking of indicator phases. We involved the society in identification of indicators, conceptualization, and communication phases. The result reveals six prioritized indicators such as greenness of the site, availability of water features, degree of naturalness, type of landform, proximity to residence, and existing activities in the green spaces. These indicators were then broken down into measurable metrics for the society to rank according to their preference. The result shows that people prefer more vegetated areas, direct contact with water features, natural areas with less human interference, passive recreational activities, a mixture of different landform types, and 5–25 min walking distance from their residences. We recommend that planners, policymakers, and green area administrators in Ethiopia consider these indicators in assessing the current capacity of green spaces to deliver RES and in future recreational area development.
format article
author Senait Nigussie
Li Liu
Kumelachew Yeshitela
author_facet Senait Nigussie
Li Liu
Kumelachew Yeshitela
author_sort Senait Nigussie
title Indicator development for assessing recreational ecosystem service capacity of urban green spaces– A participatory approach
title_short Indicator development for assessing recreational ecosystem service capacity of urban green spaces– A participatory approach
title_full Indicator development for assessing recreational ecosystem service capacity of urban green spaces– A participatory approach
title_fullStr Indicator development for assessing recreational ecosystem service capacity of urban green spaces– A participatory approach
title_full_unstemmed Indicator development for assessing recreational ecosystem service capacity of urban green spaces– A participatory approach
title_sort indicator development for assessing recreational ecosystem service capacity of urban green spaces– a participatory approach
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8c77a525ccf443cf9eec14160e1cedc2
work_keys_str_mv AT senaitnigussie indicatordevelopmentforassessingrecreationalecosystemservicecapacityofurbangreenspacesaparticipatoryapproach
AT liliu indicatordevelopmentforassessingrecreationalecosystemservicecapacityofurbangreenspacesaparticipatoryapproach
AT kumelachewyeshitela indicatordevelopmentforassessingrecreationalecosystemservicecapacityofurbangreenspacesaparticipatoryapproach
_version_ 1718405856596328448