Comparison of Simultaneous Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using O-arm Navigated Technique for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases

Minimally invasive posterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-PLIF/TLIF) are widely accepted procedures for lumbar instability due to degenerative or traumatic diseases. Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is currently receiving considerable attention because of the reductions in da...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ying Tan, Masato Tanaka, Sumeet Sonawane, Koji Uotani, Yoshiaki Oda, Yoshihiro Fujiwara, Shinya Arataki, Taro Yamauchi, Tomoyuki Takigawa, Yasuo Ito
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8cb34319df0245588cbc2ac33acddf6c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8cb34319df0245588cbc2ac33acddf6c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8cb34319df0245588cbc2ac33acddf6c2021-11-11T17:34:34ZComparison of Simultaneous Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using O-arm Navigated Technique for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases10.3390/jcm102149382077-0383https://doaj.org/article/8cb34319df0245588cbc2ac33acddf6c2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/21/4938https://doaj.org/toc/2077-0383Minimally invasive posterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-PLIF/TLIF) are widely accepted procedures for lumbar instability due to degenerative or traumatic diseases. Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is currently receiving considerable attention because of the reductions in damage to the back muscles and neural tissue. The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of simultaneous single-position OLIF and percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation with MI-PLIF/TLIF. This retrospective comparative study included 98 patients, comprising 63 patients with single-position OLIF (Group SO) and 35 patients with MI-PLIF/TLIF (Group P/T). Cases with more than 1 year of follow-up were included in this study. Mean follow-up was 32.9 ± 7.0 months for Group SO and 33.7 ± 7.5 months for Group P/T. Clinical and radiological evaluations were performed. Comparing Group SO to Group P/T, surgical time and blood loss were 118 versus 172 min (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and 139 versus 374 mL (<i>p</i> < 0.01), respectively. Cage height, change in disk height, and postoperative foraminal height were significantly higher in Group SO than in Group P/T. The fusion rate was 96.8% in Group SO, similar to the 94.2% in Group P/T (<i>p</i> = 0.985). The complication rate was 6.3% in Group SO and 14.1% in Group P/T (<i>p</i> = 0.191). Simultaneous single position O-arm-navigated OLIF reduces the surgical time, blood loss, and time to ambulation after surgery. Good indirect decompression can be achieved with this method.Ying TanMasato TanakaSumeet SonawaneKoji UotaniYoshiaki OdaYoshihiro FujiwaraShinya AratakiTaro YamauchiTomoyuki TakigawaYasuo ItoMDPI AGarticleO-arm navigationsimultaneous single-position oblique lateral interbody fusionindirect decompressionMedicineRENJournal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 4938, p 4938 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic O-arm navigation
simultaneous single-position oblique lateral interbody fusion
indirect decompression
Medicine
R
spellingShingle O-arm navigation
simultaneous single-position oblique lateral interbody fusion
indirect decompression
Medicine
R
Ying Tan
Masato Tanaka
Sumeet Sonawane
Koji Uotani
Yoshiaki Oda
Yoshihiro Fujiwara
Shinya Arataki
Taro Yamauchi
Tomoyuki Takigawa
Yasuo Ito
Comparison of Simultaneous Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using O-arm Navigated Technique for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases
description Minimally invasive posterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-PLIF/TLIF) are widely accepted procedures for lumbar instability due to degenerative or traumatic diseases. Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is currently receiving considerable attention because of the reductions in damage to the back muscles and neural tissue. The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of simultaneous single-position OLIF and percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation with MI-PLIF/TLIF. This retrospective comparative study included 98 patients, comprising 63 patients with single-position OLIF (Group SO) and 35 patients with MI-PLIF/TLIF (Group P/T). Cases with more than 1 year of follow-up were included in this study. Mean follow-up was 32.9 ± 7.0 months for Group SO and 33.7 ± 7.5 months for Group P/T. Clinical and radiological evaluations were performed. Comparing Group SO to Group P/T, surgical time and blood loss were 118 versus 172 min (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and 139 versus 374 mL (<i>p</i> < 0.01), respectively. Cage height, change in disk height, and postoperative foraminal height were significantly higher in Group SO than in Group P/T. The fusion rate was 96.8% in Group SO, similar to the 94.2% in Group P/T (<i>p</i> = 0.985). The complication rate was 6.3% in Group SO and 14.1% in Group P/T (<i>p</i> = 0.191). Simultaneous single position O-arm-navigated OLIF reduces the surgical time, blood loss, and time to ambulation after surgery. Good indirect decompression can be achieved with this method.
format article
author Ying Tan
Masato Tanaka
Sumeet Sonawane
Koji Uotani
Yoshiaki Oda
Yoshihiro Fujiwara
Shinya Arataki
Taro Yamauchi
Tomoyuki Takigawa
Yasuo Ito
author_facet Ying Tan
Masato Tanaka
Sumeet Sonawane
Koji Uotani
Yoshiaki Oda
Yoshihiro Fujiwara
Shinya Arataki
Taro Yamauchi
Tomoyuki Takigawa
Yasuo Ito
author_sort Ying Tan
title Comparison of Simultaneous Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using O-arm Navigated Technique for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases
title_short Comparison of Simultaneous Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using O-arm Navigated Technique for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases
title_full Comparison of Simultaneous Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using O-arm Navigated Technique for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases
title_fullStr Comparison of Simultaneous Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using O-arm Navigated Technique for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Simultaneous Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using O-arm Navigated Technique for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases
title_sort comparison of simultaneous single-position oblique lumbar interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with posterior lumbar interbody fusion using o-arm navigated technique for lumbar degenerative diseases
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8cb34319df0245588cbc2ac33acddf6c
work_keys_str_mv AT yingtan comparisonofsimultaneoussinglepositionobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationwithposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionusingoarmnavigatedtechniqueforlumbardegenerativediseases
AT masatotanaka comparisonofsimultaneoussinglepositionobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationwithposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionusingoarmnavigatedtechniqueforlumbardegenerativediseases
AT sumeetsonawane comparisonofsimultaneoussinglepositionobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationwithposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionusingoarmnavigatedtechniqueforlumbardegenerativediseases
AT kojiuotani comparisonofsimultaneoussinglepositionobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationwithposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionusingoarmnavigatedtechniqueforlumbardegenerativediseases
AT yoshiakioda comparisonofsimultaneoussinglepositionobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationwithposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionusingoarmnavigatedtechniqueforlumbardegenerativediseases
AT yoshihirofujiwara comparisonofsimultaneoussinglepositionobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationwithposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionusingoarmnavigatedtechniqueforlumbardegenerativediseases
AT shinyaarataki comparisonofsimultaneoussinglepositionobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationwithposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionusingoarmnavigatedtechniqueforlumbardegenerativediseases
AT taroyamauchi comparisonofsimultaneoussinglepositionobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationwithposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionusingoarmnavigatedtechniqueforlumbardegenerativediseases
AT tomoyukitakigawa comparisonofsimultaneoussinglepositionobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationwithposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionusingoarmnavigatedtechniqueforlumbardegenerativediseases
AT yasuoito comparisonofsimultaneoussinglepositionobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandpercutaneouspediclescrewfixationwithposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionusingoarmnavigatedtechniqueforlumbardegenerativediseases
_version_ 1718432075582799872