Los liberalismos de Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay ante el enigma peronista (1943-1955)

For a long time, Latin America has been considered a hopelessly populist land. This very essentialized and comprehensive academic and political characterizations on the continent disowns the power of anti-populist actors. This paper aims to reconstruct the behavior and speechs of some of the anti po...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ernesto Bohoslavsky
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
PT
Publicado: Centre de Recherches sur les Mondes Américains 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8cb6b2a31bac4c3bb23d30f080ed9c8f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8cb6b2a31bac4c3bb23d30f080ed9c8f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8cb6b2a31bac4c3bb23d30f080ed9c8f2021-12-02T10:31:53ZLos liberalismos de Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay ante el enigma peronista (1943-1955)1626-025210.4000/nuevomundo.68805https://doaj.org/article/8cb6b2a31bac4c3bb23d30f080ed9c8f2016-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/68805https://doaj.org/toc/1626-0252For a long time, Latin America has been considered a hopelessly populist land. This very essentialized and comprehensive academic and political characterizations on the continent disowns the power of anti-populist actors. This paper aims to reconstruct the behavior and speechs of some of the anti populist coalitions as well as those of liberal politicians in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay in the peronist scenario. This work provides some evidence on mutual perceptions and cooperation among national actors from a transnational history approach; and portrays the collective imagination and the republican, anti-fascist and in some cases, elitist political culture shared by antiperonist Argentine leaders, as well as those of the UDN in Brazil and of Batllism in Uruguay. This perspective was shaped by the denunciation and the critique on what has been reported as “populist” practices - demagogic and empty rhetoric, irresponsible public expenditure and political manipulation.Since politicians in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay have held political, personal and intellectual bonds stated in newspapers, letters and public speeches, it is easy to identify joint features and ties across frontiers. They have understood -and intervened in- the political life keeping an eye on the political situation of the neighboring country in an effort to build an anti populist South American coalition in the transition between the end of WW2 and the beginning of the Cold War.Ernesto BohoslavskyCentre de Recherches sur les Mondes AméricainsarticleLiberalismSouthern ConePopulismPeronismTransnational HistoryAnthropologyGN1-890Latin America. Spanish AmericaF1201-3799ENFRPTNuevo mundo - Mundos Nuevos (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
PT
topic Liberalism
Southern Cone
Populism
Peronism
Transnational History
Anthropology
GN1-890
Latin America. Spanish America
F1201-3799
spellingShingle Liberalism
Southern Cone
Populism
Peronism
Transnational History
Anthropology
GN1-890
Latin America. Spanish America
F1201-3799
Ernesto Bohoslavsky
Los liberalismos de Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay ante el enigma peronista (1943-1955)
description For a long time, Latin America has been considered a hopelessly populist land. This very essentialized and comprehensive academic and political characterizations on the continent disowns the power of anti-populist actors. This paper aims to reconstruct the behavior and speechs of some of the anti populist coalitions as well as those of liberal politicians in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay in the peronist scenario. This work provides some evidence on mutual perceptions and cooperation among national actors from a transnational history approach; and portrays the collective imagination and the republican, anti-fascist and in some cases, elitist political culture shared by antiperonist Argentine leaders, as well as those of the UDN in Brazil and of Batllism in Uruguay. This perspective was shaped by the denunciation and the critique on what has been reported as “populist” practices - demagogic and empty rhetoric, irresponsible public expenditure and political manipulation.Since politicians in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay have held political, personal and intellectual bonds stated in newspapers, letters and public speeches, it is easy to identify joint features and ties across frontiers. They have understood -and intervened in- the political life keeping an eye on the political situation of the neighboring country in an effort to build an anti populist South American coalition in the transition between the end of WW2 and the beginning of the Cold War.
format article
author Ernesto Bohoslavsky
author_facet Ernesto Bohoslavsky
author_sort Ernesto Bohoslavsky
title Los liberalismos de Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay ante el enigma peronista (1943-1955)
title_short Los liberalismos de Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay ante el enigma peronista (1943-1955)
title_full Los liberalismos de Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay ante el enigma peronista (1943-1955)
title_fullStr Los liberalismos de Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay ante el enigma peronista (1943-1955)
title_full_unstemmed Los liberalismos de Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay ante el enigma peronista (1943-1955)
title_sort los liberalismos de argentina, brasil y uruguay ante el enigma peronista (1943-1955)
publisher Centre de Recherches sur les Mondes Américains
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/8cb6b2a31bac4c3bb23d30f080ed9c8f
work_keys_str_mv AT ernestobohoslavsky losliberalismosdeargentinabrasilyuruguayanteelenigmaperonista19431955
_version_ 1718397124290281472