Los liberalismos de Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay ante el enigma peronista (1943-1955)
For a long time, Latin America has been considered a hopelessly populist land. This very essentialized and comprehensive academic and political characterizations on the continent disowns the power of anti-populist actors. This paper aims to reconstruct the behavior and speechs of some of the anti po...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN FR PT |
Publicado: |
Centre de Recherches sur les Mondes Américains
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/8cb6b2a31bac4c3bb23d30f080ed9c8f |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:8cb6b2a31bac4c3bb23d30f080ed9c8f |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:8cb6b2a31bac4c3bb23d30f080ed9c8f2021-12-02T10:31:53ZLos liberalismos de Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay ante el enigma peronista (1943-1955)1626-025210.4000/nuevomundo.68805https://doaj.org/article/8cb6b2a31bac4c3bb23d30f080ed9c8f2016-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/68805https://doaj.org/toc/1626-0252For a long time, Latin America has been considered a hopelessly populist land. This very essentialized and comprehensive academic and political characterizations on the continent disowns the power of anti-populist actors. This paper aims to reconstruct the behavior and speechs of some of the anti populist coalitions as well as those of liberal politicians in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay in the peronist scenario. This work provides some evidence on mutual perceptions and cooperation among national actors from a transnational history approach; and portrays the collective imagination and the republican, anti-fascist and in some cases, elitist political culture shared by antiperonist Argentine leaders, as well as those of the UDN in Brazil and of Batllism in Uruguay. This perspective was shaped by the denunciation and the critique on what has been reported as “populist” practices - demagogic and empty rhetoric, irresponsible public expenditure and political manipulation.Since politicians in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay have held political, personal and intellectual bonds stated in newspapers, letters and public speeches, it is easy to identify joint features and ties across frontiers. They have understood -and intervened in- the political life keeping an eye on the political situation of the neighboring country in an effort to build an anti populist South American coalition in the transition between the end of WW2 and the beginning of the Cold War.Ernesto BohoslavskyCentre de Recherches sur les Mondes AméricainsarticleLiberalismSouthern ConePopulismPeronismTransnational HistoryAnthropologyGN1-890Latin America. Spanish AmericaF1201-3799ENFRPTNuevo mundo - Mundos Nuevos (2016) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN FR PT |
topic |
Liberalism Southern Cone Populism Peronism Transnational History Anthropology GN1-890 Latin America. Spanish America F1201-3799 |
spellingShingle |
Liberalism Southern Cone Populism Peronism Transnational History Anthropology GN1-890 Latin America. Spanish America F1201-3799 Ernesto Bohoslavsky Los liberalismos de Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay ante el enigma peronista (1943-1955) |
description |
For a long time, Latin America has been considered a hopelessly populist land. This very essentialized and comprehensive academic and political characterizations on the continent disowns the power of anti-populist actors. This paper aims to reconstruct the behavior and speechs of some of the anti populist coalitions as well as those of liberal politicians in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay in the peronist scenario. This work provides some evidence on mutual perceptions and cooperation among national actors from a transnational history approach; and portrays the collective imagination and the republican, anti-fascist and in some cases, elitist political culture shared by antiperonist Argentine leaders, as well as those of the UDN in Brazil and of Batllism in Uruguay. This perspective was shaped by the denunciation and the critique on what has been reported as “populist” practices - demagogic and empty rhetoric, irresponsible public expenditure and political manipulation.Since politicians in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay have held political, personal and intellectual bonds stated in newspapers, letters and public speeches, it is easy to identify joint features and ties across frontiers. They have understood -and intervened in- the political life keeping an eye on the political situation of the neighboring country in an effort to build an anti populist South American coalition in the transition between the end of WW2 and the beginning of the Cold War. |
format |
article |
author |
Ernesto Bohoslavsky |
author_facet |
Ernesto Bohoslavsky |
author_sort |
Ernesto Bohoslavsky |
title |
Los liberalismos de Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay ante el enigma peronista (1943-1955) |
title_short |
Los liberalismos de Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay ante el enigma peronista (1943-1955) |
title_full |
Los liberalismos de Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay ante el enigma peronista (1943-1955) |
title_fullStr |
Los liberalismos de Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay ante el enigma peronista (1943-1955) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Los liberalismos de Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay ante el enigma peronista (1943-1955) |
title_sort |
los liberalismos de argentina, brasil y uruguay ante el enigma peronista (1943-1955) |
publisher |
Centre de Recherches sur les Mondes Américains |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/8cb6b2a31bac4c3bb23d30f080ed9c8f |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ernestobohoslavsky losliberalismosdeargentinabrasilyuruguayanteelenigmaperonista19431955 |
_version_ |
1718397124290281472 |