Implant survivorship analysis after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System®

Daniel J Cher,1 W Carlton Reckling,2 Robyn A Capobianco1 1Department of Clinical Affairs, SI-BONE, Inc., 2Department of Medical Affairs, SI-BONE, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA Introduction: Surgical revision rate is a key outcome with all permanent implants. The iFuse Implant System® is a permane...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Cher DJ, Reckling WC, Capobianco RA
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:	Medical technology R855-855.5
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/8d1b9ace4cae4871a03f39d51004c4aa
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:8d1b9ace4cae4871a03f39d51004c4aa
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:8d1b9ace4cae4871a03f39d51004c4aa2021-12-02T06:09:36ZImplant survivorship analysis after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System®1179-1470https://doaj.org/article/8d1b9ace4cae4871a03f39d51004c4aa2015-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/implant-survivorship-analysis-after-minimally-invasive-sacroiliac-join-peer-reviewed-article-MDERhttps://doaj.org/toc/1179-1470Daniel J Cher,1 W Carlton Reckling,2 Robyn A Capobianco1 1Department of Clinical Affairs, SI-BONE, Inc., 2Department of Medical Affairs, SI-BONE, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA Introduction: Surgical revision rate is a key outcome with all permanent implants. The iFuse Implant System® is a permanent implant used to perform minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion. The purpose of this study is to determine the surgical revision rate after sacroiliac joint fusion surgery with this system. Methods: Using two internal sources of information, revision surgeries were identified and linked to index surgeries. The likelihood of revision surgery was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier life table approach. Predictors of revision were explored. Results: Four-year survivorship free from implant revision was 96.46%. Revision rate did not differ by sex and was lower for age >65. In all, 24% of revisions occurred within the first 30 days after surgery; 63.5% occurred within year 1. Implant survivorship has improved annually since the device was introduced in 2009. Conclusion: The survivorship rate with this implant is high and improving; the rate is somewhat higher than total hip replacement but lower than that of lumbar spine procedures. Keywords: safety, sacroiliac joint fusion, iFuse Implant System, revisionCher DJReckling WCCapobianco RADove Medical PressarticleMedical technologyR855-855.5ENMedical Devices: Evidence and Research, Vol 2015, Iss default, Pp 485-492 (2015)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medical technology R855-855.5
spellingShingle	Medical technology R855-855.5 Cher DJ Reckling WC Capobianco RA Implant survivorship analysis after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System®
description	Daniel J Cher,1 W Carlton Reckling,2 Robyn A Capobianco1 1Department of Clinical Affairs, SI-BONE, Inc., 2Department of Medical Affairs, SI-BONE, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA Introduction: Surgical revision rate is a key outcome with all permanent implants. The iFuse Implant System® is a permanent implant used to perform minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion. The purpose of this study is to determine the surgical revision rate after sacroiliac joint fusion surgery with this system. Methods: Using two internal sources of information, revision surgeries were identified and linked to index surgeries. The likelihood of revision surgery was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier life table approach. Predictors of revision were explored. Results: Four-year survivorship free from implant revision was 96.46%. Revision rate did not differ by sex and was lower for age >65. In all, 24% of revisions occurred within the first 30 days after surgery; 63.5% occurred within year 1. Implant survivorship has improved annually since the device was introduced in 2009. Conclusion: The survivorship rate with this implant is high and improving; the rate is somewhat higher than total hip replacement but lower than that of lumbar spine procedures. Keywords: safety, sacroiliac joint fusion, iFuse Implant System, revision
format	article
author	Cher DJ Reckling WC Capobianco RA
author_facet	Cher DJ Reckling WC Capobianco RA
author_sort	Cher DJ
title	Implant survivorship analysis after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System®
title_short	Implant survivorship analysis after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System®
title_full	Implant survivorship analysis after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System®
title_fullStr	Implant survivorship analysis after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System®
title_full_unstemmed	Implant survivorship analysis after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System®
title_sort	implant survivorship analysis after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using the ifuse implant system®
publisher	Dove Medical Press
publishDate	2015
url	https://doaj.org/article/8d1b9ace4cae4871a03f39d51004c4aa
work_keys_str_mv	AT cherdj implantsurvivorshipanalysisafterminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionusingtheifuseimplantsystemreg AT recklingwc implantsurvivorshipanalysisafterminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionusingtheifuseimplantsystemreg AT capobiancora implantsurvivorshipanalysisafterminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionusingtheifuseimplantsystemreg
_version_	1718400064103120896

Implant survivorship analysis after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System&reg;

Ejemplares similares

Implant survivorship analysis after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System®