MORAL DILEMMA AS A PREDICTOR OF ACADEMIC DISHONESTY TENDENCY OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Although academic dishonesty is seen as an immoral behavior by students, it is an ongoing action. In this context, it is essential to reveal the situation that causes this behavior, although students see academic dishonesty as an immoral behavior. At this point, we encounter with the concept of mora...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esra TEKEL, Hamdi KORKMAN
Formato: article
Lenguaje:DE
EN
FR
TR
Publicado: Fırat University 2020
Materias:
H
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8d28be458b80453dbe98b304b91af825
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8d28be458b80453dbe98b304b91af825
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8d28be458b80453dbe98b304b91af8252021-11-24T09:20:35ZMORAL DILEMMA AS A PREDICTOR OF ACADEMIC DISHONESTY TENDENCY OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS2148-416310.29228/JASSS.41471https://doaj.org/article/8d28be458b80453dbe98b304b91af8252020-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jasstudies.com/index.jsp?mod=tammetin&makaleadi=02c62072-26c7-42ef-87c0-4829fa9f0065.pdf&key=41471https://doaj.org/toc/2148-4163Although academic dishonesty is seen as an immoral behavior by students, it is an ongoing action. In this context, it is essential to reveal the situation that causes this behavior, although students see academic dishonesty as an immoral behavior. At this point, we encounter with the concept of moral dilemma. Since students actually accept that academic dishonesty is wrong, however they tend to show academic dishonest behavior when they are in a moral dilemma about whether to do this behavior. The aim of this study is to determine the level of regression of ethical leadership points that reveal the types of ethics used by individuals in the ethical dilemma to the academic dishonesty scores of of university students. The study was designed in relational design and 519 students were selected by using random sampling method. Academic Dishonesty Tendency Scale which includes 22 items and four factors as (i) tendency towards cheating, (ii) dishonesty tendency at studies as homework, project, etc.–common, (iii) dishonesty tendency at research and process of write up, and (iv) dishonesty tendency towards reference was developed by Eminoğlu and Nartgün (2009) to measure the level of academic dishonesty of students and Ethical Leadership Scale which includes 23 items and three factors as (i) ethic of care, (ii) ethic of critique, and (iii) ethic of justice developed by Langlois, Lapointe, Valois and de Leeuw (2014) was used to measure the decision-making styles that students use when they are in a moral dilemma. According to the findings, there is a significant relationships between the styles used by the students who are in moral dilemma and academic dishonesty and it is found that ethical leadership is a significant predictor of academic dishonesty tendency.Esra TEKELHamdi KORKMANFırat Universityarticleethical leadershipacademic dishonestymoralitymoral dilemmauniversity studentSocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99DEENFRTRJournal of Academic Social Science Studies , Vol 13, Iss 79, Pp 41-53 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language DE
EN
FR
TR
topic ethical leadership
academic dishonesty
morality
moral dilemma
university student
Social Sciences
H
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
spellingShingle ethical leadership
academic dishonesty
morality
moral dilemma
university student
Social Sciences
H
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
Esra TEKEL
Hamdi KORKMAN
MORAL DILEMMA AS A PREDICTOR OF ACADEMIC DISHONESTY TENDENCY OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
description Although academic dishonesty is seen as an immoral behavior by students, it is an ongoing action. In this context, it is essential to reveal the situation that causes this behavior, although students see academic dishonesty as an immoral behavior. At this point, we encounter with the concept of moral dilemma. Since students actually accept that academic dishonesty is wrong, however they tend to show academic dishonest behavior when they are in a moral dilemma about whether to do this behavior. The aim of this study is to determine the level of regression of ethical leadership points that reveal the types of ethics used by individuals in the ethical dilemma to the academic dishonesty scores of of university students. The study was designed in relational design and 519 students were selected by using random sampling method. Academic Dishonesty Tendency Scale which includes 22 items and four factors as (i) tendency towards cheating, (ii) dishonesty tendency at studies as homework, project, etc.–common, (iii) dishonesty tendency at research and process of write up, and (iv) dishonesty tendency towards reference was developed by Eminoğlu and Nartgün (2009) to measure the level of academic dishonesty of students and Ethical Leadership Scale which includes 23 items and three factors as (i) ethic of care, (ii) ethic of critique, and (iii) ethic of justice developed by Langlois, Lapointe, Valois and de Leeuw (2014) was used to measure the decision-making styles that students use when they are in a moral dilemma. According to the findings, there is a significant relationships between the styles used by the students who are in moral dilemma and academic dishonesty and it is found that ethical leadership is a significant predictor of academic dishonesty tendency.
format article
author Esra TEKEL
Hamdi KORKMAN
author_facet Esra TEKEL
Hamdi KORKMAN
author_sort Esra TEKEL
title MORAL DILEMMA AS A PREDICTOR OF ACADEMIC DISHONESTY TENDENCY OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
title_short MORAL DILEMMA AS A PREDICTOR OF ACADEMIC DISHONESTY TENDENCY OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
title_full MORAL DILEMMA AS A PREDICTOR OF ACADEMIC DISHONESTY TENDENCY OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
title_fullStr MORAL DILEMMA AS A PREDICTOR OF ACADEMIC DISHONESTY TENDENCY OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
title_full_unstemmed MORAL DILEMMA AS A PREDICTOR OF ACADEMIC DISHONESTY TENDENCY OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
title_sort moral dilemma as a predictor of academic dishonesty tendency of university students
publisher Fırat University
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/8d28be458b80453dbe98b304b91af825
work_keys_str_mv AT esratekel moraldilemmaasapredictorofacademicdishonestytendencyofuniversitystudents
AT hamdikorkman moraldilemmaasapredictorofacademicdishonestytendencyofuniversitystudents
_version_ 1718415748289789952