Personality Traits Modulate the Effect of tDCS on Reading Speed of Social Sentences
In this case, 62 university students participated in the study, in which a between-subjects design was adopted. Participants were also given the behavioral approach system (BAS) and behavioral inhibition system (BIS) scales. Participants had to read a list of 60 sentences with interpersonal and neut...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/8d32e4294cbe418c95a3bb0527c4e73c |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:8d32e4294cbe418c95a3bb0527c4e73c |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:8d32e4294cbe418c95a3bb0527c4e73c2021-11-25T16:57:53ZPersonality Traits Modulate the Effect of tDCS on Reading Speed of Social Sentences10.3390/brainsci111114642076-3425https://doaj.org/article/8d32e4294cbe418c95a3bb0527c4e73c2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/11/1464https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3425In this case, 62 university students participated in the study, in which a between-subjects design was adopted. Participants were also given the behavioral approach system (BAS) and behavioral inhibition system (BIS) scales. Participants had to read a list of 60 sentences with interpersonal and neutral content: 20 approach (“Pedro accepted Rosa in Whatsapp”), 20 avoidance (“Pedro Blocked Rosa in Whatsapp”) and 20 neutral (“Marta thought about the causes of the problem”). After reading them, they were subjected to 20 min of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in one of the two conditions: anodal (31) or sham (31). After tDCS, they had to read other list of 60 sentences matched in approach, avoidance and neutral contents with the former list. We found significant improvement in reading speed after anodal stimulation for social and neutral sentences. Regarding affective traits, we found that anodal stimulation benefitted reading speed in low-BIS and low-BAS participants and had no effect in either high BAS or high BIS participants. In addition, tDCS improvement in reading speed was significantly lower in avoidance sentences in low-BIS (avoidance) participants. We discuss these results at the light of previous research and highlight the importance of approach and avoidance traits as moderators of tDCS effects.Cristian ReyesIván PadrónSara Nila YagualHipólito MarreroMDPI AGarticleapproach/avoidance intentionalityrelationship action-sentencestDCSreadingsuperior temporal sulcusNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571ENBrain Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 1464, p 1464 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
approach/avoidance intentionality relationship action-sentences tDCS reading superior temporal sulcus Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571 |
spellingShingle |
approach/avoidance intentionality relationship action-sentences tDCS reading superior temporal sulcus Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571 Cristian Reyes Iván Padrón Sara Nila Yagual Hipólito Marrero Personality Traits Modulate the Effect of tDCS on Reading Speed of Social Sentences |
description |
In this case, 62 university students participated in the study, in which a between-subjects design was adopted. Participants were also given the behavioral approach system (BAS) and behavioral inhibition system (BIS) scales. Participants had to read a list of 60 sentences with interpersonal and neutral content: 20 approach (“Pedro accepted Rosa in Whatsapp”), 20 avoidance (“Pedro Blocked Rosa in Whatsapp”) and 20 neutral (“Marta thought about the causes of the problem”). After reading them, they were subjected to 20 min of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in one of the two conditions: anodal (31) or sham (31). After tDCS, they had to read other list of 60 sentences matched in approach, avoidance and neutral contents with the former list. We found significant improvement in reading speed after anodal stimulation for social and neutral sentences. Regarding affective traits, we found that anodal stimulation benefitted reading speed in low-BIS and low-BAS participants and had no effect in either high BAS or high BIS participants. In addition, tDCS improvement in reading speed was significantly lower in avoidance sentences in low-BIS (avoidance) participants. We discuss these results at the light of previous research and highlight the importance of approach and avoidance traits as moderators of tDCS effects. |
format |
article |
author |
Cristian Reyes Iván Padrón Sara Nila Yagual Hipólito Marrero |
author_facet |
Cristian Reyes Iván Padrón Sara Nila Yagual Hipólito Marrero |
author_sort |
Cristian Reyes |
title |
Personality Traits Modulate the Effect of tDCS on Reading Speed of Social Sentences |
title_short |
Personality Traits Modulate the Effect of tDCS on Reading Speed of Social Sentences |
title_full |
Personality Traits Modulate the Effect of tDCS on Reading Speed of Social Sentences |
title_fullStr |
Personality Traits Modulate the Effect of tDCS on Reading Speed of Social Sentences |
title_full_unstemmed |
Personality Traits Modulate the Effect of tDCS on Reading Speed of Social Sentences |
title_sort |
personality traits modulate the effect of tdcs on reading speed of social sentences |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/8d32e4294cbe418c95a3bb0527c4e73c |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cristianreyes personalitytraitsmodulatetheeffectoftdcsonreadingspeedofsocialsentences AT ivanpadron personalitytraitsmodulatetheeffectoftdcsonreadingspeedofsocialsentences AT saranilayagual personalitytraitsmodulatetheeffectoftdcsonreadingspeedofsocialsentences AT hipolitomarrero personalitytraitsmodulatetheeffectoftdcsonreadingspeedofsocialsentences |
_version_ |
1718412849672355840 |