Cardiogenic Shock: Protocols, Teams, Centers, and Networks
The mortality of cardiogenic shock (CS) remains unacceptably high. Delays in the recognition of CS and access to disease-modifying or hemodynamically stabilizing interventions likely contribute to poor outcomes. In parallel to successful initiatives in other disease states, such as acute ST-elevatio...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Radcliffe Medical Media
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/8d57eed4939f4817b93ffd92df9fdc44 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:8d57eed4939f4817b93ffd92df9fdc44 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:8d57eed4939f4817b93ffd92df9fdc442021-12-04T16:05:05ZCardiogenic Shock: Protocols, Teams, Centers, and Networks10.15420/usc.2021.101758-390X1758-3896https://doaj.org/article/8d57eed4939f4817b93ffd92df9fdc442021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.uscjournal.com/articleindex/usc.2021.10https://doaj.org/toc/1758-3896https://doaj.org/toc/1758-390XThe mortality of cardiogenic shock (CS) remains unacceptably high. Delays in the recognition of CS and access to disease-modifying or hemodynamically stabilizing interventions likely contribute to poor outcomes. In parallel to successful initiatives in other disease states, such as acute ST-elevation MI and major trauma, institutions are increasingly advocating the use of a multidisciplinary ‘shock team’ approach to CS management. A volume–outcome relationship exists in CS, as with many other acute cardiovascular conditions, and the emergence of ‘shock hubs’ as experienced facilities with an interest in improving CS outcomes through a hub-and-spoke ‘shock network’ approach provides another opportunity to deliver improved CS care as widely and equitably as possible. This narrative review outlines improvements from a networked approach to care, discusses a team-based and protocolized approach to CS management, reviews the available evidence and discusses the potential benefits, challenges, and opportunities of such systems of care.Alex F WarrenCarolyn RosnerRaghav GattaniAlex G TruesdellAlastair G ProudfootRadcliffe Medical MediaarticleDiseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) systemRC666-701ENUS Cardiology Review , Vol 15, Iss , Pp - (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system RC666-701 |
spellingShingle |
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system RC666-701 Alex F Warren Carolyn Rosner Raghav Gattani Alex G Truesdell Alastair G Proudfoot Cardiogenic Shock: Protocols, Teams, Centers, and Networks |
description |
The mortality of cardiogenic shock (CS) remains unacceptably high. Delays in the recognition of CS and access to disease-modifying or hemodynamically stabilizing interventions likely contribute to poor outcomes. In parallel to successful initiatives in other disease states, such as acute ST-elevation MI and major trauma, institutions are increasingly advocating the use of a multidisciplinary ‘shock team’ approach to CS management. A volume–outcome relationship exists in CS, as with many other acute cardiovascular conditions, and the emergence of ‘shock hubs’ as experienced facilities with an interest in improving CS outcomes through a hub-and-spoke ‘shock network’ approach provides another opportunity to deliver improved CS care as widely and equitably as possible. This narrative review outlines improvements from a networked approach to care, discusses a team-based and protocolized approach to CS management, reviews the available evidence and discusses the potential benefits, challenges, and opportunities of such systems of care. |
format |
article |
author |
Alex F Warren Carolyn Rosner Raghav Gattani Alex G Truesdell Alastair G Proudfoot |
author_facet |
Alex F Warren Carolyn Rosner Raghav Gattani Alex G Truesdell Alastair G Proudfoot |
author_sort |
Alex F Warren |
title |
Cardiogenic Shock: Protocols, Teams, Centers, and Networks |
title_short |
Cardiogenic Shock: Protocols, Teams, Centers, and Networks |
title_full |
Cardiogenic Shock: Protocols, Teams, Centers, and Networks |
title_fullStr |
Cardiogenic Shock: Protocols, Teams, Centers, and Networks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cardiogenic Shock: Protocols, Teams, Centers, and Networks |
title_sort |
cardiogenic shock: protocols, teams, centers, and networks |
publisher |
Radcliffe Medical Media |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/8d57eed4939f4817b93ffd92df9fdc44 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alexfwarren cardiogenicshockprotocolsteamscentersandnetworks AT carolynrosner cardiogenicshockprotocolsteamscentersandnetworks AT raghavgattani cardiogenicshockprotocolsteamscentersandnetworks AT alexgtruesdell cardiogenicshockprotocolsteamscentersandnetworks AT alastairgproudfoot cardiogenicshockprotocolsteamscentersandnetworks |
_version_ |
1718372686073167872 |