Cardiogenic Shock: Protocols, Teams, Centers, and Networks
The mortality of cardiogenic shock (CS) remains unacceptably high. Delays in the recognition of CS and access to disease-modifying or hemodynamically stabilizing interventions likely contribute to poor outcomes. In parallel to successful initiatives in other disease states, such as acute ST-elevatio...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Alex F Warren, Carolyn Rosner, Raghav Gattani, Alex G Truesdell, Alastair G Proudfoot |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Radcliffe Medical Media
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/8d57eed4939f4817b93ffd92df9fdc44 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
The Contemporary Cardiogenic Shock ‘Playbook’
por: Alexander G Truesdell
Publicado: (2021) -
Extracorporeal Life Support for Cardiac Arrest and Cardiogenic Shock
por: Andrea Elliott, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Multivalve dysfunction and cardiogenic shock linked to scurvy: A case report
por: Lisa Conte, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Editorial: Cardiogenic Shock: Basic and Clinical Considerations
por: Deepak Acharya, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction in COVID pandemic – Clinical characteristics, management and outcomes
por: Yash Paul Sharma, et al.
Publicado: (2021)