Photorefractive keratectomy in patients with mild to moderate stable keratoconus: a five-year prospective follow-up study

Elias Chelala,1 Hala El Rami,1 Ali Dirani,1 Ali Fadlallah,1 Omar Fakhoury,1 Elias Warrak2 1Saint-Joseph University, Faculty of Medicine, 2Clemenceau Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the visual outcome of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in patien...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chelala E, Rami HE, Dirani A, Fadlallah A, Fakhoury O, Warrak E
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8d99c600480447d3a2f0ad3dfadb9387
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Elias Chelala,1 Hala El Rami,1 Ali Dirani,1 Ali Fadlallah,1 Omar Fakhoury,1 Elias Warrak2 1Saint-Joseph University, Faculty of Medicine, 2Clemenceau Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the visual outcome of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in patients with mild to moderate stable keratoconus and to assess the risk of progression of the disease after the excimer laser procedure. Methods: In this prospective study, carried out at the Clemenceau Medical Center, an affiliate of Johns Hopkins International, in Beirut, Lebanon, 119 eyes from 72 patients with grade 1&ndash;2 keratoconus (Amsler&ndash;Krumeich classification) underwent PRK. Forty-seven patients had both eyes treated and 25 patients had one eye treated. The procedure was done using the Wavelight Eye Q Excimer laser. Uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity, corneal topography, and pachymetry were assessed before the procedure and 3, 6, 12, 36, and 60 months after the procedure. Results: Mean uncorrected visual acuity showed a statistically significant improvement (P < 0.05) at one, 3, and 5 years follow-up. One hundred and seventeen eyes (98.3%) showed no progression while two eyes (1.7%) showed progression of the disease at 5 years follow-up, as documented by corneal topography and pachymetry. These two eyes were treated with corneal collagen crosslinking. Conclusion: PRK in mild to moderate keratoconus is a safe and effective procedure for improving uncorrected vision in patients with mild refractive errors. However, close follow-up of patients is needed to detect any progression of the disease. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the overall effect of this procedure on progression of the disease. Keywords: stable keratoconus, photorefractive keratectomy