Evaluation of DNA extraction protocols from liquid-based cytology specimens for studying cervical microbiota.
Cervical microbiota (CM) are considered an important factor affecting the progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and are implicated in the persistence of human papillomavirus (HPV). Collection of liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples is routine for cervical cancer screening and HPV ge...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/8da7e7d4cc0c43eeae15c1d015d198d7 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:8da7e7d4cc0c43eeae15c1d015d198d7 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:8da7e7d4cc0c43eeae15c1d015d198d72021-12-02T20:14:53ZEvaluation of DNA extraction protocols from liquid-based cytology specimens for studying cervical microbiota.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0237556https://doaj.org/article/8da7e7d4cc0c43eeae15c1d015d198d72021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237556https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Cervical microbiota (CM) are considered an important factor affecting the progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and are implicated in the persistence of human papillomavirus (HPV). Collection of liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples is routine for cervical cancer screening and HPV genotyping and can be used for long-term cytological biobanking. We sought to determine whether it is possible to access microbial DNA from LBC specimens, and compared the performance of four different extraction protocols: (ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep Kit; QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit; QIAamp DNA Mini Kit; and IndiSpin Pathogen Kit) and their ability to capture the diversity of CM from LBC specimens. LBC specimens from 20 patients (stored for 716 ± 105 days) with CIN values of 2 or 3 were each aliquoted for each of the four kits. Loss of microbial diversity due to long-term LBC storage could not be assessed due to lack of fresh LBC samples. Comparisons with other types of cervical sampling were not performed. We observed that all DNA extraction kits provided equivalent accessibility to the cervical microbial DNA within stored LBC samples. Approximately 80% microbial genera were shared among all DNA extraction protocols. Potential kit contaminants were observed as well. Variation between individuals was a significantly greater influence on the observed microbial composition than was the method of DNA extraction. We also observed that HPV16 was significantly associated with community types that were not dominated by Lactobacillus iners.Takeo ShibataMayumi NakagawaHannah N ColemanSarah M OwensWilliam W GreenfieldToshiyuki SasagawaMichael S RobesonPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 8, p e0237556 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Takeo Shibata Mayumi Nakagawa Hannah N Coleman Sarah M Owens William W Greenfield Toshiyuki Sasagawa Michael S Robeson Evaluation of DNA extraction protocols from liquid-based cytology specimens for studying cervical microbiota. |
description |
Cervical microbiota (CM) are considered an important factor affecting the progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and are implicated in the persistence of human papillomavirus (HPV). Collection of liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples is routine for cervical cancer screening and HPV genotyping and can be used for long-term cytological biobanking. We sought to determine whether it is possible to access microbial DNA from LBC specimens, and compared the performance of four different extraction protocols: (ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep Kit; QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit; QIAamp DNA Mini Kit; and IndiSpin Pathogen Kit) and their ability to capture the diversity of CM from LBC specimens. LBC specimens from 20 patients (stored for 716 ± 105 days) with CIN values of 2 or 3 were each aliquoted for each of the four kits. Loss of microbial diversity due to long-term LBC storage could not be assessed due to lack of fresh LBC samples. Comparisons with other types of cervical sampling were not performed. We observed that all DNA extraction kits provided equivalent accessibility to the cervical microbial DNA within stored LBC samples. Approximately 80% microbial genera were shared among all DNA extraction protocols. Potential kit contaminants were observed as well. Variation between individuals was a significantly greater influence on the observed microbial composition than was the method of DNA extraction. We also observed that HPV16 was significantly associated with community types that were not dominated by Lactobacillus iners. |
format |
article |
author |
Takeo Shibata Mayumi Nakagawa Hannah N Coleman Sarah M Owens William W Greenfield Toshiyuki Sasagawa Michael S Robeson |
author_facet |
Takeo Shibata Mayumi Nakagawa Hannah N Coleman Sarah M Owens William W Greenfield Toshiyuki Sasagawa Michael S Robeson |
author_sort |
Takeo Shibata |
title |
Evaluation of DNA extraction protocols from liquid-based cytology specimens for studying cervical microbiota. |
title_short |
Evaluation of DNA extraction protocols from liquid-based cytology specimens for studying cervical microbiota. |
title_full |
Evaluation of DNA extraction protocols from liquid-based cytology specimens for studying cervical microbiota. |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of DNA extraction protocols from liquid-based cytology specimens for studying cervical microbiota. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of DNA extraction protocols from liquid-based cytology specimens for studying cervical microbiota. |
title_sort |
evaluation of dna extraction protocols from liquid-based cytology specimens for studying cervical microbiota. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/8da7e7d4cc0c43eeae15c1d015d198d7 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT takeoshibata evaluationofdnaextractionprotocolsfromliquidbasedcytologyspecimensforstudyingcervicalmicrobiota AT mayuminakagawa evaluationofdnaextractionprotocolsfromliquidbasedcytologyspecimensforstudyingcervicalmicrobiota AT hannahncoleman evaluationofdnaextractionprotocolsfromliquidbasedcytologyspecimensforstudyingcervicalmicrobiota AT sarahmowens evaluationofdnaextractionprotocolsfromliquidbasedcytologyspecimensforstudyingcervicalmicrobiota AT williamwgreenfield evaluationofdnaextractionprotocolsfromliquidbasedcytologyspecimensforstudyingcervicalmicrobiota AT toshiyukisasagawa evaluationofdnaextractionprotocolsfromliquidbasedcytologyspecimensforstudyingcervicalmicrobiota AT michaelsrobeson evaluationofdnaextractionprotocolsfromliquidbasedcytologyspecimensforstudyingcervicalmicrobiota |
_version_ |
1718374658746613760 |