Evaluation of DNA extraction protocols from liquid-based cytology specimens for studying cervical microbiota.

Cervical microbiota (CM) are considered an important factor affecting the progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and are implicated in the persistence of human papillomavirus (HPV). Collection of liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples is routine for cervical cancer screening and HPV ge...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takeo Shibata, Mayumi Nakagawa, Hannah N Coleman, Sarah M Owens, William W Greenfield, Toshiyuki Sasagawa, Michael S Robeson
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8da7e7d4cc0c43eeae15c1d015d198d7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8da7e7d4cc0c43eeae15c1d015d198d7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8da7e7d4cc0c43eeae15c1d015d198d72021-12-02T20:14:53ZEvaluation of DNA extraction protocols from liquid-based cytology specimens for studying cervical microbiota.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0237556https://doaj.org/article/8da7e7d4cc0c43eeae15c1d015d198d72021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237556https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Cervical microbiota (CM) are considered an important factor affecting the progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and are implicated in the persistence of human papillomavirus (HPV). Collection of liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples is routine for cervical cancer screening and HPV genotyping and can be used for long-term cytological biobanking. We sought to determine whether it is possible to access microbial DNA from LBC specimens, and compared the performance of four different extraction protocols: (ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep Kit; QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit; QIAamp DNA Mini Kit; and IndiSpin Pathogen Kit) and their ability to capture the diversity of CM from LBC specimens. LBC specimens from 20 patients (stored for 716 ± 105 days) with CIN values of 2 or 3 were each aliquoted for each of the four kits. Loss of microbial diversity due to long-term LBC storage could not be assessed due to lack of fresh LBC samples. Comparisons with other types of cervical sampling were not performed. We observed that all DNA extraction kits provided equivalent accessibility to the cervical microbial DNA within stored LBC samples. Approximately 80% microbial genera were shared among all DNA extraction protocols. Potential kit contaminants were observed as well. Variation between individuals was a significantly greater influence on the observed microbial composition than was the method of DNA extraction. We also observed that HPV16 was significantly associated with community types that were not dominated by Lactobacillus iners.Takeo ShibataMayumi NakagawaHannah N ColemanSarah M OwensWilliam W GreenfieldToshiyuki SasagawaMichael S RobesonPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 8, p e0237556 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Takeo Shibata
Mayumi Nakagawa
Hannah N Coleman
Sarah M Owens
William W Greenfield
Toshiyuki Sasagawa
Michael S Robeson
Evaluation of DNA extraction protocols from liquid-based cytology specimens for studying cervical microbiota.
description Cervical microbiota (CM) are considered an important factor affecting the progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and are implicated in the persistence of human papillomavirus (HPV). Collection of liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples is routine for cervical cancer screening and HPV genotyping and can be used for long-term cytological biobanking. We sought to determine whether it is possible to access microbial DNA from LBC specimens, and compared the performance of four different extraction protocols: (ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep Kit; QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit; QIAamp DNA Mini Kit; and IndiSpin Pathogen Kit) and their ability to capture the diversity of CM from LBC specimens. LBC specimens from 20 patients (stored for 716 ± 105 days) with CIN values of 2 or 3 were each aliquoted for each of the four kits. Loss of microbial diversity due to long-term LBC storage could not be assessed due to lack of fresh LBC samples. Comparisons with other types of cervical sampling were not performed. We observed that all DNA extraction kits provided equivalent accessibility to the cervical microbial DNA within stored LBC samples. Approximately 80% microbial genera were shared among all DNA extraction protocols. Potential kit contaminants were observed as well. Variation between individuals was a significantly greater influence on the observed microbial composition than was the method of DNA extraction. We also observed that HPV16 was significantly associated with community types that were not dominated by Lactobacillus iners.
format article
author Takeo Shibata
Mayumi Nakagawa
Hannah N Coleman
Sarah M Owens
William W Greenfield
Toshiyuki Sasagawa
Michael S Robeson
author_facet Takeo Shibata
Mayumi Nakagawa
Hannah N Coleman
Sarah M Owens
William W Greenfield
Toshiyuki Sasagawa
Michael S Robeson
author_sort Takeo Shibata
title Evaluation of DNA extraction protocols from liquid-based cytology specimens for studying cervical microbiota.
title_short Evaluation of DNA extraction protocols from liquid-based cytology specimens for studying cervical microbiota.
title_full Evaluation of DNA extraction protocols from liquid-based cytology specimens for studying cervical microbiota.
title_fullStr Evaluation of DNA extraction protocols from liquid-based cytology specimens for studying cervical microbiota.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of DNA extraction protocols from liquid-based cytology specimens for studying cervical microbiota.
title_sort evaluation of dna extraction protocols from liquid-based cytology specimens for studying cervical microbiota.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8da7e7d4cc0c43eeae15c1d015d198d7
work_keys_str_mv AT takeoshibata evaluationofdnaextractionprotocolsfromliquidbasedcytologyspecimensforstudyingcervicalmicrobiota
AT mayuminakagawa evaluationofdnaextractionprotocolsfromliquidbasedcytologyspecimensforstudyingcervicalmicrobiota
AT hannahncoleman evaluationofdnaextractionprotocolsfromliquidbasedcytologyspecimensforstudyingcervicalmicrobiota
AT sarahmowens evaluationofdnaextractionprotocolsfromliquidbasedcytologyspecimensforstudyingcervicalmicrobiota
AT williamwgreenfield evaluationofdnaextractionprotocolsfromliquidbasedcytologyspecimensforstudyingcervicalmicrobiota
AT toshiyukisasagawa evaluationofdnaextractionprotocolsfromliquidbasedcytologyspecimensforstudyingcervicalmicrobiota
AT michaelsrobeson evaluationofdnaextractionprotocolsfromliquidbasedcytologyspecimensforstudyingcervicalmicrobiota
_version_ 1718374658746613760