Corneal endothelium and central corneal thickness changes in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Amira El-Agamy,1,2,* Shams Alsubaie3,* 1Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 2Mansoura Ophthalmic Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt; 3Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El-Agamy A, Alsubaie S
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8da8a18f74cb4993b03853b4a6bf196f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Amira El-Agamy,1,2,* Shams Alsubaie3,* 1Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 2Mansoura Ophthalmic Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt; 3Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia *These authors contributed equally to this work Purpose: This study was conducted to compare the corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), morphological features, and central corneal thickness (CCT) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) with age-matched, nondiabetic control subjects using EM-3000 Specular Microscope. Study design: This was a prospective, hospital-based, nonrandomized, case–control, observational, and quantitative study. Subjects and methods: The study included 57 patients (57 eyes) with type 2 DM and 45 control (nondiabetic) subjects (45 eyes). The corneal endothelial structure and CCT were examined in all eyes by noncontact specular microscopy using EM-3000 Specular Microscope. The endothelial structure was studied for ECD, coefficient of variation of cell area (CV), and percentage of hexagonal cells. Results: The study included 36 eyes without diabetic retinopathy (DR), 14 eyes with nonproliferative DR, and 7 eyes with proliferative DR. There were 26 eyes with a duration of ≤10 years and 31 eyes with a duration of >10 years. Also, there were 24 eyes with HbA1c ≤7.5% and 33 eyes with HbA1c >7.5%. ECD was significantly lower in the diabetic cornea than in control group (P=0.014). CV was higher in diabetic cornea (P=0.008). The diabetic cornea group had lower percentage of hexagonal cells than the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.603). Also, diabetic cornea was thicker than control group, but not statistically significant (P=0.301). Conclusion: This study documented that type 2 DM causes a significant reduction of ECD and increased CV (polymegathism). Also, diabetic cornea has increased CCT and lower percentage of hexagonal cells than normal subjects, but without statistical significance. Keywords: endothelial cell density, central corneal thickness, diabetes mellitus, diabetic retinopathy, noncontact specular microscopy