Loss Aversion as a Potential Factor in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy

The sunk-cost fallacy (SCF) occurs when an individual makes an investment with a low probability of a payoff because an earlier investment was made. The investments may be time, effort, or money. Previous researchers showed that larger prior investments were more likely to lead to the SCF than lowe...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veronika Tait, Harold L. Miller
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
ES
Publicado: Universidad de San Buenaventura 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8da9580e6c5043ba806559f8a81780df
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8da9580e6c5043ba806559f8a81780df
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8da9580e6c5043ba806559f8a81780df2021-11-25T02:21:37ZLoss Aversion as a Potential Factor in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy10.21500/20112084.39512011-20842011-7922https://doaj.org/article/8da9580e6c5043ba806559f8a81780df2019-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/3951https://doaj.org/toc/2011-2084https://doaj.org/toc/2011-7922 The sunk-cost fallacy (SCF) occurs when an individual makes an investment with a low probability of a payoff because an earlier investment was made. The investments may be time, effort, or money. Previous researchers showed that larger prior investments were more likely to lead to the SCF than lower investments were, though little research has been focused on comparing investment types. There are several theories of the SCF, but few have implicated loss aversion, the higher sensitivity to losses than to gains, as a potential factor. We studied the differential effects of investment amount and type on the occurrence of the SCF and explored loss aversion as a potential explanation of these differences. There were 168 participants, who completed a sunk-cost task as well as an endowment-effect task, which was a measure of loss aversion. A 3×3 mixed-design ANCOVA was used in which the SCF score was the dependent variable and loss-aversion scores were used as a covariate. The SCF occurred most often with money, less with time, and least with effort. Loss aversion displayed a weak negative relation to the SCF. Veronika TaitHarold L. MillerUniversidad de San Buenaventuraarticlesunk-cost fallacyloss aversionmoneytimeeffortPsychologyBF1-990ENESInternational Journal of Psychological Research, Vol 12, Iss 2 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
ES
topic sunk-cost fallacy
loss aversion
money
time
effort
Psychology
BF1-990
spellingShingle sunk-cost fallacy
loss aversion
money
time
effort
Psychology
BF1-990
Veronika Tait
Harold L. Miller
Loss Aversion as a Potential Factor in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy
description The sunk-cost fallacy (SCF) occurs when an individual makes an investment with a low probability of a payoff because an earlier investment was made. The investments may be time, effort, or money. Previous researchers showed that larger prior investments were more likely to lead to the SCF than lower investments were, though little research has been focused on comparing investment types. There are several theories of the SCF, but few have implicated loss aversion, the higher sensitivity to losses than to gains, as a potential factor. We studied the differential effects of investment amount and type on the occurrence of the SCF and explored loss aversion as a potential explanation of these differences. There were 168 participants, who completed a sunk-cost task as well as an endowment-effect task, which was a measure of loss aversion. A 3×3 mixed-design ANCOVA was used in which the SCF score was the dependent variable and loss-aversion scores were used as a covariate. The SCF occurred most often with money, less with time, and least with effort. Loss aversion displayed a weak negative relation to the SCF.
format article
author Veronika Tait
Harold L. Miller
author_facet Veronika Tait
Harold L. Miller
author_sort Veronika Tait
title Loss Aversion as a Potential Factor in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy
title_short Loss Aversion as a Potential Factor in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy
title_full Loss Aversion as a Potential Factor in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy
title_fullStr Loss Aversion as a Potential Factor in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy
title_full_unstemmed Loss Aversion as a Potential Factor in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy
title_sort loss aversion as a potential factor in the sunk-cost fallacy
publisher Universidad de San Buenaventura
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/8da9580e6c5043ba806559f8a81780df
work_keys_str_mv AT veronikatait lossaversionasapotentialfactorinthesunkcostfallacy
AT haroldlmiller lossaversionasapotentialfactorinthesunkcostfallacy
_version_ 1718414705996857344