On Covidiots and Covexperts: Stupidity and the Politics of Health

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the significance of the politics of health as an ongoing interpretative event. The effectiveness of delivering prevention strategies is in negotiation with day-to-day arguments in the public sphere, not just by “experts” in peer-reviewed papers, but also in the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Tom Grimwood
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: University of Calgary 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8e08a25f16de45b28f50273f5391c4ad
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8e08a25f16de45b28f50273f5391c4ad
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8e08a25f16de45b28f50273f5391c4ad2021-11-25T21:18:53ZOn Covidiots and Covexperts: Stupidity and the Politics of Health10.11575/jah.v2021i2021.725381927-4416https://doaj.org/article/8e08a25f16de45b28f50273f5391c4ad2021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/jah/article/view/72538https://doaj.org/toc/1927-4416 The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the significance of the politics of health as an ongoing interpretative event. The effectiveness of delivering prevention strategies is in negotiation with day-to-day arguments in the public sphere, not just by “experts” in peer-reviewed papers, but also in the everyday interpretations and discussions of available expertise on print and digital media platforms. In this paper I explore ae particular facet of these public debate over the politics of health: the deployment of the commonplace of stupidity. I argue that the growth of this commonplace within discussion is rooted in particular models of interpretation which limit self-understanding, by over-emphasising certain points of significance within the interpretative horizon over more banal (and “stupid”) aspects that are, nevertheless, influential on health interventions. Tom GrimwoodUniversity of CalgaryarticlePhilosophy (General)B1-5802ENJournal of Applied Hermeneutics, Vol 2021, Iss 2021 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Philosophy (General)
B1-5802
spellingShingle Philosophy (General)
B1-5802
Tom Grimwood
On Covidiots and Covexperts: Stupidity and the Politics of Health
description The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the significance of the politics of health as an ongoing interpretative event. The effectiveness of delivering prevention strategies is in negotiation with day-to-day arguments in the public sphere, not just by “experts” in peer-reviewed papers, but also in the everyday interpretations and discussions of available expertise on print and digital media platforms. In this paper I explore ae particular facet of these public debate over the politics of health: the deployment of the commonplace of stupidity. I argue that the growth of this commonplace within discussion is rooted in particular models of interpretation which limit self-understanding, by over-emphasising certain points of significance within the interpretative horizon over more banal (and “stupid”) aspects that are, nevertheless, influential on health interventions.
format article
author Tom Grimwood
author_facet Tom Grimwood
author_sort Tom Grimwood
title On Covidiots and Covexperts: Stupidity and the Politics of Health
title_short On Covidiots and Covexperts: Stupidity and the Politics of Health
title_full On Covidiots and Covexperts: Stupidity and the Politics of Health
title_fullStr On Covidiots and Covexperts: Stupidity and the Politics of Health
title_full_unstemmed On Covidiots and Covexperts: Stupidity and the Politics of Health
title_sort on covidiots and covexperts: stupidity and the politics of health
publisher University of Calgary
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8e08a25f16de45b28f50273f5391c4ad
work_keys_str_mv AT tomgrimwood oncovidiotsandcovexpertsstupidityandthepoliticsofhealth
_version_ 1718410045225435136