Sustainability Identification of Steel and Concrete Construction Frames with Respect to Triple Bottom Line

As one of the most prominent industries in developed and developing countries, the construction industry has had substantial impacts on different aspects of the environment, society, and economy. In recent years, sustainable construction has been introduced as an approach to evaluate the various con...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amir Oladazimi, Saeed Mansour, Seyed Abbas Hosseinijou, Mohammad H. Majdfaghihi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
LCA
LCC
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8e41eba99a264c8886bc885a6ae9e52e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8e41eba99a264c8886bc885a6ae9e52e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8e41eba99a264c8886bc885a6ae9e52e2021-11-25T17:00:50ZSustainability Identification of Steel and Concrete Construction Frames with Respect to Triple Bottom Line10.3390/buildings111105652075-5309https://doaj.org/article/8e41eba99a264c8886bc885a6ae9e52e2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/11/11/565https://doaj.org/toc/2075-5309As one of the most prominent industries in developed and developing countries, the construction industry has had substantial impacts on different aspects of the environment, society, and economy. In recent years, sustainable construction has been introduced as an approach to evaluate the various construction phases based on environmental, economic, and social dimensions, also known as the triple bottom line (TBL). To conduct a sustainability analysis of the buildings in Tehran, the capital city of Iran, two conventional construction frames were selected, namely steel frame and concrete frame. In this research, three conventional approaches for the evaluation of the TBL, namely the life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost (LCC), and social life cycle assessment (SLCA), were, respectively, used for the study of environmental, economic, and social impacts. The main results of the study are summarized as the following: Overall, based on the LCA results, the concrete frame led to almost 38% more environmental pollution than steel frame. In terms of the total prices of the buildings, considering their LCC and with respect to the present value (PV) method, the steel frame was almost 152,000 USD more expensive than the concrete frame. The quantified results of the social dimension by the SLCA method showed that concrete and steel buildings had a score of 0.199 and 0.189, respectively, which indicates that concrete had a slightly better social performance based on expert opinions. A multi-criteria assessment and sensitivity analysis of the results were conducted by a graphical tool, namely the mixing triangle, and showed that the overall preference of each alternative depends mainly on the importance weights given to each aspect of the assessment. However, one of the main findings of the research was that overall, giving a high importance weight to environmental dimension leads to sustainability preference of steel over concrete frame, while giving high importance weights to economic or social dimensions leads to sustainability preference of concrete over steel frame. Findings of the study are beneficial to decision-makers in the construction industry since they can decide on the best alternative among concrete and steel frames based on their strategies.Amir OladazimiSaeed MansourSeyed Abbas HosseinijouMohammad H. MajdfaghihiMDPI AGarticlesustainable buildingconcrete framesteel frametriple bottom lineLCALCCBuilding constructionTH1-9745ENBuildings, Vol 11, Iss 565, p 565 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic sustainable building
concrete frame
steel frame
triple bottom line
LCA
LCC
Building construction
TH1-9745
spellingShingle sustainable building
concrete frame
steel frame
triple bottom line
LCA
LCC
Building construction
TH1-9745
Amir Oladazimi
Saeed Mansour
Seyed Abbas Hosseinijou
Mohammad H. Majdfaghihi
Sustainability Identification of Steel and Concrete Construction Frames with Respect to Triple Bottom Line
description As one of the most prominent industries in developed and developing countries, the construction industry has had substantial impacts on different aspects of the environment, society, and economy. In recent years, sustainable construction has been introduced as an approach to evaluate the various construction phases based on environmental, economic, and social dimensions, also known as the triple bottom line (TBL). To conduct a sustainability analysis of the buildings in Tehran, the capital city of Iran, two conventional construction frames were selected, namely steel frame and concrete frame. In this research, three conventional approaches for the evaluation of the TBL, namely the life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost (LCC), and social life cycle assessment (SLCA), were, respectively, used for the study of environmental, economic, and social impacts. The main results of the study are summarized as the following: Overall, based on the LCA results, the concrete frame led to almost 38% more environmental pollution than steel frame. In terms of the total prices of the buildings, considering their LCC and with respect to the present value (PV) method, the steel frame was almost 152,000 USD more expensive than the concrete frame. The quantified results of the social dimension by the SLCA method showed that concrete and steel buildings had a score of 0.199 and 0.189, respectively, which indicates that concrete had a slightly better social performance based on expert opinions. A multi-criteria assessment and sensitivity analysis of the results were conducted by a graphical tool, namely the mixing triangle, and showed that the overall preference of each alternative depends mainly on the importance weights given to each aspect of the assessment. However, one of the main findings of the research was that overall, giving a high importance weight to environmental dimension leads to sustainability preference of steel over concrete frame, while giving high importance weights to economic or social dimensions leads to sustainability preference of concrete over steel frame. Findings of the study are beneficial to decision-makers in the construction industry since they can decide on the best alternative among concrete and steel frames based on their strategies.
format article
author Amir Oladazimi
Saeed Mansour
Seyed Abbas Hosseinijou
Mohammad H. Majdfaghihi
author_facet Amir Oladazimi
Saeed Mansour
Seyed Abbas Hosseinijou
Mohammad H. Majdfaghihi
author_sort Amir Oladazimi
title Sustainability Identification of Steel and Concrete Construction Frames with Respect to Triple Bottom Line
title_short Sustainability Identification of Steel and Concrete Construction Frames with Respect to Triple Bottom Line
title_full Sustainability Identification of Steel and Concrete Construction Frames with Respect to Triple Bottom Line
title_fullStr Sustainability Identification of Steel and Concrete Construction Frames with Respect to Triple Bottom Line
title_full_unstemmed Sustainability Identification of Steel and Concrete Construction Frames with Respect to Triple Bottom Line
title_sort sustainability identification of steel and concrete construction frames with respect to triple bottom line
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8e41eba99a264c8886bc885a6ae9e52e
work_keys_str_mv AT amiroladazimi sustainabilityidentificationofsteelandconcreteconstructionframeswithrespecttotriplebottomline
AT saeedmansour sustainabilityidentificationofsteelandconcreteconstructionframeswithrespecttotriplebottomline
AT seyedabbashosseinijou sustainabilityidentificationofsteelandconcreteconstructionframeswithrespecttotriplebottomline
AT mohammadhmajdfaghihi sustainabilityidentificationofsteelandconcreteconstructionframeswithrespecttotriplebottomline
_version_ 1718412789097168896