Early life experience sets hard limits on motor learning as evidenced from artificial arm use

The study of artificial arms provides a unique opportunity to address long-standing questions on sensorimotor plasticity and development. Learning to use an artificial arm arguably depends on fundamental building blocks of body representation and would therefore be impacted by early life experience....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roni O Maimon-Mor, Hunter R Schone, David Henderson Slater, A Aldo Faisal, Tamar R Makin
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/8e50401750644f90b186c1f7fe522455
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:8e50401750644f90b186c1f7fe522455
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:8e50401750644f90b186c1f7fe5224552021-11-15T06:05:33ZEarly life experience sets hard limits on motor learning as evidenced from artificial arm use10.7554/eLife.663202050-084Xe66320https://doaj.org/article/8e50401750644f90b186c1f7fe5224552021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://elifesciences.org/articles/66320https://doaj.org/toc/2050-084XThe study of artificial arms provides a unique opportunity to address long-standing questions on sensorimotor plasticity and development. Learning to use an artificial arm arguably depends on fundamental building blocks of body representation and would therefore be impacted by early life experience. We tested artificial arm motor-control in two adult populations with upper-limb deficiencies: a congenital group—individuals who were born with a partial arm, and an acquired group—who lost their arm following amputation in adulthood. Brain plasticity research teaches us that the earlier we train to acquire new skills (or use a new technology) the better we benefit from this practice as adults. Instead, we found that although the congenital group started using an artificial arm as toddlers, they produced increased error noise and directional errors when reaching to visual targets, relative to the acquired group who performed similarly to controls. However, the earlier an individual with a congenital limb difference was fitted with an artificial arm, the better their motor control was. Since we found no group differences when reaching without visual feedback, we suggest that the ability to perform efficient visual-based corrective movements is highly dependent on either biological or artificial arm experience at a very young age. Subsequently, opportunities for sensorimotor plasticity become more limited.Roni O Maimon-MorHunter R SchoneDavid Henderson SlaterA Aldo FaisalTamar R MakineLife Sciences Publications Ltdarticlemotor controlamputeesvisuomotor integrationsensorimotor developmentprosthesisMedicineRScienceQBiology (General)QH301-705.5ENeLife, Vol 10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic motor control
amputees
visuomotor integration
sensorimotor development
prosthesis
Medicine
R
Science
Q
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle motor control
amputees
visuomotor integration
sensorimotor development
prosthesis
Medicine
R
Science
Q
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Roni O Maimon-Mor
Hunter R Schone
David Henderson Slater
A Aldo Faisal
Tamar R Makin
Early life experience sets hard limits on motor learning as evidenced from artificial arm use
description The study of artificial arms provides a unique opportunity to address long-standing questions on sensorimotor plasticity and development. Learning to use an artificial arm arguably depends on fundamental building blocks of body representation and would therefore be impacted by early life experience. We tested artificial arm motor-control in two adult populations with upper-limb deficiencies: a congenital group—individuals who were born with a partial arm, and an acquired group—who lost their arm following amputation in adulthood. Brain plasticity research teaches us that the earlier we train to acquire new skills (or use a new technology) the better we benefit from this practice as adults. Instead, we found that although the congenital group started using an artificial arm as toddlers, they produced increased error noise and directional errors when reaching to visual targets, relative to the acquired group who performed similarly to controls. However, the earlier an individual with a congenital limb difference was fitted with an artificial arm, the better their motor control was. Since we found no group differences when reaching without visual feedback, we suggest that the ability to perform efficient visual-based corrective movements is highly dependent on either biological or artificial arm experience at a very young age. Subsequently, opportunities for sensorimotor plasticity become more limited.
format article
author Roni O Maimon-Mor
Hunter R Schone
David Henderson Slater
A Aldo Faisal
Tamar R Makin
author_facet Roni O Maimon-Mor
Hunter R Schone
David Henderson Slater
A Aldo Faisal
Tamar R Makin
author_sort Roni O Maimon-Mor
title Early life experience sets hard limits on motor learning as evidenced from artificial arm use
title_short Early life experience sets hard limits on motor learning as evidenced from artificial arm use
title_full Early life experience sets hard limits on motor learning as evidenced from artificial arm use
title_fullStr Early life experience sets hard limits on motor learning as evidenced from artificial arm use
title_full_unstemmed Early life experience sets hard limits on motor learning as evidenced from artificial arm use
title_sort early life experience sets hard limits on motor learning as evidenced from artificial arm use
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/8e50401750644f90b186c1f7fe522455
work_keys_str_mv AT roniomaimonmor earlylifeexperiencesetshardlimitsonmotorlearningasevidencedfromartificialarmuse
AT hunterrschone earlylifeexperiencesetshardlimitsonmotorlearningasevidencedfromartificialarmuse
AT davidhendersonslater earlylifeexperiencesetshardlimitsonmotorlearningasevidencedfromartificialarmuse
AT aaldofaisal earlylifeexperiencesetshardlimitsonmotorlearningasevidencedfromartificialarmuse
AT tamarrmakin earlylifeexperiencesetshardlimitsonmotorlearningasevidencedfromartificialarmuse
_version_ 1718428565694840832